Universal healthcare will impact small businesses the most

Status
Not open for further replies.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...bf58fe-b8ca-11e2-92f3-f291801936b8_story.html

When the health care law was passed, Obama claimed it would not tax people or businesses directly, instead it would tax insurance companies (who would then pass the tax on, but that's hardly relevant to their claim).

One of the loopholes of this tax, however, is that businesses which provide their own insurance to their employees are not taxed under this provision. Only health insurance companies providing health insurance to businesses which don't self insure.

Over 80% of large businesses with more than 500 employees self insure.

Over 75% of businesses between 100 and 500 employees, so-called small businesses, use group insurance via major insurance providers.

Their premiums are going to go up significantly as a result of this tax, while big business premiums will stay the same, and possibly go down depending on how things ultimately shake out.

With the end result being that small businesses are shouldering one of the key sources of income in the healthcare plan that was to provide funding for the insurance of the currently 27 million uninsured and underinsured Americans.

Unintended consequences of a supposedly good loophole, or big business pushing the legislation in the direction that will lower their costs and raise the bar for potential competitors?

If only Obama would direct congress to fully fund the various small business initiatives, I'd actually believe him when he says he supports small business, but between lack of funding for programs he says he supports, and his healthcare law unevenly penalizing small business, it's hard to believe he's really paying attention to this market.
 

Necronic

Staff member
The 80% and 75% number aren't telling unless you also include what % of the total each population is.

If the 100-500 employee businesses only make up 5% of the market then they aren't shouldering anything, it will be the large non-self insuring businesses that will be taking most of the burden.

Not meaning to take a shot at you, but those numbers seem meaningless/deceptive without the overall demographic breakdown.

ed: ok so I looked it up and ~50% of the workforce works somewhere with less than 500 employees.

Ed2: ok, yeah so I dunno about this. The NFIB (a small business lobying firm) said that this will create job losses, and that 59% of those losses will happen to small businesses. If small business is 50% of the market, 59% only barely strikes me as unfair weight. I mean....ok I guess it's actually like a 40% difference between 41 and 59. Maybe that is significant.
 
This was the first thing that occurred to me. It does seem like lately an awful lot of legislation seems to go in favor of the corporations, doesn't it?

--Patrick
That was probably a fair decision actually... the farmer was doing a run around so he wouldn't have to pay Monsanto's (unfairly high) price. Monsanto may be scum, but their entire seed business would collapse if everyone started doing what this guy did.

Besides, Monsanto has way bigger problems to deal with.
 
Yeah, I'm all too familiar with their business practices. I'm more worried about their growing control on the world's food supply than their (legitimate) complaints about someone using their product in a way they've been contracted not to do. I worry what is going to happen when virtually all craps are genetically modified and are the same strains... especially when a virus/bacteria decides that a strain of something simply has to go.

We've basically lost bananas already. The genetics of them are so narrow that it's entirely likely they will be wiped out in the next few hundred years.
 
Monsanto can suck my dick
Ha-haaah! It's funny because your avatar is a skeleton.
tibiacrop.jpg
Click the image for the source, but be aware that it is also as NSFW as can be.
Nevermind...

--Patrick
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top