Dave
Staff member
No it isn't.
No it isn't.
Brace yourself. Disagrees incoming.No it isn't.
I loved that so much.We're The Millers is worth it for the "Waterfalls" scene and the last outtake / prank in the credits based on that scene alone.
Are you ready for 22 Jump Street this year?21 Jump Street- I actually came in wanting to hate the movie, so the fact that it genuinely made me laugh is pretty impressive.
I'm actually kind of annoyed knowing that you won't be able to determine what is real and what isn't. I feel that the film would be better knowing that he actually does something with his life, rather than sit there contemplating whether or not he actually did.The Secret Life of Walter Mitty
The missus wanted to see this.
Not too bad. Not amazing, and I'll probably forget about it in a few weeks, but its premise is interesting and relateable enough.
In particular, though, I appreciate how the movie makes you wonder what is real and what is not. Spoilers ahoy:
I personally think everything from the Greenland trip onwards is a massive daydream. There are too many unrealistic events, such as getting cell phone reception in the middle of the Himalayas, the over-dramatic shark attack, skateboarding perfectly down a lengthy and bendy road, and heck, even trading the Stretch Armstrong for the skateboard. However, I think the movie knows audiences are looking out for these inconsistencies, so they also have a bit of fun with it, making sure everything stretches plausibility, but never outright shatters it.
It's a good thing Jennifer Aniston has a sense of humor, or that outtake could have gone a completely different way.We're the Millers
Okay, that was pretty good. Wasn't crazy about some of the overly crude humour or over-reliance on the "Fuck Crutch" as a writing teacher called it once, but still pretty good. It got a couple of good laughs out of me, most especially that last outtake at the end of the movie as others have mentioned.
"... Brenda?" "Dick!"It's a good thing Jennifer Aniston has a sense of humor, or that outtake could have gone a completely different way.
21 Jump Street- I actually came in wanting to hate the movie, so the fact that it genuinely made me laugh is pretty impressive.
He's also excellent in "Reign Over Me". It seems that when he's got a real director and dials back the stupid shit he's actually really good. Too bad he hardly ever takes jobs where he can show it.If anyone ever wants to know if Adam Sandler can actually act, they need to watch this.
That's what I like so much about Dark City. It's like a pulp novel translated directly to the screen.Right out of a pulp novel feel, which I like.
You mean the movie Matrix ripped all of it's ideas from?Don't even get started on how awesome Dark City is.
I was watching Caillou with my son the other day, which is heavy with voice-over, and I realized that voice-over is okay for little kids. Sometimes they need things explained to them. But a good film needs no voice-over. That's my new mantra: Voice-over is for babies.The Director's Cut of Dark City is even better. The scenes which were taken out really help explain some thing which weren't entirely clear in the theatrical release and not having the beginning voice over is how I wish I had been introduced to the movie.
I would argue that it is easy to abuse, and is thus usually abused. Just about any rule of writing can and has been broken to great effect, but the "rules" are more like guidelines to good writing. Only an experienced writer is likely to be able to bend or break the rules because they have a deep understanding of the form.Voiceover can be done well. I believe the voiceover at the beginning of Disney's Beauty and the Beast as though it were from a story book was appropriate. I suppose they could have chose many other paths and times to tell that story, but I don't think voiceover is a bad technique that can't be used well, merely one that is typically used poorly.