Dave
Staff member
Nope. But the chef to the stars was fucking hilarious.Didn't take it all the way to eleven, eh?
--Patrick
Nope. But the chef to the stars was fucking hilarious.Didn't take it all the way to eleven, eh?
--Patrick
It's still way better than Raise the Titanic, the other Dirk Pitt novel that was adapted into a movie.Sahara was bad
I admit liking the Dirk Pitt novels when I was a teenager. They seem so silly now. Never saw either movie, either.
They are really much better once you see them as examples of why genre books are mostly dead. He hits every note perfectly. It's too bad the score sucks.Clive Cussler used to be one of my favorite authors and now he's just...ugh. When he started writing himself into the books I stopped taking him seriously.
And here's the end of every chapter - Dirk Pitt is knocked unconscious in some terrible peril (usually under water). Beginning of the next chapter - Dirk Pitt miraculously rescued or luckily wakes up in the nick of time.
Honestly, of three movies in the Three Flavours Cornetto series - Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz, The World's End - I loved the hell out of the first three but found The World's End really disappointing in a lot of ways. Though I've only seen it once, so maybe repeat viewings would make me appreciate it more.Hot Fuzz
Very enjoyable police farce with elements of "city boy in a small town." Good action scenes and reference humor. I don't know why, but every time there's a Simon Pegg/Nick Frost movie, I'm always dubious about it, and I'm always pleasantly surprised.
I'd say World's End was probably the weakest of the 3 but it was still pretty good.Honestly, of three movies in the Three Flavours Cornetto series - Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz, The World's End - I loved the hell out of the first three but found The World's End really disappointing in a lot of ways. Though I've only seen it once, so maybe repeat viewings would make me appreciate it more.
Oh, definitely. It wasn't a bad movie by any means. But compared to the others, it was a let down.I'd say World's End was probably the weakest of the 3 but it was still pretty good.
I've heard one of its biggest problems is it doesn't have the same earnestness or charisma of the first one.Independence Day: Resurgence was not as fun as the first. Glad I got matinee pricing. I didn't expect greatness, but was at least hoping for it to keep the feel of the first.
That is definitely one issue with it. They attempt to have a "big speech" at a few points, but it never rings quite like that original "big speech" Bill Pullman gave in the first one.I've heard one of its biggest problems is it doesn't have the same earnestness or charisma of the first one.
But aren't those explosions awesome?Also, I never felt invested in any of the "new" cast. They didn't spend the time to make me give a shit.
It was also kind of lacking in explosions. I mean, they were there, but there was a lot of talking for the amount of character definition we didn't get.But aren't those explosions awesome?
--Patrick
Honestly, of three movies in the Three Flavours Cornetto series - Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz, The World's End - I loved the hell out of the first three but found The World's End really disappointing in a lot of ways. Though I've only seen it once, so maybe repeat viewings would make me appreciate it more.
Perhaps I can point you to an excellent video which will improve your point of view on World's End?I'd say World's End was probably the weakest of the 3 but it was still pretty good.
why. I also have to give it a point for using the Wilhelm Scream.
The Wilhelm Scream needs no reason.
The movie was so meh that the cinematic equivalent of a meme was one highlight of the film?
Thanks for reminding me of an interesting video I wanted to post in the Movie News thread.Yeah, pretty much.
I also just saw the Independence Day sequel. I understand why Hollywood wants to cram Chinese characters into every nook and cranny, but pandering to Chinese censors is still pandering.
Aw, that's too bad. I liked it a lot. Care to elaborate on that 'meh'?Finding Dory
Meh
No earthquake?I just watched Batman vs. Superman. I get what people said about it and their criticisms are completely justified...but I didn't think it was all that bad. Mine had that extra 30 minutes, though. I wonder what I saw that they didn't get in theaters and if that made a huge difference.
I can't even imagine that monstrosity being 30 minutes longer. It was already torture to sit through.I just watched Batman vs. Superman. I get what people said about it and their criticisms are completely justified...but I didn't think it was all that bad. Mine had that extra 30 minutes, though. I wonder what I saw that they didn't get in theaters and if that made a huge difference.
I've only seen the extra 30 minutes version, but think it needs about an hour cut from it.I can't even imagine that monstrosity being 30 minutes longer. It was already torture to sit through.
It may have been a bad mood or the fact that Finding Nemo was so brutally on point (having been a dad for only a year when it came out didn't help), but it somehow didn't hit as much. Maybe I'm being unfair. It was funny, but not as. The emotional stuff hit, but not the same way. Something about it just didn't gel with me for some reason. I think this is a prime example of a movie opinion being very much subjective. I'm pretty sure it was good movie, just not so much for me.Finding Dory
Meh
Apparently a lot of explanations and logic were cut out of the theatrical version. Not just whole scenes, but cutting 30-60 second snippets here and there that made chunks of the movie nonsensical and directionless without them. Whoever edited the thing went a bit trigger happy in the editing booth in their desperation to get it down to 2 hours and 20 minutes, essentially destroying flow and pacing for the sake of keeping all action bits, even pointless ones.I just watched Batman vs. Superman. I get what people said about it and their criticisms are completely justified...but I didn't think it was all that bad. Mine had that extra 30 minutes, though. I wonder what I saw that they didn't get in theaters and if that made a huge difference.
Apparently a lot of explanations and logic were cut out of the theatrical version. Not just whole scenes, but cutting 30-60 second snippets here and there that made chunks of the movie nonsensical and directionless without them. Whoever edited the thing went a bit trigger happy in the editing booth in their desperation to get it down to 2 hours and 20 minutes, essentially destroying flow and pacing for the sake of keeping all action bits, even pointless ones.
So good, bad, or meh, the main difference between the theatrical vs extended versions seems to be that the latter was coherent. And for a long sit of a movie, that can make a big difference.