I was on my phone, I almost always post on my phone.Is your keyboard broken i mean i dont see any punctuation you just have this awful run on sentence word vomit
I was on my phone, I almost always post on my phone.Is your keyboard broken i mean i dont see any punctuation you just have this awful run on sentence word vomit
I would wager it is more likely to establish his conservative credentials to a wider audience and turn it into a business, a-la Newt Gingrich.Generally speaking, it's not very common for electable candidates who've lost previous elections to engage in consecutive elections. If Perry's not running for re-election, it's because he needs to distance himself from his failure in 2012 in order to become electable again. Even then, it's unlikely he'll ever see the same success again.
That's what they do when their political aspirations have dried up, so that would be the most obvious next move. It really does show where Republican priorities lie when most of the politically successful ones give up politics to make money on the convention circuit, while most Democrats turn their attention toward advancing actual causes.I would wager it is more likely to establish his conservative credentials to a wider audience and turn it into a business, a-la Newt Gingrich.
I think quite a few Democrats do that, but there are those few who turn it into a business. When Spitzer was disgraced he ended up on the talk show circuit, and we all know Al Gore turned his attention to making money by pushing clean fuels.That's what they do when their political aspirations have dried up, so that would be the most obvious next move. It really does show where Republican priorities lie when most of the politically successful ones give up politics to make money on the convention circuit, while most Democrats turn their attention toward advancing actual causes.
2016, Republicans realize that if they want to win, they have to be even more extreme religious right--dark ages style.
Rick Perry doesn't run for president again. While I'm sure he's delusional to try again, he won't. He'll end up going to Fox News as a contributor to condemn the lamestream media for not supporting him, joining all the other washed out conservatives with a persecution complex. Because he never caused anybody harm, you know.
I call bullshit. There's quite a few conservatives on both those networks, either with their own show or as contributors. The conservatives who end up on Fox get made fun of because they're always the people who can't handle having their views challenged.
Sure, why not? The liberals I've seen in Fox have either been wet noodles or else they get their mic pulled. THAT is why Fox gets so much shit from people. CNN is just sad and MSNBC is trying too hard to be liberal Fox. I honestly can't stand any cable 'news'.So, does that logic apply then to liberals who end up as contributors for Fox?
I use Jon Stewart and then Stephen Colbert. That way I get both sides. Am I doing it right?I agree with Krisken but I'll go one step further: ALL the 24 news channels are shit and people should be ashamed if they use them as a source of news.
Yes. You are doing it right.I use Jon Stewart and then Stephen Colbert. That way I get both sides. Am I doing it right?