Idiots, that's why. People who can't take the time to learn proper spelling and punctuation always declare these things to be "arbitrary" or "stupid." In reality, they're just lazy morons.Why? Why? Why is this thing a thing?
Do it. Re-post your results here. I think it'd be amusing.I want to run over that website with a red pen.
He'll and we'll are improper grammar anyway...
Well I think the argument would be that things like "read" and "read" are two different words, but we can tell from context which is being used. I'm not advocating their position, mind you, just saying that it isn't necessarily necessary.The apostrophe is, in many cases, simply necessary because it separates words. "It's" is two words: IT IS. "Its" is one word. People who fail to see this baffle me.
To be fair it's (its that is) a member of the 's possession rule's exceptions.The apostrophe is, in many cases, simply necessary because it separates words. "It's" is two words: IT IS. "Its" is one word. People who fail to see this baffle me.
Man, that website is old. They want you to post their button onto your MySpace...
That's practically what the Germans do already.heyguysithinkallspacesandcapitalizationsareunnecessaryandaribitraryletsgetridofthosetoosowritingiseasierforeveryone.
I th'ink we sh'ould ac'tua'lly use m'ore apos'tr'ophes. Y'ou can't av'oid rea'ding th'is wi'th'out p'ausing at the a'pos'troph'es, c'an y'ou?
That's practically what the Germans do already.
English is tough.I think we should get rid of things like "ough". "Thru" works just as well as "through" and "tru" works just as well as "trough". Wait.
Damn it.
The European Union commissioners have announced that agreement has been reached to adopt English as the preferred language for European communications, rather than German, which was the other possibility. As part of the negotiations, Her Majesty's Government conceded that English spelling had some room for improvement and has accepted a five-year phased plan for what will be known as EuroEnglish (Euro for short).
In the first year, "s" will be used instead of the soft "c." Sertainly, sivil servants will resieve this news with joy. Also, the hard "c" will be replaced with "k". Not only will this klear up konfusion, but typewriters kan have one less letter.
There will be growing publik emthusiasm in the sekond year, when the troublesome "ph" will be replaced by "f". This will make words like fotograf" 20 persent shorter.
In the third year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted to reach the stage where more komplikated changes are possible. Governments will enkorage the removal of double letters, which have always ben a deterent to akurate speling. Also, al wil agre that the horible mes of silent "e"s in the languag is disgrasful, and they would go.
By the fourth year, peopl wil be reseptiv to steps such as replasing "th" by "z" and "w" by " v".
During ze fifz year, ze unesesary "o" kan be dropd from vords kontaining "ou", and similar changes vud of kors be aplid to ozer kombinations of leters.
After zis fifz yer, ve vil hav a reli sensibl riten styl. Zer vil be no mor trubls or difikultis and evrivun vil find it ezi tu understand ech ozer.
Ze drem vil finali kum tru.
Nah, we have this shit now in german. You know how I always cry whenever I read dolfin or amfetamin (only 2 examples I could think of that also work in english)?We should get rid of repetitive letters: k or q, one needs to go. Silent letters need to go. Ph? How about just using an F?
English is tough.
--Patrick