I'm sorry, man. That's a rough feeling. If you want interview tips, let me know. I've been through and given a lot of them.Just tanked a job interview
I'm sorry, man. That's a rough feeling. If you want interview tips, let me know. I've been through and given a lot of them.Just tanked a job interview
Yeah, I could definitely use some tips. But a lot of my issues were lack of knowledge which upsets me more. Also it was a phone interview and I hate talking on the phone for extended periods of time.I'm sorry, man. That's a rough feeling. If you want interview tips, let me know. I've been through and given a lot of them.
A fact for which I was very thankful as a child. I love coconut, but I didn't like almonds back then. In fact, I learned to like dark chocolate because I'd trade with my sisters, getting Mounds in return.Fun size almond joys only have one almond per bar.
My stubby, sausage-like fingers are not the best for the fine dexterity needed to arrange the colors in order before inserting them into the connector. Longer fingernails (relatively speaking that is) help me more easily keep the wires in order and "unbend" them so they play nice.You need better tools if long fingernails are useful...
For a temporary fix, roll the battery rapidly back and forth while it is still seated in the slot. You can give it a tiny charge from your mechanical action.I wanted to watch a DVD this morning before work. My Blu-Ray Player's battery is dead. There are no other working AAA batteries in the house!
What the hell is it with making a remote control with only one bloody battery? No wonder it only held up to a week's heavy use.
Now I have to go to a store to buy a single AAA battery.
Really only useful for remotes. You won't give much to your RC car that way.Haha!
It at best gives it a little static charge.Wait, are you being serious? The only thing spinning the battery inside the holder might do for you is clean the contacts. It absolutely won't charge the battery. I suppose the heat from your hands might give a brief barely measurable boost to the current output as the battery warms up.
But the "mechanical action" will not generate a current or voltage at all, never mind provide a small charge to the battery.
The friction occurs at the contacts, not the outside of the battery.No, not even that is generated, and even if it were, how do you magically get the static charge that exists on the outside of the plastic coating on the outside of the battery to migrate to the cell in a way that would result in a charge?
This is assuming that rubbing the plastic covering the battery against the plastic of the holder generates a charge, which it shouldn't. Particularly since your hand is conducting any charge the plastic on the battery gains as you roll it back and forth.
I suppose that it's possible that the plastic battery holder inside the remote might gain a net charge, but again how does it know to migrate in the correct direction to provide current for the remote?
But even if you generated a static charge, you're talking about a very high voltage and very low current, very little power overall. Even if you could somehow direct the positive charge to the positive battery contact, and the negative to the negative, it wouldn't power the remote until it had enough power to damage the remote due to the high voltage.
I still don't see it working.
If it has worked for you in the past, then the are probably three things at play:
- contact cleaning due to the mechanical rubbing of the battery contacts against the holder contacts
- battery warming due to the contact with the hand while performing a vigorous activity
- battery resting. After a period of rest a battery will rebound a little bit and may release more current than it did when under constant use
Well, it's certainly testable, that's true.Start rubbing two metals together and give me a call when you generate a charge.
It doesn't work that way.
I'm going to go with increased current flow due to lowered resistance at contact points after mechanical removal of tarnish, myself.Hey, say what you will, I've gained WEEKS of power in remotes just by swapping the two batteries' positions in the remote when they were supposedly "dead."
Yeah, it really only works with electronics with a short duration low power draw, like pushing a button on a remote to fire a microsecond of IR data. Anything that does actual mechanical work is no-go.[DOUBLEPOST=1382559645,1382559564][/DOUBLEPOST]I'm going to go with increased current flow due to lowered resistance at contact points after mechanical removal of tarnish, myself.
For instance, I doubt you could increase the pulling capacity of a train by swapping the pull and push engines.
--Patrick
Buddy, Gold is $1350 an ounce right now. I'm content to leave this in the realm of apocrypha for now.This we can test. Coat both the battery terminals and the holder contacts with gold plating. Then, once they die, switch them and see if they continue to have life beyond the swap.
Sure. Honestly I am not an electrical engineer and don't have to tools to theorize, let alone challenge you on the whys involved. What I do have is: 1.) Remote won't operate due to drained battery (tested in repetition to frustration). 2.) Spin the battery in the remote. 2.) Remote works (for a little while). If I am mistaken on the reasons for it, then so be it. My advice still stands as a practical course of action (given my non-laboratory testing).http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Static_electricity
"A static electric charge is created whenever two surfaces contact and separate, and at least one of the surfaces has a high resistance to electrical current (and is therefore an electrical insulator). "
Doesn't work if both surfaces are conductors.
Exactly. I have trouble with my starter right now. Have had trouble for going on 2 years now. If I rock the steering wheel back and forth vigorously, the car will eventually start. "Experts" have told me that I am probably loosening up the bendix, or reseating the contacts, or rotating the flywheel slightly, or flexing the starter housing, or some other thing.My advice still stands as a practical course of action (given my non-laboratory testing).
I've tested a pair of batteries that had been used together in a device, and one read as having more current than the other. I don't know how it works, but batteries in a remote don't drain at the same rate, and they will work inserted in one order and not in another, no matter how much they're wiggled and twisted in place.I'm going to go with increased current flow due to lowered resistance at contact points after mechanical removal of tarnish, myself.
For instance, I doubt you could increase the pulling capacity of a train by swapping the pull and push engines.
--Patrick
It's not the same to me without Layne Staley.No one told me there was a new Alice in Chains album. I'm now going to listen to grinding grunge for the next hour in anger over this.
It's still good stuff, but yeah, not the same for sure. Though Jerry Cantrell is no slouch.It's not the same to me without Layne Staley.
So, I think this video proves that writing this song was just pulling a 'usual suspects' while bar hopping down mainstreet.It's still good stuff, but yeah, not the same for sure. Though Jerry Cantrell is no slouch.
If someone were to have me listen to this and tell me it was from 2013, I'd probably call them a liar.
Ok, for those who didn't get it, apparently if you don't have the Flash plug-in installed, the embedded YouTube links show up as a block of garbage text, which is what I saw on another computer instead of the Alice in Chains video waiting to be clicked.Is that a ClarisWorks document?
Oh. I thought it was saying the neon lyrics looked like wordart or something.Ok, for those who didn't get it, apparently if you don't have the Flash plug-in installed, the embedded YouTube links show up as a block of garbage text, which is what I saw on another computer instead of the Alice in Chains video waiting to be clicked.
--Patrick
Holidays are coming...]Note to self: It's OK to tell potential clients "no."