http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501363_162-57482557/pa-church-pastor-charged-in-fake-kidnapping/
Well now, I've seen it all.
Well now, I've seen it all.
When you say stuff like that, the universe sees it as a challenge, you know.Well now, I've seen it all.
I really would love to be in some of these planning sessions. How the heck does that sound like a smart idea?An error in judgement, to be sure. But excusable, if it doesn't happen again.
The lead guy didn't think it through, and nobody told him it was a bad idea. But on the whole, shit happens. Mistakes are occasionally made, and if you're unwilling to tolerate them, and seek to assign blame for everything that goes wrong, then pretty soon nothing gets done when people are more concerned about covering their own asses against failure than they are of doing what they are supposed to do.I really would love to be in some of these planning sessions. How the heck does that sound like a smart idea?
That's the way things are nowadays, isn't it. If something goes wrong, fire people. Everyone knows there is a plethora of replacements out there, so why tolerate people who can't get everything right 100% of the time. Or at least fire the ones who own up to it instead of trying to make it look like it was someone else's fault, as those obviously lack common sense. Right?Someone better get fired over this. At least a few people. This is the kind of dumb ass stuff I saw all the time when I was younger. These people are idiots.
Yes. Glad we're in agreement.as those obviously lack common sense. Right?
Thisthisthis.Yes. Glad we're in agreement.
If you exhibit gross incompetence to the point that you're committing a federal crime (which kidnapping is) then you should feel lucky if all you lose is your job.
Oh and this.Dude, this isn't someone "making a mistake". This is someone committing a felony and saying "oh it was just pretend".
Like I said. Inexcusable.
Alright, apparently I've crossed a line here. Ceasing and desisting.Dude... there is a huge, HUGE, difference between nothing getting done because people are more concerned about covering their asses and committing a federal felony kidnapping at gunpoint and then claiming it was all a stunt. You know... you actually seemed pretty level-headed in that whole discussion over eliminating minimum wage, albeit a little tunnel-visioned; but this is just pants-on-head retarded. This was a church youth-pastor. Are you really concerned that the Word of God won't get spread around anymore because people are too busy covering their asses to bother committed federal felony kidnappings?
That's the way things are nowadays, isn't it. If something goes wrong, fire people. Everyone knows there is a plethora of replacements out there, so why tolerate people who can't get everything right 100% of the time. Or at least fire the ones who own up to it instead of trying to make it look like it was someone else's fault, as those obviously lack common sense. Right?
If the parents had signed off on this, if the kids had known they were going to encounter a "religious persecution simulation", if the simulation had ended with the trip across the parking lot (I.E, milk & cookies in the pastor's living room instead of interrogations), any number of "ifs" could move this from the "blatantly criminal" category into "well that was a bit much, don't do it again" category. None of that happened. I could not find the false imprisonment statutes for Pennsylvania, but I could kind the kidnapping statute, thought it might be a touch out of date, and I've highlighted the pertinent sections:The lead guy didn't think it through, and nobody told him it was a bad idea. But on the whole, shit happens. Mistakes are occasionally made, and if you're unwilling to tolerate them, and seek to assign blame for everything that goes wrong, then pretty soon nothing gets done when people are more concerned about covering their own asses against failure than they are of doing what they are supposed to do.
Literally the only part of this case that is even iffy on qualifying is the "substantial distance under the circumstances" bit. And, while their actual destination was just across the parking lot, I'd argue that "in a van with a bag over your head while held at apparent gun point" renders almost any distance pretty substantial, especially if they made the kids think it was further.§ 2901. Kidnapping.
(a) Offense defined.--A person is guilty of kidnapping if he unlawfully removes another a substantial distance under the circumstances from the place where he is found, or if he unlawfully confines another for a substantial period in a place of isolation, with any of the following intentions:
(1) To hold for ransom or reward, or as a shield or
hostage.
(2) To facilitate commission of any felony or flight
thereafter.
(3) To inflict bodily injury on or to terrorize the victim or another.
(4) To interfere with the performance by public
officials of any governmental or political function.
(b) Grading.--Kidnapping is a felony of the first degree. A removal or confinement is unlawful within the meaning of this section if it is accomplished by force, threat or deception, or,
in the case of a person who is under the age of 14 years or an
incapacitated person, if it is accomplished without the consent
of a parent, guardian or other person responsible for general
supervision of his welfare.
(Apr. 16, 1992, P.L.108, No.24, eff. 60 days)