a Trump vs Clinton United States Presidential Election in 2016

Who do you vote into the office of USA President?


  • Total voters
    48
Old guy on the bus is talking to the bus driver he's trapped about how the metro is crap because Obama kept all the money to himself and how Trump is going to fix it unlike all those money-grubbing sons of bitches.

Okay, first of all, Trump: not a money-grubbing son of a bitch? Really?

Two, no politician in D.C. gives two shits about the state of the metro. Maryland ones, Virginia ones, sometimes, but all these other states' reps, the president? Nope. If train-enthusiast Biden couldn't be arsed to care about the metro, no one in the White House can.
 
This election really feels like America is showing the world that anything they can do, America can do better.

But Boaty McBoatface and John Scott were just a bit of fun, no need to make your choice about the leader of the free world...
 
I don't see any source for the bolded claim in that article, though it makes the same claim itself. All it's sources say is that it's not about withheld emails, the podestra emails, or emails sent from Clinton. All of those things could be true and the information in the emails could still involve either Hillary, the Clinton Foundation, or the State Department. If nothing Clinton related is in the emails, why would the FBI be investigating it as part of the Clinton email investigation?
It's not being investigated as part of the Clinton email investigation. It's being investigated as part of the Anthony Weiner sexting investigation. Why is it tangentially related to Clinton? Because Anthony Weiner's soon to be ex-wife is Huma Abedin, Hillary's personal aide. So any emails between Weiner and his wife might be considered related to the Clinton emails because of that.
 
e-mail e-mail eeeeee-mail

FBI says Huma Abedin may possibly have made an oopsie. Although they haven't found it yet.
Abedin would use this procedure for printing documents when she received emails she believed Clinton needed to see and when the Secretary forwarded emails to her for printing. Abedin told the FBI she would often print these emails without reading them. Abedin printed a large number of emails this way, in part because, investigative records show, other staff members considered her Clinton’s “gatekeeper” and often sent Abedin electronic communications they wanted the Secretary to see.
This procedure for printing documents, the government official says, appears to be how the newly discovered emails ended up on the laptop shared by Abedin and her husband. It is unclear whether any of those documents were downloaded onto the laptop off of her personal email accounts or were saved on an external storage device, such as a flash drive, and then transferred to the shared computer. There is also evidence that the laptop was used to send emails from Abedin to Clinton; however, none of those emails are the ones being examined by the FBI. Moreover, unless she was told by Abedin in every instance, Clinton could not have known what device her aide was using to transmit electronic information to her.
If the FBI determines that any of the documents that ended up on the shared device were classified, Abedin could be deemed to have mishandled them. In order to prove that was a criminal offense, however, investigators would have to establish that Abedin had intended to disclose the contents of those classified documents, or that she knew she was mishandling that information.
Why Comey felt the need to make his own oopsie.
According to a letter Comey sent to the chairs of several Congressional committee on Friday, he learned of these new emails on Thursday, October 27.
His decision to immediately reveal this discovery was not a partisan act, although it was a horribly mishandled one. Arguably, he had to issue his letter because of previous statements he had made to Congress. In September, he testified that the bureau had completed its review of the evidence in the case and found no crimes had been committed. With the discovery of the information on the laptop shared by Weiner and Abedin, that sworn statement was no longer true, and there was new evidence that needed to be examined. As a result, Comey felt he was obligated to inform the committees as quickly as possible that his previous statement was now incorrect.
However, the letter he sent could well damage the reputation of the FBI as an apolitical organization for years to come. Given that Comey also testified that his agents would examine any new evidence that emerged, Democrats will undoubtedly argue that issuing a letter repeating that point was unnecessary.
 
whenever someone suggests the US will follow our much-stupider ex over the same cliff (brexit), I'm reminded that the USA actually has a non-white population capable of stopping old white men from ruining the entire economy. Whew. Diversity - it's actually good (TM)
 
whenever someone suggests the US will follow our much-stupider ex over the same cliff (brexit), I'm reminded that the USA actually has a non-white population capable of stopping old white men from ruining the entire economy. Whew. Diversity - it's actually good (TM)
London is as diverse as new York. The country is white and poor either way. But good to know the USA us the only "diverse" country out there.
 
It's not being investigated as part of the Clinton email investigation. It's being investigated as part of the Anthony Weiner sexting investigation. Why is it tangentially related to Clinton? Because Anthony Weiner's soon to be ex-wife is Huma Abedin, Hillary's personal aide. So any emails between Weiner and his wife might be considered related to the Clinton emails because of that.
Yes, the emails were discovered as part of the sexting investigation, but since being found, they are being examined as part of the Clinton email investigation. That's why Comey sent the letter, because he had testified before Congress that that investigation was complete, but now that has changed.
 

Dave

Staff member
whenever someone suggests the US will follow our much-stupider ex over the same cliff (brexit), I'm reminded that the USA actually has a non-white population capable of stopping old white men from ruining the entire economy. Whew. Diversity - it's actually good (TM)
The Trumpers are much more likely to vote.
 

Dave

Staff member
Stupid people are voting for Trump. There are some smart people voting for him as well, but if you are dumb or paranoid, chances are you're a Trumper.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Stupid people are voting for Trump. There are some smart people voting for him as well, but if you are dumb or paranoid, chances are you're a Trumper.
If ALL the stupid people were voting for Trump, I dare say the polls would look like a Trump landslide, because there are way more stupid people than smart. Thus, I think there are plenty of stupid people voting for Hillary.
 
If ALL the stupid people were voting for Trump, I dare say the polls would look like a Trump landslide, because there are way more stupid people than smart. Thus, I think there are plenty of stupid people voting for Hillary.
Not to mention you're voting for Johnson. :troll:
 
If ALL the stupid people were voting for Trump, I dare say the polls would look like a Trump landslide, because there are way more stupid people than smart. Thus, I think there are plenty of stupid people voting for Hillary.
I had this friend, years ago, who was a moron when it came to politics. He used to vote for all Democrats without checking their policies or positions because he believed they were good people. How did he know? Because they were Democrats. (Logic!)

He also voted yes automatically on every proposition/local measure because "if someone suggested it, it must be a good idea."

So yes, idiots all around.
 
More like the only sane option in a crazy world, no matter how smarmy leftists get about supporting their archmatriarch of infinite corruption :D
Gary Johnson isn't a sane option because he's an affable but ignorant joke candidate without enough support to make the debates. I mean, in 2012, you know how much of New Mexico he won? His home state, that he had been governor of?

3.55%. 27,787 votes. That was his best single result.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Gary Johnson isn't a sane option because he's an affable but ignorant joke candidate without enough support to make the debates. I mean, in 2012, you know how much of New Mexico he won? His home state, that he had been governor of?

3.55%. 27,787 votes. That was his best single result.
"A vote for him is wasted because nobody votes for him." Congratulations on perpetuating the 2 party system.
 
:D

Well yeah he made the mistake of thinking he would have a fair shake running as a Democratic. Like Hillary was going to let some popular upstart take away the nomination meant for her again. :hide:
 
:D

Well yeah he made the mistake of thinking he would have a fair shake running as a Democratic. Like Hillary was going to let some popular upstart take away the nomination meant for her again. :hide:
Laugh all you want, but she played the game better this time. Fool her once, shame on them, fool her twice...
 
Top