I somehow don't see that happening, to make an understatement.That can change with the most sensible thing Hillary could ever do in her lifetime.
Clinton/Sanders '16.
... what?Everyone thought the Hillary is 44 people would hand the election to McCain for a while, too
There's another, more final solution:"No third parties, no "not voting"" restricts the options more than the actual election. Even if I could vote, I'd vote for neither.
I was gonna reply with "Has Hillary really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?'... what?
EDIT: Oh I get it now, "Hillary is 44" is an organization. Man, that sentence is hard to parse if you didn't know that.
See, now THAT I understand.I was gonna reply with "Has Hillary really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?'
Ahem.I somehow don't see that happening, to make an understatement.
So... I guess this will then lead to the uncomfortable question of just how far Bernie's supporters are willing to go to make him President.
Remember, remember, the 8th of November...So... I guess this will then lead to the uncomfortable question of just how far Bernie's supporters are willing to go to make him President.
There's going to be over three months between the convention and the election, and during that time the entire democratic party will be going, "We can't let trump win!" so I expect there will be many who now say they cannot or will not vote for Hillary but when the time comes they'll pull the lever.I'd be very surprised if that happened. Sanders supporters are talking a big game, but I think when its time to pull that lever, most will hold their nose and vote for Hillary.
A big part of the Sanders movement are independents who only registered to vote for Bernie, which is why they are so adamant about not "falling in line."There's going to be over three months between the convention and the election, and during that time the entire democratic party will be going, "We can't let trump win!" so I expect there will be many who now say they cannot or will not vote for Hillary but when the time comes they'll pull the lever.
Also, expecting the left to just hold their nose and vote for Clinton is like expecting the right to hold their nose and vote for Romney...or McCain.A big part of the Sanders movement are independents who only registered to vote for Bernie, which is why they are so adamant about not "falling in line."
I bet he'll day it again on the day he concedes.Gary Johnson: Not afraid to say "fuck" on national television.
Like I always say, if he even does well enough to have to be let into the debates, I'll call it a victory.I bet he'll day it again on the day he concedes.
He damn well knows what the watershed is.Gary Johnson: Not afraid to say "fuck" on national television.
Well that seems a bit extreme.I'll just go right out and say this. If you are a Trump supporter, I want nothing to do with you. I don't want you near me or my family. You are no friend of mine. You are not even an acquaintance. In short, go fuck yourself.
And assassinating an MP isn't? Their twitter feed is full of "she deserved it" and "she was a traitor" type posts. The Trump supporters aren't too far removed from that point of view. That's dangerous, and I don't want those types of dangerous people anywhere near anyone I care about.Well that seems a bit extreme.
And by this logic, Hillary supporters aren't too far removed from Che Guevara's point of view, and should be viewed with similar levels of wariness to what would be appropriate for violent, murderous revolutionaries?And assassinating an MP isn't? Their twitter feed is full of "she deserved it" and "she was a traitor" type posts. The Trump supporters aren't too far removed from that point of view. That's dangerous, and I don't want those types of dangerous people anywhere near anyone I care about.
Assassination is certainly extreme, but I'm pretty sure the person that did that wasn't a Trump supporter, what with, you know, being British. I just think you're painting in very broad strokes here, saying that anyone that would vote for Trump is someone that would want to assassinate people in cold blood. I don't exactly have any statistics for it, but I'm pretty confident that the majority of people that will vote for Trump probably aren't murderers.And assassinating an MP isn't? Their twitter feed is full of "she deserved it" and "she was a traitor" type posts. The Trump supporters aren't too far removed from that point of view. That's dangerous, and I don't want those types of dangerous people anywhere near anyone I care about.
Hillary supporters aren't attacking people at rallies. No. Only Trump gives you Brownshirt levels of political violence.And by this logic, Hillary supporters aren't too far removed from Che Guevara's point of view, and should be viewed with similar levels of wariness to what would be appropriate for violent, murderous revolutionaries?
Trump opposers definitely seem to not be shy about attacking people on the street.[DOUBLEPOST=1466110462,1466110439][/DOUBLEPOST]It's not the Trump supporters who are being violent.
I'm guessing you haven't been watching the news the last few weeks.Hillary supporters aren't attacking people at rallies. No. Only Trump gives you Brownshirt levels of political violence.