All of box office is driven by the first weekend, Captain America opening on its ~5th week won't really matter at allI think that might just be worse for them. It means they'll have a good opening weekend and then get trounced by Cap..
All of box office is driven by the first weekend, Captain America opening on its ~5th week won't really matter at allI think that might just be worse for them. It means they'll have a good opening weekend and then get trounced by Cap..
Fifth week? Are you drunk again? May 6 would be the the week after the last week of April.[DOUBLEPOST=1394758708,1394758655][/DOUBLEPOST]All of box office is driven by the first weekend, Captain America opening on its ~5th week won't really matter at all
It's worse than that. It's a Batman/SUPERMAN movie being afraid of Captain America.That's the world we live in. Where a Batman movie is afraid of Captain America.
Can you imagine that 25 years ago?
???There's some talk that S/B will be moved to the first weekend of April,
Whoops, my bad. It was the end of April. And I meant the last week. Yeah, that's my fault.
Superman Returns wasn't a reboot.Marvel is essentially dictating the super hero genre at this point with marvelous skill. Batman has run it's course and needs a reboot. Superman has already be rebooted twice and not to the reception they had desired. Lets not mention the other movie. Where as Marvel has systematically put out movies that have all worked together and build towards greater brand recognition and acceptance, resulting in the largest opening weekend box office in history. Batman vs Superman has already run away from one Marvel movie, can they survive if they dare to move it again?
Well, it sort of was. It was a soft reboot, like the second Hulk movie. New actors, but same universe.Superman Returns wasn't a reboot.
And the stuff that is/was good ether got dropped or wouldn't work as TV show/movie. So no All Star Western starring Jonah Hex or Demon Knights.I don't think even that would work at this point, Ashburner. I don't know if you're familiar, but right now DC comics, with only a few exceptions, are pretty terrible right now. I don't think letting the creative teams behind the comics take the reigns would be any better.
....Wonder Woman?Can't really think of anything else.
This is the point, but with a twist. As I've stated before, I think the reason the MCU is working as well as it is is that they have people who know how to update a story without making the mistake that "for adults" = "gritty". I think I fall into the majority of people who read a select few comics if any, and when I try to read some of the source material for, let's say, Iron Man, I'm struck by just how silly it seems. The mastery at Marvel is that they continue to work that stuff in somehow (Cap's stage costume is a brilliant example) without making the whole thing campy OR overly serious. DC needs to find someone who understands that balance.Disney is making SO MUCH FUCKING MONEY by letting comic book stuff BE comic book stuff.
No, Adult Swim . . . maybe. Toonami, just friggin' no.Constantine a 6-10 episode gritty drama on Toonami?
Yeah, if they wanted to go totally ballsy (no pun intended), they'd start the JLA franchise with Wonder Woman. I've said it a million times, but they could've easily fleshed out Gail Simone's script from the animated movie some years back and made it into a live action film.....Wonder Woman?
Seriously, this is my biggest gripe with DC's decisions (besides Batman fatigue). They're sitting on one of the biggest and most influential figures in comics, and with a little effort, they could probably bring in a new audience of girls who think comics and superheroes "are for boys", in addition to the current comic fans. To to mention they'd beat Marvel/Disney in the one place they haven't explored: for all the Black Widows and Sifs and X-Women, NONE of them have lead they're own movie or cartoon yet. But frankly, I'd still trust Disney to do it first, because Warner Bros., as told by Paul Dini, has gone on record saying there's no value in a "girl audience"
Yeah, that's very true. Off the top of my head, She-Hulk is the first I think of for carrying her own title, and a lot of the others occasionally got mini-series. Even poor Shulkie is a derivative of the Hulk. I think in the hands of a decent writer, they could make some interesting solo projects for Marvel. There are some great women writers our there, and there are guys like Neil Gaiman and Terry Moore who write amazing female characters. It can be done, but the old myth that "women don't read comics/aren't interested in superheroes/etc" is hard to kill.Yeah, if they wanted to go totally ballsy (no pun intended), they'd start the JLA franchise with Wonder Woman. I've said it a million times, but they could've easily fleshed out Gail Simone's script from the animated movie some years back and made it into a live action film.
You know, I was having a conversation with a friend of mine the other day about Marvel female heroes. While they have a number of strong female characters, there are few that really have a deep enough mythology, own villains, or supporting cast to support their own solo book or movie. Most of them are related first with teams, such as any of the X-Women, the Avengers, etc. None of them are really iconic on their own. DC, on the other hand, has Wonder Woman, Black Canary (or just Birds of Prey in general), Zatanna. Even Batgirl, Batwoman, and Supergirl, while related with the character they spun off from have enough they could support their own solo books or even movie. In most cases, you can even name some key villains for each of them.
Marvel women...don't really have that. They're all primarily team players.
Aquaman? Honestly I think they may be better off forgetting about reasonably well known superheroes & just trying to find one that can hit the same sort of action / comedy tone of IM1. Jaime Reyes Blue Beetle maybe?Iron Man, the first of the MCU movies, struck a pretty good balance between "unexpected" and "widely known about", I think. Not necessarily a universal household name like Spider-Man or the X-Men, but still pretty popular.
Who would be a DC equivalent of that?
I think a Booster Gold movie would only work if he had Ted Kord Blue Beetle with him. They have such a great chemistry that it would be the perfect action comedy movie.Booster Gold movie would be amazing.
I know it's not DC but it could be cool if they did it the way they ran Supreme Powers, just had her as this aloof goddess who kills for funOn Wonder Woman - Yeah, this could work, but only if they aren't afraid to have her utterly dominating the mooks in her movies. I want to see her just manhandling dudes... breaking arms, using a sword, cracking skull... she needs to be the "overt" force that nether Batman or Superman are.
Then that's no longer Wonder Woman.I know it's not DC but it could be cool if they did it the way they ran Supreme Powers, just had her as this aloof goddess who kills for fun