My first thought was, "YOU NEVER HEARD OF ECCELSTON?!?!?!?!!111???1"Never even heard of him. ...
While I share your concern somewhat, I did like hearing that the new director plans to give this film a more "Viking feel" than the previous blend of Norse mythology and cosmic wonder-tech. I'm totally down with that.My only concern is Kenneth Branagh brought this amazing, epic scale feeling to the first Thor movie. I'm worried that, since he's not in the second, we won't get that same epicness.
I think he's already done all the pulling he can do.Can...can Eccelston pull off hair?
I feel that Branagh got the epic scale right, but he didn't make Thor actually feel much like a superpowered hero. I remember griping that the climactic battle in the movie, which involved a freaking GOD OF THUNDER on one side, basically came down to a fistfight. Why isn't Thor summoning lightning against Loki? Why isn't Loki blasting Thor with his frost giant powers? It's like the director created this magnificent canvas and then forgot to paint on it.My only concern is Kenneth Branagh brought this amazing, epic scale feeling to the first Thor movie. I'm worried that, since he's not in the second, we won't get that same epicness.
After first viewing, I felt a bit underwhelmed as well, but after second viewing, I now the fewer powers approach to the final battle; it seemed more focused on what was going on between the two of them.I feel that Branagh got the epic scale right, but he didn't make Thor actually feel much like a superpowered hero. I remember griping that the climactic battle in the movie, which involved a freaking GOD OF THUNDER on one side, basically came down to a fistfight. Why isn't Thor summoning lightning against Loki? Why isn't Loki blasting Thor with his frost giant powers? It's like the director created this magnificent canvas and then forgot to paint on it.
Still though, I liked the first Thor well enough, and I'll definitely be seeing the sequel.
Really don't see them using Hela, mostly because the movies have presented Loki a bit differently then the comics, and it may be weird to suddenly meet his daughter and attempting to explain the whole cycle of Ragnarok. (Also, I just can't see Hela having a "small role")Alice Krige has been added to the cast of T:tDW in what is described as a "small role". No word on who (or what) she is playing, but there has already been a lot of speculation. The likely choices are: Alflyse, queen of the dark elves; Hela, goddess of death; or even Death, as a setup for Guardians of the Galaxy/Avengers 2.
THAT IS A WALT SIMONSON DESIGN. Walt Simonson is a treasure who (arguably?) did more to create the mythos of Thor than Lee & Kirby. Rob Liefeld created Youngblood. Link their names again and I will be forced to...think...you...have very little understanding of comics.Now I remember how Liefield caught on.
Unsubstantiated rumor of the day:Thor 2 will have a Doctor Strange cameo. (via The Playlist)
Yep, they do.Have not seen the first movie yet, but did see the Avengers over the weekend. And in that film Thor and Loki go toe to toe in a physical fight, that I found very weird and not cannon to the comics. Does that occur in Thor 1?
Actually, both times Loki potentially has some form of external boost in power. In the Avengers, it's from the soul gem.Yep, they do.
I justified it to myself by saying that Thor's holding back against Loki in the Avengers, because Loki's his brother. Only after Loki enrages him does Thor deliver a straight beatdown.
No such excuse in the first film though. They're pretty evenly matched in that battle.
Which role did he give up? Also, I don't immediately know who the actor is. I don't watch that silly show.Isn't he the guy who gave up a role of a lifetime to start in bit roles for crappy TV and horrible movies?
the Doctor in Doctor Who. He was the actor they used to bring the show back and left after a single season. Mostly because it was set up as lets see if this is popular and we'll only get minor actors for small contracts and then suddenly bammo!Which role did he give up?
To be fair according to Jim Starlin Roy Thomas told him that if he was going to steal one of the New Gods he should at least rip off Darkseid, "the really good one." Hence why Thanos doesn't look like Metron.Not sure if joking....
Happens, see blatant acknowledgement of ripping off the visual design above....and I just realized he's a DC character, not Marvel. *sigh* Goddamn mixed-up comic mythologies...
That is why I was unsure if joking... I didn't want to be that guy going "Huh that's DC dude" if you were just being sarcastic....and I just realized he's a DC character, not Marvel. *sigh* Goddamn mixed-up comic mythologies...
I wasn't, so thanks for not being that dude.That is why I was unsure if joking... I didn't want to be that guy going "Huh that's DC dude" if you were just being sarcastic.
This was my exact thought process.I was like, WHAT? Thor comes out in four days? Then I remembered you guys do dates all silly.
One of those rock guys actually are Korg. Thor thwarted their attempt at conquest of earth.Them rock folk are about as Thor is in Marvel.
Loki is pretty much Thor's primary villain outside of the Enchantress, so no arguments from a comic book perspective. Hell, almost any Midgard enemy Thor has was empowered in some way by Loki. Basically, Loki is always present in most every Thor storyline.[DOUBLEPOST=1376744321,1376744070][/DOUBLEPOST]I just hope to god that they don't ever try to bring the Wrecking Crew to the big screen. I'd be OK with the Absorbing Man, but the rest of them wouldn't translate that well to film.Honestly, I don't mind at all. Hiddleston is great as Loki. (I say this as a non-comic reader, so I'm fully prepared to get my ass kicked for it by those who do). So I'm still hyped for this movie.
Sigh, all this talking about it making me miss the Avengers cartoon. They did some cool stuff with these characters. I love what Thor did with Absorbing Man in the Gamma World episode.I just hope to god that they don't ever try to bring the Wrecking Crew to the big screen. I'd be OK with the Absorbing Man, but the rest of them wouldn't translate that well to film.
It would be groovy just to see him on the screen or have just a few lines at the very least.It'll never happen, but I'd love to get some Beta Ray Bill in one of these movies.
The recently ended Godkiller arc in the newer Thor book was pretty solid, too, that'd make a great movie.
Have him show up pre-Asgardian powerup in GotG in a cameo.That would be cool, but Bill requires way to much of an explanation to just show up for a cameo.
Yeah, this is true. His origin would need almost a full movie in itself, and even fans might not recognize him without his horseface.Even then, they'd have to explain how an alien ended up wielding the powers of a Norse god. I'm not saying it wouldn't be cool, but it's just not feasible and certainly not accessible enough for non fans.
Oh, wait, you mean just have him show up as an alien. Yeah, that would work, if they don't go into tying him to Thor directly.
Wait till the abysmal numbers hit for Guardians of the Galaxy.So far reviews are positive (for the most part), but not overwhelmingly so. Less "Hell yeah!" and more "Eh, it's good I guess."
Is the momentum on comic book movies beginning to wane?
Truth. I've been predicting a big-time flop for that movie since day 1.Wait till the abysmal numbers hit for Guardians of the Galaxy.
I really hope that doesn't happen.Wait till the abysmal numbers hit for Guardians of the Galaxy.
That's pretty much it in a nuthshell. Of the last batch of Avengers movies, Thor was probably the second weakest - Iron Man 2 being the weakest. Still good in its own right, but not as good compared to its compatriots. It doesn't help that Thor's not exactly the easiest of characters to write, both as a character in general and his mythology. Or that, let's face it, the most entertaining actor and thus character in the films is the guy playing Loki.I thought it was better than the first film, but it was still just good. I don't think it's a case of waning interest in heroes, just that Thor's own films haven't been as good (though still good) as the other Marvel Studios films.
I care less about them since I saw Avengers. It felt like everything was leading up to that, and now the anticipation has passed. Just speaking for myself.So far reviews are positive (for the most part), but not overwhelmingly so. Less "Hell yeah!" and more "Eh, it's good I guess."
Is the momentum on comic book movies beginning to wane?
I think that may swing when they start seeing that there is a current buildup for the next phase of Marvel movies that actually starts with the early end of credits scene of Thor: The Dark World.I care less about them since I saw Avengers. It felt like everything was leading up to that, and now the anticipation has passed. Just speaking for myself.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using Tapatalk
Eh, don't think about it as build up to another one. Just enjoy them as individual, self-contained movies like the last batch.I care less about them since I saw Avengers. It felt like everything was leading up to that, and now the anticipation has passed. Just speaking for myself.
Just came back from it.
Initial impressions: Pretty good. At least as good as the first one, and almost certainly better. There was a nice mix of humor and action, and the cast all did well with the material they were given.
Other impressions, big spoilers ahoy:
1. Damn I had no idea Frigga was so badass. She single handedly took down Malekith in direct melee combat.
Yes, yes she is.
2. Thor feels a bit less powerful in here compared to the first film, and in The Avengers. He could withstand punches from the Hulk without sustaining a scratch, yet hits from Kurst is enough to bloody him? Fighting Malekith is enough to knock him out? You can't tell me these guys are stronger than the freaking Hulk.
People keep mentioning this, but they need to keep in mind that the people that Thor is fighting in the other realms are about equivalent if not even more powerful than him. The stone that turned the Dark Elf into Kurse makes him far more powerful than the average asgardian. In Thor's case, on the same or greater power levels that he has.
3. If they really want to surprise the audience, kill off Loki and make it stick. I can guarantee no one in the audience was fooled by Loki's "death" near the end there. Similarly, I can guarantee no one though Loki had really betrayed Thor and cut off his hand immediately before the death scene.
That's the think with a god of Mischeif, you never know if he's going to actually play to or against type. We've kind of expected him to do the opposite of what we would expect him to do. That's kind of a writing failure.
4. A couple of plot holes my wife noticed, but I did not. Firstly, Malekith's plan is to unleash the Aether through the linked portals. Last we saw, he was in the process of doing so already, as in the Aether was already flowing into Asgard. So why would teleporting Malekith back to the Dark World stop the process? The Aether's been released now, as Malekith says to Thor at the end. There's no explanation why defeating Malekith would remove the already-released Aether. Secondly, the Aether is a liquid, and last we saw of it, it was either flowing through the various realms, or getting crushed under the giant ship along with Malekith. So how did the Asgardians get ahold of (apparently all of) the Aether, to deliver to the Collector? Also, I'm not sure about this, so it might need confirmation, but not all of the Aether went into Jane, some might still be in the pillar. So... what's going to happen with the rest of the Aether there?
The Aether isn't actually liquid, it's more a flowing energy made manifest. It is also one of the Infinity Gems (most likely the Power Gem, if they're going by the color scheme from the infinity gauntlet series), which means it can never be destroyed. It and the Tessaract are universal constants. It needs a host for its power to be weilded for destruction. When Maleketh died, the power reverted back to its original form. All the Asgardians would have had to do was go and get it.
5. I cracked up at "Darcy!" "Jane!" "Ian!" "Selvig!" "MEW MEW!!"
I personally lost it when he hangs Mjolnir on the coat hook in Jane's appartment.
He could withstand punches from the Hulk without sustaining a scratch, yet hits from Kurse is enough to bloody him?
It's a naturally occurring phenomenon that takes place once every 5000 years that causes the realms to merge together for brief moments, it's really just far more likely random chance caused by the chaos. It's not like the previous generation of asgardians could predict where the boundaries would break down. Especially since most beings can't even observe the situation until they interact with it.Wife: The Asgardians didn't hide that stuff well if she could just accidentally teleport to it.
Me: It likely wanted to be found, so it pulled her there.
Answered her own question there, didn't she.Wife: Why does Loki want to be ruler? Surely he grew up knowing Thor was supposed to be king.
Now see, why didn't you guys just re-watch the first one to avoid that sort of thing? Or at least SOME of the questions.I would find that cooler except for the fact my wife is a notorious movie talker and it can kind of get on my nerves. This movie was actually one of her worst. We watched the original Thor together, and I saw Avengers with her whole family, but the only thing she seemed to remember about either was that Chris Hemsworth has a hot body, because she was making me fill her in on everything.
Wife: What does Jane Foster even do?
Me: She is an astrophysicist, a scientist.
Wife: Who is that naked guy?
Me: Eric Selvig, he was in Thor and Avengers.
Wife: The Asgardians didn't hide that stuff well if she could just accidentally teleport to it.
Me: It likely wanted to be found, so it pulled her there.
Wife: Why does Loki want to be ruler? Surely he grew up knowing Thor was supposed to be king.
Me: He is power hungry? Now SHHHHHH.
Didn't your wife have to read and/or see Hamlet in High School? It's not like the younger sibling wanting power is a NEW trope.Wife: Why does Loki want to be ruler? Surely he grew up knowing Thor was supposed to be king.
I hate this so much. I've told people before "Maybe if you paid attention instead of asking me questions, you'd already know the answer."I have a female friend that is the same way.
Her: Who is that?
Her: What's he doing there?
Her: What's that thing?
Me: WE'RE TEN MINUTES IN. I'M WATCHING THE SAME GODDAMN MOVIE YOU ARE. I DON'T KNOW EITHER, JUST WAIT AND ASSUME THAT THE MOVIE WILL EVENTUALLY TELL US THESE THINGS!
Woof, other than that one really big "Spock in a Cave" moment, I enjoyed the movie enough.
I don't really feel like it was random chance that Jane stumbled onto the Aether. It's a cosmic power, one of the infinity gems, it probably drew her there to be set free. Stupendously powerful ultra artifacts are like that.
It's very rare that she would watch a superhero movie twice, more so with the kid around now, so watching it again was not really an option. Even then, she can be pretty bad about remembering certain things in movies, even ones we just watched. The two of us had many a discussion in the car because she would forget about a certain section of a scene, leading to me having to explain it to her again so she understood the purpose.Now see, why didn't you guys just re-watch the first one to avoid that sort of thing? Or at least SOME of the questions. Also, there's no way I could be with someone like that. It'd be like taking a 5-year old to see a movie. No offence to your wife.
Every time my best friend and I go to see a comic book movie, he gets a 20 min debriefing afterwards on the characters in the movie (yes, he does ask, I don't just foist it on him).It's very rare that she would watch a superhero movie twice, more so with the kid around now, so watching it again was not really an option. Even then, she can be pretty bad about remembering certain things in movies, even ones we just watched. The two of us had many a discussion in the car because she would forget about a certain section of a scene, leading to me having to explain it to her again so she understood the purpose.
Really, I don't mind too much filling her in one some details. It allows me to geek out a bit, it's just the times she goes a bit nuts with it that I get a little crazy. That, and those times she asks me what people said, or asks me questions that the movie itself tells you.
Odin: ... Frigga...
Wife: What did he just say?
Me: Frigga.
Wife: Frigga?
Me: Thor's mother. (My mind: Thor introduced her like 5 minutes ago!)
Same here for the most part, though my wife usually gets bored after a few minutes. That or we run into a bit of an issue once again with her remembering things.Every time my best friend and I go to see a comic book movie, he gets a 20 min debriefing afterwards on the characters in the movie (yes, he does ask, I don't just foist it on him).
Heh, my wife stews on the movie and then pops up questions afterwards. We saw the film in the morning, but that night as we were cooking dinner, she suddenly came up with, "Can Thor's hammer travel through space to get to him when he's been transported to another realm? I mean, we saw the hammer fly off into space, right? So does that mean if it travels far enough, it can eventually reach the Dark World?"Same here for the most part, though my wife usually gets bored after a few minutes. That or we run into a bit of an issue once again with her remembering things.
Conversation literally 10 minutes after the movie ended.
Me: So the Infinity Gems are these universal constants, items of great power. That guy at the end of the Avengers seeks to collect them.
Wife: Guy at the end?
Me: Yes, Thanos.
Wife: Thanos? You mean the weird guy at the end of Thor 2?
Me: No that was the Collector. Thanos was at the end of the Avengers, the guy with the purple face.
Wife: Purple face? I don't remember all that minut crap.
Me: ... Anyways in the original Thor, they showed in the vault that they have a item called the Infinity Gauntlet...
Wife: Let's go to the store I need to pick up a few things.
Conversation over.
The answer is yes.Heh, my wife stews on the movie and then pops up questions afterwards. We saw the film in the morning, but that night as we were cooking dinner, she suddenly came up with, "Can Thor's hammer travel through space to get to him when he's been transported to another realm? I mean, we saw the hammer fly off into space, right? So does that mean if it travels far enough, it can eventually reach the Dark World?"
To which I had to admit I didn't know.
I'm not surprised. It's basically taking Hollywood's love of sequels to a new level, people are more likely to go to a movie they've heard of before. I wonder if this will lead to the same problem that comics ran into though, in that new fans have trouble finding an entry point to the new material without having to go through a long backlog to catch up.So I was checking out Wikipedia earlier and it seems Thor 2 just got into the top ten for the years worldwide gross. Not bad for only being in theaters a little over a week. Still has a long way to go through if it wants to get close to Iron Man 3.
So as an aside, did anyone think this format of treating the movies like comics (different characters and stories, but all interconnected) was going to be as big of a hit as it has become?
No love for Darcy Lewis?Saw it. Loved it. No complaints.
Beginning to end it was exactly what I wanted out of a Thor movie and more.
The Frigga scenes? Amazing.
The Loki scenes? Predictable but amazing.
The Thor scenes? Badassary every time.
The Jane scenes? Forced but necessary.
The Odin scenes? Weak but to the point.
The battle? Epic.
Best part?
One down.... five to go....
Holy hell I forgot to mention this:No love for Darcy Lewis?
This movie only flaw is that we have to yet get a scene between Darcy and Loki, that is epic.