Playing the long odds man! I tripled my money today; let's see if I can do it again.More insider trading, Adam? You're a bad, bad man.
Playing the long odds man! I tripled my money today; let's see if I can do it again.More insider trading, Adam? You're a bad, bad man.
Teach me your ways, Adam-sanPlaying the long odds man! I tripled my money today; let's see if I can do it again.
His net worth more than doubled this morning.(looks at the profiles, is really confused) You tripled your money today?
When you sell a stock you keep the money, but you lose the score that stock gave you, so you drop in leaderboard rankings.(looks at the profiles, is really confused) You tripled your money today?
And then add 5% for the gouging trade provider.I see. Don't look at the gain/loss, look at what the person is at today after they made their sales (if any apply).
Me too. I've made a hell of a lot more from posting than I have from any stocks.I started with around 8000. I've sold off my worst losers and show in the green, but my money goes up mostly because of my messageboard posts... not my skill at picking stocks.
They do take it out, but if you wanted to see gross stock earnings, you'd add it back. That's what I meant.Wait, you add 5%? Shouldn't they be taking that out instead?[DOUBLEPOST=1355178829][/DOUBLEPOST]
Me too. I've made a hell of a lot more from posting than I have from any stocks.
Ok. That makes more sense.They do take it out, but if you wanted to see gross stock earnings, you'd add it back. That's what I meant.
I guess we just presume that everyone started with $5000.
If there was a way to see net gains since the beginning of time, that would eliminate a lot of the hodgepodgeyness while still allowing for income from other sources to engender participation.I think it would have made more sense to give everyone $5000 and then disable other ways of getting money other than the stock market (including people transferring halbucks). Then the porfolio's would make a lot more sense. As it stands... it's pretty hodgepodge as to what people have been doing. Still fun though.
Well...Everyone started at $5000. What else would you like to know? How much was made on the stock market alone?If there was a way to see net gains since the beginning of time, that would eliminate a lot of the hodgepodgeyness while still allowing for income from other sources to engender participation.
Yeah, I think that would be a nice to know. If we went purely by income from posts, Yoshi would be the richest person here.Well...Everyone started at $5000. What else would you like to know? How much was made on the stock market alone?
I reset everyone at 5000 HB. Past posts don't mean anything, nor does it mean anything if you had billions before.
Relic is based in BC and as per my new directive, all BC based THQ employees will now be reassigned as people who's only goal is to follow Adam around and tell people that according to Halforums Stock Trader, he's doing worse than their boss, the lovely Frank.I'm only bitching for my sake. As it is now, I'm at the bottom of the trading list simply because I lost a shit ton of money today on one big trade, versus the shit ton of money I made this morning which was much more significant. Being worse than Frank hurts me. It hurts me deep.
By my math, you hold 5932 shares with 6.86 million shares of THQI outstanding at $1.29 per share. I currently hold 438 shares for a net difference of 5494 shares. 5494 shares times $1.29 per share = $7097.26.Relic is based in BC and as per my new directive, all BC based THQ employees will now be reassigned as people who's only goal is to follow Adam around and tell people that according to Halforums Stock Trader, he's doing worse than their boss, the lovely Frank.
Your logic is solid. No performance development plan required....for now.Under my leadership, THQ stock is boooming. Firing me for vindictive reasons would be a mistake.
Most of the time they have estimates as to when things are going to correct and set up automatic triggers to sell when the stock hits that price. Also, if the stock fails to hit that price they have triggers that say, "If it falls X amount from a peak then sell."Question for the more knowledgeable in this area:
So I jumped in on CASY right before trading ended last night because they were going to be announcing their earnings after the close, which came in above estimates. So, predictably, the stick price is rising this morning.
How do you estimate when enough is enough and get out before the re-correction? I'm sure that actual market-folk don't entirely guess.
No, I get that part (I used to work P&L for a commodities trading company that did arbitrage between international commodities markets), but how do they make those stock estimates in the first place? What do they look at?Most of the time they have estimates as to when things are going to correct and set up automatic triggers to sell when the stock hits that price. Also, if the stock fails to hit that price they have triggers that say, "If it falls X amount from a peak then sell."
You'd be amazed at how much of this is automated now and slanted towards the companies who get realtime quotes. Their computers can make millions of microtransactions in the time it takes us to physically look through stuff. By the time we realize a stock has gone up, these places have already bought/sold millions and made a shit-ton of money.