You left out T. A. Edison, who is probably History's best example.if history has taught us anything, it's that it doesn't pay to be the guy who invents something, it pays to be the guy who markets it.
Bill Gates
Alexander Graham Bell
Stan Lee
Mark Zuckerberg
By all accounts, Mike Sekowsky was a treasure of a man and a consummate professional who could hit a deadline like a prize fighter, but his barrel-chested Justice League looks like a bunch of cardboard cutouts next to Steve Ditko’s weird spindly limbs and twisted grimaces or John Romita’s solid, romance novel cover models running around in Spider-Man. Whether they like it or not, everyone knows Marvel’s doing something different. But that’s only half of how they set themselves apart.
The other half, quite frankly, might be what made all the difference, and you can lay it at the feet of exactly one man: Stan Lee.
You can argue for hours, days even, about Lee’s proper place in history, about whether he deserves the starry eyed admiration of the general public who think he’s the sole creator of everything there was in the Marvel Universe and whose shoulders bore the monumental, nearly unthinkable task of scripting every single classic of the early days of Marvel, or whether he deserves the scorn of the Kirby and Ditko partisans who see him as a funky flash-man who attached himself like a parasite to more talented artists and then used them to catapult himself (and only himself) into the spotlight every chance he got. I think the truth of that is somewhere in the middle, but there’s one thing you can say about Lee that I don’t think anyone’s going to dispute: He’s the ultimate salesman. Lee is, to this day, a self-promoter of unfathomable skill, and in those early days of Marvel, he was in his prime.
I really wish DC would cut this out. Seriously.ThatNickGuy You should check out this week's Ask Chris. It's a great examination of DC's obsession with being Marvel comics, but there's a brief section on Stan Lee that I think was relevant to earlier discussions in this thread.
Tim Sale's definitely got a unique art style, but I love it. If you like this, he's done quite a lot of work with the same writer. They did a series of Halloween-themed Batman one-shots that are collected into Haunted Knight, as well as a direct sequel to Long Halloween in Dark Harvest. They also did a FANTASTIC Superman book called For All Seasons. To top it all off, they also did work for Marvel! Spider-Man: Blue, Daredevil: Yellow, and Hulk: Grey.Batman: The Long Halloween I don't care anyone says I love this story. Its dark, full of red herrings, and has some WEIRD artwork that I love in any comic.
I LOVED Hulk:Grey, haven't read it in a hella long time though. That scene with the bunny, DAMN!
How's the book, overall? Like in terms of both how well-made it is and how well the story holds up to 15 years of time?DC 1,000,000: Dear lord this comic is awesome and teaches us the lesson to NOT PATRONIZE NEGATIVE GORRILLA QUEEN!
The book is a nice hardcover with a well designed book jacket, and the paper is that shiny kind that doesn't degrade easily. In terms of holding up, its actually MORE relevant than it was in 98. The 860th century is a GREAT metaphor for an information obsessed society, like how when Superman does the future equivalent of turning off the internet for five minutes and everybody goes APE SHIT! You ever see that episode of South Park where the internet disappears and the world falls apart? Basically that, but TWELVE YEARS BEFORE! Grant. Freaking. CALLED IT! Chaos magic is real.How's the book, overall? Like in terms of both how well-made it is and how well the story holds up to 15 years of time?
Nu52? Nope. I'm not reading a thing from DC anymore.Action Comics, @ThatNickGuy you need to read this. Trust me, Paks run starts with issue 25, and the only complaint I have is with that awful n52 suit.
Because I'm not reading one Superman comic? Hardly. There are plenty of great comics out there and almost none of them are by DC or Marvel.Your loss.
I am shocked - SHOCKED - that a comic book death wasn't permanent.Spock's wild ride is ending, Parker's back in April. Huzzah!
Source:However, the question on everyone's mind has not been the "when", but the "how" Peter Parker returns from the dead and Slott is quick to tease just that. "In a strange and terrifying way. And... possibly... at a very great cost. Remember, nothing is ever easy for Peter Parker. It's one of the reasons he's a true hero," says Slott.
Quesada's always been a blowhard like that. He can't help but be the heavy handed publicity loudmouth.I think everyone knew it was coming, it's more the adamant NO HE'S DEAD SHUT UP's that Slott and Marvel were throwing out over the last year.
I'm actually indifferent to the character, but it would be nice if one his deceased side-kicks came back to life and didn't turn into a complete jack ass.I'm still mystified by the love for Damien Wayne. Never liked him, probably never will.
Wait, what? There's a future Jean now, too? For fuck's sake, that's the kind of soap drama shit why I avoid X-Men.Hell, Jean is back TWICE. At the same time. Past and future Jean are running around 616 right now (past is, at least, not sure if future is still there).