Hm, that's a good point. It is very aesthetic but dry.I haven't seen Manhunter, but I saw Nostalgia Critic's comparison and thought it looked like a more interesting movie.
I don't hate Red Dragon, but I don't ever feel like watching it. It looks nice, but I feel like the content falls flat.
Manhunter is another of those movies I own but haven't seen yet. I got it before I knew it was part of the continuity, just because it was in the bargain bin and I wanted that movie that had William Petersen pre-CSI. Kati has watched it, she thought it was entertaining.I haven't seen Manhunter, but I saw Nostalgia Critic's comparison and thought it looked like a more interesting movie.
It's technically out of continuity though; Red Dragon is in canon with the other Hannibal Lector movies. Which is unfortunate, especially if it's the better movie.Manhunter is another of those movies I own but haven't seen yet. I got it before I knew it was part of the continuity, just because it was in the bargain bin and I wanted that movie that had William Petersen pre-CSI. Kati has watched it, she thought it was entertaining.
--Patrick
Well, it was (ironically) a disneyfied version of the events that transpired. Supposedly Travers never really forgave Disney for ruining her story.Saving Mr. Banks. Phenomenal movie. Tom Hanks is very enjoyable as Walt Disney, and Emma Thompson is fantastic as the tortured P.L. Travers. The whole thing is a journey for Travers to eventually deal with a horrifically tragic past. I will seriously never be able to watch Mary Poppins the same way again knowing the true backstory to it. It's just heartbreaking.
Indeed, she didn't like what Walt was doing with her story. The film does address that, by the way.Well, it was (ironically) a disneyfied version of the events that transpired. Supposedly Travers never really forgave Disney for ruining her story.
I didn't like it nearly as much as you apparently did. There were a few things that made me smile, but I was pretty bored throughout. I thought it was going to have more of the Mystery Inc charm I've come to love but it was a straight more old school shilly Scooby Doo crossover. SO FUCKING SHILLY.Scooby Doo! WrestleMania Mystery
It was amazing. AMAZING! It was seriously a lot of fun. I totally play on watching it again very soon.
I did! Thought it was a hilarious extra Easter egg.I didn't like it nearly as much as you apparently did. There were a few things that made me smile, but I was pretty bored throughout. I thought it was going to have more of the Mystery Inc charm I've come to love but it was a straight more old school shilly Scooby Doo crossover. SO FUCKING SHILLY.
Did you notice this Nick?
A good portion of the female cast of Young Justice watching Wrestlemania.
In agreeance with this, though I would like to say Final Wars had some of the best action scenes in the series. And yeah "All Out Attack" was just okay. Plus its weird how they made King Ghidorah a good guy, every other movie he's this crushing alien force but not in this one.Godzilla: Final Wars. Not the best in the series, certainly not the worst. If I was to rank it against the other films of the Millenium Series it would probably be tied or between Godzilla 2000 and Godzilla vs Megaguirus. The worst of that set being Giant Monsters All Out Attack! and the best being the Tokyo S.O.S. and Godzilla X Mechagodzilla films.
He was in prison for being too badass. One of the greatest things I've ever seen on screen.[DOUBLEPOST=1395948726,1395948523][/DOUBLEPOST]Man, I loved Final Wars. It just kept getting more and more ridiculous until you were swimming in it.
Don Fry was pretty fun as well as the manliest man who ever manned.
I hear it's spectacular, and that Russell Crowe does a good job.Noah. I'm sure some folks don't like all the things added to a Biblical story for entertainment's sake, but all in all this was a great movie.
Wut.I haven't seen it yet either. I hear it gets pretty watermelon-y.
From what I read on Salon, it manufactures industrialist villains out of whole cloth (as in, not based on anything in the story's source) and makes them super hyper dirty-polluting-angry-mean-and-beastly industrialist people, to contrast with the earth-friendly agrarian vegetarian magic-trees-make-everything-work-out hippy noah types, and turns a religious story into another story about how human endeavor ruins the earth. Which is a common thread in most watermelon environmentalist screeds.Wut.
So you were okay with the whole "man builds a boat and loads two of every animal onto it to escape god's wrath" part... but the NEW stuff is what pushed it too far?Noah. I'm sure some folks don't like all the things added to a Biblical story for entertainment's sake, but all in all this was a great movie.
A lot of people had problems with Peter Jackson shoe-horning in the warg-riders battle scene and the superfluous Eowyn-Aragorn love triangle into Two Towers, too.So you were okay with the whole "man builds a boat and loads two of every animal onto it to escape god's wrath" part... but the NEW stuff is what pushed it too far?
Er, did you actually read my post or just glance at it?So you were okay with the whole "man builds a boat and loads two of every animal onto it to escape god's wrath" part... but the NEW stuff is what pushed it too far?
I didn't say anywhere in there that I had an issue with it.[DOUBLEPOST=1396290159,1396289989][/DOUBLEPOST]I'm sure some folks don't like all the things added to a Biblical story for entertainment's sake, but all in all this was a great movie.
Ah. Yeah, that's pretty much exactly how it is. Cain's descendants are, evil, ruinous bastards and Noah's family is all about that Earth.From what I read on Salon, it manufactures industrialist villains out of whole cloth (as in, not based on anything in the story's source) and makes them super hyper dirty-polluting-angry-mean-and-beastly industrialist people, to contrast with the earth-friendly agrarian vegetarian magic-trees-make-everything-work-out hippy noah types, and turns a religious story into another story about how human endeavor ruins the earth. Which is a common thread in most watermelon environmentalist screeds.
I had never heard this term, but for the too-lazy-to-click folks, I discovered it means "green on the outside, red on the inside."
Or more literally, communism/social justice/anticapitalism disguised as environmentalism. But yes.I had never heard this term, but for the too-lazy-to-click folks, I discovered it means "green on the outside, red on the inside."
--Patrick
Gallagher's in this?! AWESOME!I haven't seen it yet either. I hear it gets pretty watermelon-y.
Wait, Gallagher I or Gallagher II? Could decide whether I go and see this.Gallagher's in this?! AWESOME!