I know it's not exactly topical, and I'm not really a console gamer anyway, but I always thought Fire Emblem characters didn't belong in Smash Bros games. Basically, I'm of the opinion that if a sizeable number of people's first time they hear of a character is in Smash, it probably shouldn't be in smash. Same goes for Shulk. And I know there's a lot of Fire Emblem fans out there who will quote sales numbers at me all day long, but the fact remains that Marth showed up in Smash in the west before any actual Fire Emblem games did... and now SSB4, there's FOUR fire emblem characters?
And really, when I say "Nintendo," is your first thought "Lucina?" If you ask me (and I know you didn't), there needs to be a certain threshold met for "iconicism" here... I mean, that's why Mr. Game and Watch kinda makes sense - he was an early icon of handheld gaming, and why Snake is palatable despite being completely thematically dischordant. But really... Dark Pit? What is this, Sakurai just pimping his side projects? I mean, yeah, Kid Icarus is iconic because of its 8 bit cred, but Palutena wasn't even playable from what I understand. Dark Pit is just fuckin' ridiculous, "Shadow Link" from Zelda 2 doesn't get a slot.
Anyway, just my unsolicited 2 cents about a game I've played less at this point than I've ever played Skifree.