Heh, yes well, if those really were eggs, they'd have to be a lot bigger to provide for a creature the size of the Loch Ness Monster. Other considerations are that just one creature couldn't reproduce. So, there'd have to be two. However, to ensure viability of the species, there'd also have to be much more than one breeding pair. There'd have to be dozens at least. So, with that many creatures, there's no way they could have survived this long without a ton of forensic evidence being found. Also, they'd need a large source of food. There simply isn't any in Loch Ness. There are a few fish species, but not in the numbers and/or sizes required to support such large creatures. Also, there is little plant life in Loch Ness, so if the creatures are herbivores, they'd have to eat the plants on the land or close to the water. This would again lead to many more sightings and lots of physical evidence that we just don't have.
There's also the consideration that all of the evidence we've received so far has turned out to be fake. Even the infamous "Surgeon's" photograph. All of the eye witnesses are either trying to keep the tourist trade going or are mistaken in what they saw. They get so worked up into wanting to see the monster that they mistake boat wake or some debris in the water, etc., for a sighting.
Wow, people are still searching for ___________ even though all scientific evidence, logic, and common sense dictates there's not one?
A few religions outside your house want to have a word with you
[/QUOTE]
Heh, tell them that I've found as much evidence for God as I have for the Loch Ness Monster. Also, that I'm at work, so picketing my apartment will only piss off my neighbors.
