Random Video Game Crap

Steam service is shit. I've gotten pretty lucky (usually 1-2 day wait) but EA has it beat.

I forgot my online password, using an e-mail I don't have access to anymore. Submit online ticket with little hope, my phone rings WITHIN A MINUTE.

It's some American dude, super friendly, asked me a few questions, I offered him the details and volunteers pictures of ID and so forth, wasn't necessary, I answered my questions, 10 minutes later, e-mail account changed and I got my data. Now, I feel that it was a bit too easy but I got what I wanted, I changed my password with added more account security for future EA games.

Maybe
 
Steam service is shit. I've gotten pretty lucky (usually 1-2 day wait) but EA has it beat.

I forgot my online password, using an e-mail I don't have access to anymore. Submit online ticket with little hope, my phone rings WITHIN A MINUTE.

It's some American dude, super friendly, asked me a few questions, I offered him the details and volunteers pictures of ID and so forth, wasn't necessary, I answered my questions, 10 minutes later, e-mail account changed and I got my data. Now, I feel that it was a bit too easy but I got what I wanted, I changed my password with added more account security for future EA games.

Maybe
Blizzard customer service has always been top notch for me. Every time I've ever had to call them, the hold time was extremely low, I got someone extremely helpful and friendly, and one time even traded pokemon strategy with one while he researched what had happened to my account.
 
Blizzard has, far and away, been the best CS I've ever dealt with. Almost never get a canned response, they're easy to deal with, and can almost always solve problems quickly and efficiently. I've had to deal with everything from a hacked account and mischarges to having a character restored (before the option to do so).
 
America clearly has different Blizzard CS than Europe. I don't think I've ever even been helped in the right language.

Anyway - Steam offers, just like a lot of other "important" sites plenty of ways to identify. I can only assume the customer with that story never activated an authenticator, added a phone number or anything like that. Mind you, I haven't, either, for privacy reasons - but that does mean that when you're in troubel, proving ownership is extra tricky.
 
To be fair, even your country can't decide on a single language.

--Patrick
Sure, but the international insistence of addressing the whole country by a minority language (6.5million Dutch speaking, 3.5million French speaking) grates. Especailly since it was the oppressor's language and all that jazz. International insistence of judging the country by French media's output is similar and not very helpful.
 
You've genuinely enlightened me a little bit about Belgium, Bubble. Thank you. I always thought French language was a vast majority there.
 
You've genuinely enlightened me a little bit about Belgium, Bubble. Thank you. I always thought French language was a vast majority there.
There are approximately 11 million Belgians. 6.5 million list Dutch as their first language, 3.5 list French, about 500K are officially German-speaking and another 500K are "miscellaneous" (English and Arab mostly).
In 1815 Napoleon lost at Waterloo. The Belgian region was added onto the Netherlands, since the populace pretty much spoke the same language. Nobility and bourgeoisie were French-speaking, though, installed by Napoleon, or earlier - Flanders has been a part of France, the Netherlands, Spain, Austria, Rome, parts have even belonged to England. In 1831 already ,the French-speaking nobility, who felt oppressed by William of Orange's intentions to completely Dutchify the language in all of the Netherlands, revolted and separated. What is currently Belgium is made up of the remnants of the Southern Netherlands (the Catholic part, in contrast to the Protestant North during the Renaissance), parts of Northern France which were added on to provide a Dutch buffer between France and Germany at the time, and most of the Liège Prince-Bishop's domain which was annexed by Napoleon, and, well, nobody thought it worthwhile to refound it as a proper country.
Anyway, the French-speaking nobility and elite overreacted as usually happens throughout the ages, and Dutch was completely eradicated as a cultural language for almost a century - all education, all laws, all culture, all justice, all science etc was in French only - by law. Dutch was "a peasant's language" and "uncultured". Obviously, middle classes (insofar as those existed at the time) slowly adapted and soon enough speaking Dutch was a good way of identifying yourself as base and a farmer, certainly nothing noble or intelligent. Translating laws was illegal; publishing Dutch books was illegal, and so forth. It was an excellent tool of keeping the poor and downtrodden poor and well-trod upon.
Around the change of the century, a Flemish cultural identity was slowly reinstating itself; coupled (at the time) with socialism and christian democracy: those standing up for the poor, laborers, etc obviously saw uplifting their language to acceptable as yet another important way of destabilizing the elite. The First World War saw many (though by far not all) people from the Flemish movement collaborating with German invaders as they spoke a similar language, promised cultural and linguistic independence and so forth. Obviously, the Germans lost, and the Flemish movement was branded traitors and all that. We "gained" a part of Germany as reparations for the damage in the war (which is mostly where those 500K German-speaking Belgians still live). By the Second World War, the Flemish movement was often marginalized and pushed aside - again, many of them collaborated with the Germans for, once again, promises of cultural independence and freedom. Again, the Germans lost, and again, everyone who strived for Flemish independence or acceptance were branded collaborators.
It wasn't until 1968 that the first university with courses in Dutch was established. Even now, there's still a lot of animosity, especially in some regions, between the two language groups. The Dutch-speaking are generally richer and economically more successful (the economic boom in Belgium was in large part due to coal and iron ore; when these became too expensive or ran out, Flanders successfully converted to other industries - Wallonia didn't. There are still steel mills in Belgium, processing ore from India at horrendous cost and heavily subsidized. Our car assembly industry is slowly drying up but not quite gone yet), and culturally we're slowly overtaking the French speaking people abroad. The French speaking are/were the main players in diplomatic affairs, administration, media and most of our nobility.
There's still a lot of Flemish people who feel they're still paying for the French speaking people, and being abused and taken advantage of; on the other side there's lots of French speaking people who feel the Flemish are usurping Belgium and dismantling it out of selfishness and shortsightedness. It doesn't help that there's a huge difference in political views and so on between the two communities, and, especially since the 1960s/1970s, a growing lack of understanding or common knowledge - Wallonia has focussed culturally on France, while Flanders looked more to the Netherlands and Germany. We're slowly drifting apart, and some try to speed up the process while some wish to slow it down.

For an example of unbalancedness, Flanders accounts for 85% of exports and 80% of all economic activity; pays 80+% of all social security; while Wallonia receives 60% of all social security. In parliament, despite the disparity in population size, both communities get exactly half of all seats - meaning a French speaking person's vote is worth more than that of a Flemish person. And so on. There's a reason our country doesn't work :-P


...I was going to write 3 lines to explain why there's more Dutch speaking people but you don't see us as often. Sorry.
 
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, mei ut accumsan hendrerit, alii propriae pro at. Usu essent prodesset et, qui te definitiones reprehendunt. Mel probo equidem lobortis et. Nusquam convenire at vim. Eam ut quem mediocrem eloquentiam, noster accusam menandri eum te.
Eam probo nemore elaboraret ei. Zril molestie delicata ea pro. Te denique mentitum officiis pri, at sed munere aeterno. Cu hendrerit elaboraret qui, in zril molestie aliquando pri, ei nam ipsum delicata gloriatur. Tollit vidisse equidem sed an, hinc velit suscipit sea ei.
At audire delenit quo, nec ne solum tantas. Conceptam definitionem eam in, modus populo putent ea vel. Cu habemus recteque adipiscing pri, porro admodum officiis ne has. Has an elit omnis, te decore dolorem nostrum has. Sed illum regione theophrastus ne. Per at eligendi scaevola, eos et assum error.
Choro placerat percipitur ne mea, at eos tantas omittantur contentiones. Sit no saepe ocurreret, ad pri prompta nonumes maiestatis. Mel meliore detracto in, expetenda omittantur persequeris ad est, mei solet argumentum in. Et dolorem efficiendi mea. Vix id paulo nostro oportere, luptatum efficiendi necessitatibus nec cu.
Ad per volutpat adversarium, vivendum argumentum mei ut. Est enim blandit id, pro gubergren euripidis assentior ut, ludus pertinacia cotidieque in his. Vix et fastidii omnesque, per te case feugait consequat, ius accusam senserit intellegam ne. Vel duis verear repudiare no. Has ad falli oratio quidam, movet abhorreant in sea, ad sit detracto quaestio.
Thank you, that was quite informative.

--Patrick
 
Clearly. You never explained the only thing about the French/Flemish divide that matters.



Who makes all the delicious beer ?
The monasteries :-P It's actually split relatively fairly. That is, there's about as many good beers on both sides of the language divide - so per capita the French speaking have more special beers. On the other hand, both the very biggest (AB Inbev - Stella, Bush etc) and the very best ones (West-Vleteren e.a.) are from the Dutch-speaking region. On both sides, it's really the quality of the water that determines the quality of the beer, so it's the more rural areas that score higher.
Unless you're like me and like geuzes and other beers of spontaneous gestation - those are only native to Brussels and the surrounding area. Though heavily frenchified, that's still Flanders and officially Dutch-speaking - with all but one geuze breweries being in Dutch-speaking hands.
Fries are a Dutch-speaking thing originally.
Waffles I honestly don't know.
Chocolate is open for discussion - even the Dutch claim having "invented" chocolate as we know it. For the past century or so, chocolate's mostly been an art form practiced on the French side of things, though.
 
It's interesting to me how many gamers are so adamantly against thinking critically about video games. Take this article/video, for example. Specifically, the comments. I'm having a discussion with someone on there (I'm Redwave247; old name I wish I could change). They don't understand why a game can't be just a game. Why do we need to break them down all the time? Hilariously, the games he listed as examples of ones he enjoyed? I was able to find something about them to analyze without barely giving it much thought.

Maybe it's my background in English Literature. For me, I can enjoy plenty of entertainment on the surface, but because of my education, I can't help but think critically and dig deeper. I see symbolism or metaphors in everything, whether it was intentional or not. I can do both. That's what makes all forms of entertainment so great. You can enjoy it for what it is but you can also think about it.

And yet, this seems to be the reaction whenever many people want to discuss video games. How dare they analyze or criticize my precious time waster! Don't they know that games are just that? Games? That there's nothing behind them? That the developers don't put any forethought into creating these? I just wanna mash buttons and hit the baddies. I don't wanna think about how Batman might make for good discussion on persona duality or the effect of vigilantism on a socio-political environment! I just wanna run bad guys over with the Batmobile!
 
Oh gross, you have to buy Rare Replay to actually get to keep Rash forever. Fuck off.
Actually, you don't need to do that. You can get him by purchasing some Killer Instinct downloadable content. What they're currently doing with Rash is actually more akin to a data. You can join in now, or watch until Season Three of Killer Instinct launches.
 
Hee-hee, I just saw this.
The Smart car that just says, "That's it, I'm out" and goes down to the beach is hilarious.
People in this city must drive cars made of nitrocellulose and bathe in lighter fluid on their way to work...which they will doggedly try to get to regardless of what's in their way.

--Patrick
 
On one hand, I always laugh a bit when I see all those WOW-fans who've "quit for good" get interested again at each and every mention of an expansion.
On the other hand, here I sit, thinking "gee, the new Diablo III patch notes sound interesting, maybe I should start up again next season...."

At least Blizzard's software drugs are more fun than P2W mobile games I guess....*sigh*
 
On one hand, I always laugh a bit when I see all those WOW-fans who've "quit for good" get interested again at each and every mention of an expansion.
On the other hand, here I sit, thinking "gee, the new Diablo III patch notes sound interesting, maybe I should start up again next season...."

At least Blizzard's software drugs are more fun than P2W mobile games I guess....*sigh*
Yeah I'm totally guilty of it with WoW. Played the game since launch on and off and at the end of the day had more good times than bad. It's much more casual-play friendly than other MMOs, and pretty easy to dive back into after time away. Sometimes it's easier to just jump into the comfortable game than it is to push through the new ones.
 
Top