A
Alucard
Both of them are considered to be the richest guys in both respected universes.
heh, Interesting there.
It depends on the writer, but defensive/non-directly-lethal technologies definitely tends to be part of it, like enhanced body armor, knock-out gases, stealth aircraft, computer development, etc.Come to think of it though, I've never been 100% sure on what exactly Waynetech does. I'd guess military stuff, but with Wayne's contempt for taking lives I can't imagine he'd develop weapons or anything. Maybe it's all body armor and non lethal weapons? His dad was a surgeon though, so I'd guess they have a lot to do with the medical sciences as well.
He swims in money and, according to articles that say rich men are better at sex, fucks like a tiger.You guys are going at it all wrong. Without looking at that article, we should all know by know Scrooge McDuck is basically made of gold and shits diamonds. he can afford to pogo-cane right off of priceless gems without batting an eyelash.
He swims in money and, according to articles that say rich men are better at sex, fucks like a tiger.[/QUOTE]You guys are going at it all wrong. Without looking at that article, we should all know by know Scrooge McDuck is basically made of gold and shits diamonds. he can afford to pogo-cane right off of priceless gems without batting an eyelash.
He swims in money and, according to articles that say rich men are better at sex, fucks like a tiger.[/QUOTE]You guys are going at it all wrong. Without looking at that article, we should all know by know Scrooge McDuck is basically made of gold and shits diamonds. he can afford to pogo-cane right off of priceless gems without batting an eyelash.
Oh, a fictional richest guys list... this oughta be good.
You don't see Bruce drowning his sorrows in a bottle of whiskey, either. But mind you, Bats isn't even in my top ten favourite superheroes. I like 'em and all, but he's just a scared little boy lashing out at the world with his toys. I prefer the country bumpkin from another planet who does the right thing.I'll tell you who's awesomer: Tony Stark. You don't see him whining all day about his parents being dead.
You don't see Bruce drowning his sorrows in a bottle of whiskey, either. But mind you, Bats isn't even in my top ten favourite superheroes. I like 'em and all, but he's just a scared little boy lashing out at the world with his toys. I prefer the country bumpkin from another planet who does the right thing.I'll tell you who's awesomer: Tony Stark. You don't see him whining all day about his parents being dead.
.I'll tell you who's awesomer: Tony Stark. You don't see him whining all day about his parents being dead.
The list is probably normalized to 2010 inflation scales. If you were to project Scrooge's fortune to today, he'd be a rich old fuck.How the fuck is Ebenezer Scrooge richer than Tony Stark? I call article Bullshit.
The list is probably normalized to 2010 inflation scales. If you were to project Scrooge's fortune to today, he'd be a rich old fuck.[/QUOTE]How the fuck is Ebenezer Scrooge richer than Tony Stark? I call article Bullshit.
The list is probably normalized to 2010 inflation scales. If you were to project Scrooge's fortune to today, he'd be a rich old fuck.[/QUOTE]How the fuck is Ebenezer Scrooge richer than Tony Stark? I call article Bullshit.
Here's the thing. If it's Forbes, you would expect them to do a little bit of research on the subject. Even if they are fictional characters, you could still potentially chart wealth through different factors either using real life stock or comic book indications as a basis. But if they are just throwing darts at a mass of pictures I think I can feel a little cheated.
Here's the thing. If it's Forbes, you would expect them to do a little bit of research on the subject. Even if they are fictional characters, you could still potentially chart wealth through different factors either using real life stock or comic book indications as a basis. But if they are just throwing darts at a mass of pictures I think I can feel a little cheated.
Here's the thing. If it's Forbes, you would expect them to do a little bit of research on the subject. Even if they are fictional characters, you could still potentially chart wealth through different factors either using real life stock or comic book indications as a basis. But if they are just throwing darts at a mass of pictures I think I can feel a little cheated.
Alfred by default.Speaking of comparisons between Bruce Wayne and Tony Stark, has anybody ever wondered who'd win if Alfred and Jarvis got into a fight?
He swims in money and, according to articles that say rich men are better at sex, fucks like a tiger.[/QUOTE]You guys are going at it all wrong. Without looking at that article, we should all know by know Scrooge McDuck is basically made of gold and shits diamonds. he can afford to pogo-cane right off of priceless gems without batting an eyelash.
I hate to bring the real world into this, but I don't see how being a weapons maker brings in the really big bucks. Forbes list of billionaires is topped by Gates and Buffett, with telecom and software guys in 3rd and 4th. Number 5 is the founder of IKEA.But as for the topic at hand? I'd say Tony Stark. Bruce Wayne's money is more confined within Gotham. Like Luthor and Metropolis, he basically OWNS Gotham and does have some pockets of money around the world, but it's mostly confined within the city. Stark? Stark has contracts all over the Marvel Universe and previously was a weapons manufacturer, which made him a LOT of money.