It's going to depend on what spells the other guy has left.
What exactly was evil about the Lizard Cleric? Have we SEEN him do anything worse than raise a few zombies?I would think the two have a lot in common. Well, the evil part. Belkar doesn't seem to be as lawful.
Huh? Can someone explain to me what this means?
1. Malack is a vampire, so his "children" were actually just vampires he turned. 2. Belkar is officially soon to "breathe his last breath", and vampires don't breathe, so...
Ah, I didn't know Malack was a vampire. Thought he was just a lizard...wizard...guy.
Oh shit.Belkar as a vampire?!? Like that homicidal little bugger needed any more power!
That would officially be the greatest thing ever.It'd be hilarious if his alignment went in the opposite direction, as vampire turns often do, only his goes to Lawful Good.
I agree and disagree at the same time. I think that the style fits the comic and that the figures are expressive, but I don't think for a second that the art is wonderful. The comic survives because of storytelling and characters, not the art.Dave, there is a LOT of artistic talent going into those simple, iconic images. Just because it's simplified doesn't mean it's not great.
Burlew has plenty of artistic talent that he shows in the comic. Stick figures are a conscious choice, not a necessary evil.Think about this, though. The sheer fucking planning that went into this! How long ago was it announced about Belkar? I mean, we all assumed the easy way out and NONE of us saw this coming! Sheer bloody genius. And they are stick figures!!! Can you imagine someone with Scott Kurtz's artistic talent with this level of storytelling? Boggles the mind.
Yep.[DOUBLEPOST=1361223830][/DOUBLEPOST]I'm ... not sure I'm looking forward to whatever happens next.
Not to disparage you, Dave. I see where you're coming from. Stick figures are seen as "cheating" when drawing. Rich is known for his storytelling and for his simplistic artistic style, but make no mistake: His use of color, his devotion to the work, his talent with layout and flow all show that the stick figures are indeed done by choice. If anything, it is a testament to his ability to stage and execute that he is able to make these stick figures as expressive as they are. Much like XKCD or Samurai Jack*, I would instead say that his use of stick figures is "minimalist," not "simple."I agree and disagree at the same time. I think that the style fits the comic and that the figures are expressive, but I don't think for a second that the art is wonderful. The comic survives because of storytelling and characters, not the art.
I called fucking it.
I called it fucking.
As an example straight from this very comic, take a look atNot to disparage you, Dave. I see where you're coming from. Stick figures are seen as "cheating" when drawing. Rich is known for his storytelling and for his simplistic artistic style, but make no mistake: His use of color, his devotion to the work, his talent with layout and flow all show that the stick figures are indeed done by choice. If anything, it is a testament to his ability to stage and execute that he is able to make these stick figures as expressive as they are. Much like XKCD or Samurai Jack*, I would instead say that his use of stick figures is "minimalist," not "simple."