I don't want to use my brain while watching a kaiju movie. I want spectacle! Giant monsters beating the crap out of each other! Possibly using random wrestling moves!Godzilla: King of the Monsters. Uh...yeah. So that was a thing. A jumbled mess of a thing.
I think my favorite part was:we find Atlantis. And then nuke it to non-existence.
Dumb movie. If you can shut your brain off it's okay, but you gotta shut off the brain.
Oh, I'm not denying that I would have preferred more fighting. But there was a lot more than the previous movie so...¯\_(ツ)_/¯They showed all the monsters and only 4 of them really fought.
Yeah I'm with the majority of the people who like the film in theorizing that the Bruce Lee scene HAD to be Cliff embellishing to himself because COME ON-its fucking BRUCE, ya REALLY gonna make him the Worf of the Tarentino-verse?Once Upon a Time in Hollywood was really good and I wasn't bored for a moment during the 2 hour and 40 minute runtime.
I'm glad I didn't know anything about the story going in.
Nobody can turn a movie 180 degrees from weird dramedy into obscene violence better than QT.
The name of the movie is superbly fitting as it's exactly a fairy tale of late 60's Hollywood.
My only real negative is the weird sorta shitty portrayal of Bruce Lee. Every other real person portrayed is played straight, but Bruce Lee isn't. At all.
Meet the Robinsons suffered from it being at the tale end of Disney's in-house slump. I like everything but the middle of the movie where it's basically just "Hey, lets meet the family and never do anything with them again" but the beginning and end are both great. I feel like Bolt is where they finally got the formula "right" again, but Meet the Robinsons is at least worth a look.
Go watch The West Wing now, young lady!I had to look the dad on IMDB, and he was also the dad from Get Out. Fortunately they're very different characters.
But he was also the wiseass scientist in Godzilla: KOTM. Is that not enough?Go watch The West Wing now, young lady!
But at least Selma Hayek is hot?From Dusk Till Dawn
Would you believe I've never seen this before? And that I never had the surprise spoiled for me before?
Anyway, I was reading a discussion about twists in movies, and this title came up, so I decided to give it a try. The first half was excellent. Vintage Tarantino. The violence, the tension, the conflict, the dialogue, everything worked great. I figured the primary driver of the story would be Richie's deteriorating mental state and how Seth will need to deal with it.
And then the twist happened. And everything went batshit insane. To be honest, I didn't like the second half nearly as much as the first half. It has its moments, but it feels so different, and loses much of made the first half memorable, so I didn't really enjoy it.
First half, 10/10. Second half, 5/10. That works out to 7.5/10 overall, which isn't bad.
Soooooooo hot.But at least Selma Hayek is hot?
I still haven't seen more than the first 10min or so, though yes plenty of the rest has been spoiled (mostly via memes) and by a former coworker who insisted we give him the nickname "Sex Machine" because of that movie.From Dusk Till Dawn
Would you believe I've never seen this before? And that I never had the surprise spoiled for me before?
I'm just amazed we're at the point where someone can see this and not know the twist. I've always wondered how that would go and now I know.From Dusk Till Dawn
Would you believe I've never seen this before? And that I never had the surprise spoiled for me before?
Anyway, I was reading a discussion about twists in movies, and this title came up, so I decided to give it a try. The first half was excellent. Vintage Tarantino. The violence, the tension, the conflict, the dialogue, everything worked great. I figured the primary driver of the story would be Richie's deteriorating mental state and how Seth will need to deal with it.
And then the twist happened. And everything went batshit insane. To be honest, I didn't like the second half nearly as much as the first half. It has its moments, but it feels so different, and loses much of made the first half memorable, so I didn't really enjoy it.
First half, 10/10. Second half, 5/10. That works out to 7.5/10 overall, which isn't bad.
I also found this interesting, because I've never watched the movie all the way through, but I've ended up seeing bits and pieces while flipping through channels. I knew what the twist was long before I even knew the movie had a twist.I'm just amazed we're at the point where someone can see this and not know the twist. I've always wondered how that would go and now I know.
I wonder if this is one of those 'twists' like the one in Terminator 2 in which the movie is set up so that there could be a big reveal, but when it came time to advertise the movie, the production company decided telling everyone the twist beforehand would sell more tickets.I also found this interesting, because I've never watched the movie all the way through, but I've ended up seeing bits and pieces while flipping through channels. I knew what the twist was long before I even knew the movie had a twist.
I saw the movie long ago and forget the twist.I also found this interesting, because I've never watched the movie all the way through, but I've ended up seeing bits and pieces while flipping through channels. I knew what the twist was long before I even knew the movie had a twist.
I think, for me, the main problem was that I wanted to watch a Tarantino movie. When the twist happened and it became something other than a Tarantino movie, I started losing interest. Someone who's into the kind of movie the second half was would probably have a different opinion from mine.I'm just amazed we're at the point where someone can see this and not know the twist. I've always wondered how that would go and now I know.
But it could be that it's jarring. I don't know.I think, for me, the main problem was that I wanted to watch a Tarantino movie. When the twist happened and it became something other than a Tarantino movie, I started losing interest. Someone who's into the kind of movie the second half was would probably have a different opinion from mine.
I saw the movie long ago and forget the twist.
I think part of that is it's not a Tarantino movie, per se. I remember it being advertised as "from Quentin Tarantino and Robert Rodriguez", and imdb confirmed Rodriguez directed and Tarantino wrote with Alex Kurtzman. So there's your supernatural elements right there. It's kinda like how they collaborated on Grindhouse later on: Rodriguez was the supernatural (zombies) and Tarantino was the thriller (car chase).I think, for me, the main problem was that I wanted to watch a Tarantino movie. When the twist happened and it became something other than a Tarantino movie, I started losing interest. Someone who's into the kind of movie the second half was would probably have a different opinion from mine.
Thanks @Hailey Knight . I guess I went into it with it advertised that way, so it wasn't a twist to me.But it could be that it's jarring. I don't know.
We need more test subjects!
Vampires. It doesn't seem like a twist since it's only halfway through the movie and it was advertised as vampires, but there's no hint of supernatural through most of the movie and then suddenly--vampires! I'm sure there have been people looking for a vampire movie who have complained that there's too much build before they show up though.