Check out the 4 hour Tolkien Edit. It's all three movies condensed down into one movie that is actually about the Hobbit and doesn't suck.The Hobbit: Battle of the Five Armies
Not quite as horrible as I'd been led to believe, but yeah... this movie has some problems. Still though, going in with low expectations helped.
I also endorse this. Condensed down to about four hours, it's an enjoyable, fun adventure.Check out the 4 hour Tolkien Edit. It's all three movies condensed down into one movie that is actually about the Hobbit and doesn't suck.
https://tolkieneditor.wordpress.com/
Huh. I knew a fan make was inevitable, but I didn't know it was done already. I'll have to check it up.Check out the 4 hour Tolkien Edit. It's all three movies condensed down into one movie that is actually about the Hobbit and doesn't suck.
https://tolkieneditor.wordpress.com/
See, that's what throws me off about it. The better quality acting sets up expectations that don't pay off for me. Instead you get B effects with A acting, which is off-putting. To me anyway.There's a bizarre charm to the movies, for the most part. The movies are obviously shot with a tight budget but they make it work, by and large. Most of the cast are steadily-working character actors so they do their parts pretty well, with a few exceptions. They're not great movies but they're easy to watch.
Tell that to the critics: they've been dumping on the movie because it's not scary, not knowing it's not supposed to be a horror movie. This is why directors quit the craft.Crimson Peak: I'm glad Guillermo del Toro has made such a point of telling people this is not a horror movie (as advertised), but a gothic romance, because just going off the trailers I'd have been disappointed. My wife knew what it was and was still disappointed, actually.
OH HELL! the trailer looked terrible! 500 times terrible is God awful.But no, think about how bad it could be. Then think about the fact that the trailer makes the movie seem 100x better than it is.
Also liked it. Very spooky and moody, and I love when movies aren't completely dank and brown/gray. The audience was fun--lots of big reactions. I sat in front of a really nervous lady. As for your spoiler, I'll take whatever I can get, and it was spectacular.Crimson Peak: I'm glad Guillermo del Toro has made such a point of telling people this is not a horror movie (as advertised), but a gothic romance, because just going off the trailers I'd have been disappointed. My wife knew what it was and was still disappointed, actually.
I enjoyed it a lot. There's only so much you can do in an old and narrow genre before it stops being that genre and del Toro clearly wanted to indulge in gothic tropes. If del Toro was doing a horror movie, the ghosts wouldn't be jumping out screeching and covered in blood. He's done horror; he knows how to key the suspense. This is a colorful movie with giant, old houses, dark moods, and blood (or red clay) decorations. I was into it the whole way; it's a beautiful film to look at and stayed interesting throughout.
On the subject of Tom Hiddleston's nudity:
So interviews and social media have been really building this up, so I was prepared to see some full-on dick. Nope. There's a quick shot of his ass ... that's it. I think the women I know who have been eager to see this largely for Hiddleston's nudity are going to be a little disappointed.
It's hard to get mad at them when the advertising has been all about it being a horror movie. Even the before-show stuff that AMC does said "before you watch this scary movie ..."Tell that to the critics: they've been dumping on the movie because it's not scary, not knowing it's not supposed to be a horror movie. This is why directors quit the craft.
Definitely one of my favorite newer movies.Tucker and Dale Vs. Evil
A really funny subversion of the Hillbilly Horror genre. A group of too-dumb-to-live college students and a failure to communicate ruins the weekend of rednecks Tucker and Dale, who are doing some repairs to their new vacation home in West Virginia. Bloody, hilarious, well worth watching.
I was terrified of spiders for YEARS after that fucking movie.Remember when all the trailers played off Arachnophobia as a comedy about a wacky exterminator? Yeah, I was.. 9 I think? NOT WHAT I EXPECTED.
And it was never supposed to be a horror movie. Actors, director, everyone who worked on making the movie said so. But WB probably thought this was the only way to sell it.Yeah, Crimson Peak was pretty good. Not all that frightening, so I wouldn't really classify it as a horror movie. The acting was solid, the visuals were very pretty, and the story kept my interest.
Although Charlie Hunnam simply can't do an American accent to save his life.
And it was never supposed to be a horror movie. Actors, director, everyone who worked on making the movie said so. But WB probably thought this was the only way to sell it.
I liked that it was a bit of a red herring movie. (I hadn't heard any press stuff about how it wasn't really a horror movie.) From the trailers, I was thinking--the way that the siblings were talking--some kind of virgin sacrifice to soothe angry spirits movie? I thought of that again when the sister made some comment to her about whether or not they'd had sex yet. Were they dead miners because of the clay angle? As it went on, it became more apparent, and it was fun to watch it unfold. I'm sure other people figured it out before I did, but I think I willfully stupefy myself during movies a bit because I enjoy being surprised.
Dude, Captain America is more current on his movies than you are at this point.I still haven't seen it (big surprise, I know), but I remember that during the Oscars for that year, one of the envelopes was delivered by a robotic spider lowered to the podium from up above (ostensibly as one of the "stars" of Arachnophobia).
--Patrick
Yeah, but he made a list!Dude, Captain America is more current on his movies than you are at this point.
The first half was a good setup. I loved it.
I wonder if the Jane Eyre-like monologue that Tom Hiddleston spouted off to Edith was intentional...kind of appealing to her lit fangirl side? Am I getting the timing completely wrong here, or would that book have been around at that time? I'm talking about the "our hearts are connected and we shouldn't be seperated" thing he said. It sounded a lot like the "I have a string from my heart to yours" thing that Rochester says in Jane Eyre.
Maybe? I don't know.I more meant the character himself was trying to make himself appealing by semi-referencing a book.
Dude, Captain America has always been more current on his movies than me.Dude, Captain America is more current on his movies than you are at this point.
Then get thee to a Redbox, muthafucka!Dude, Captain America has always been more current on his movies than me.
I still haven't seen Casablanca, Gone With the Wind, The Grapes of Wrath, The Maltese Falcon, Birth of a Nation, King Kong, The Philadelphia Story, etc.
--Patrick
Eh, I'd probably need to create an account with them to do that. Pass.Then get thee to a Redbox, muthafucka!
Have you seen the Wizard of Oz?Dude, Captain America has always been more current on his movies than me.
I still haven't seen Casablanca, Gone With the Wind, The Grapes of Wrath, The Maltese Falcon, Birth of a Nation, King Kong, The Philadelphia Story, etc.
--Patrick
Several times, but only on television.Have you seen the Wizard of Oz?
Well then, there's probably at least one reference you'd get.Several times, but only on television.
--Patrick
Ooo, you mean like in "A Fistful of Yen?"Well then, there's probably at least one reference you'd get.
Well then, there's probably at least one reference you'd get.
I doubt any of those are in a Redbox unless there was a recent re-release. The Redboxes I've seen only carry new releases. He'd need a Netflix account.Then get thee to a Redbox, muthafucka!