[Brazelton] Roe v. Wade

figmentPez

Staff member
Says the man whose wife was heavily involved in the Jan 6th insurrection which tried to use violent force to change the outcome of a free election.


Link

About half of the SCOTUS needs to be impeached, immediately. I don't care if there's no precedent, having court members involved in insurrection and committing perjury is not acceptable.
 
Does this fucker think we forgot Anita Hill and the bullshit of how he got his job? He should never have been seated in the first place.
 

figmentPez

Staff member
I absolutely hate the fucking bonkers takes that conservatives are pulling out right now to try to slander pro-choice:

Bad Arguments on Twitter 2022-05-09 222350.png


This is a strawman. Plain and simple. Maybe there's some idiot out there who actually believes that women who miscarry are delusional, but that's NOT the stance of the majority of pro-choice people, and it is NOT the logical conclusion of believing that an embryo is not a fully fledged human being with all rights and privileges thereof. Embryos don't have to have legal rights for a miscarriage to be an emotional event. You can grieve the lost of a potential future without denying the rights of other women to control their own lives.

I have no idea if this is a fake account spreading propaganda, or a real person who is severely lacking in logical reasoning skills, or someone who is just caught up in grief and is not thinking about the consequences of her words. Whatever the case, I really hate that there are going to be people who get sucked in by emotional arguments like this, and think we have to define a fertilized egg as a human being, just because some pregnancies are wanted.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
I absolutely hate the fucking bonkers takes that conservatives are pulling out right now to try to slander pro-choice:

View attachment 41435

This is a strawman. Plain and simple. Maybe there's some idiot out there who actually believes that women who miscarry are delusional, but that's NOT the stance of the majority of pro-choice people, and it is NOT the logical conclusion of believing that an embryo is not a fully fledged human being with all rights and privileges thereof. Embryos don't have to have legal rights for a miscarriage to be an emotional event. You can grieve the lost of a potential future without denying the rights of other women to control their own lives.

I have no idea if this is a fake account spreading propaganda, or a real person who is severely lacking in logical reasoning skills, or someone who is just caught up in grief and is not thinking about the consequences of her words. Whatever the case, I really hate that there are going to be people who get sucked in by emotional arguments like this, and think we have to define a fertilized egg as a human being, just because some pregnancies are wanted.
Remind that bot that, under the law the anti-abortion crowd wants, she'd be sent to prison for that miscarriage.
 

figmentPez

Staff member
Representative Lucy McBath asked congress, “After which failed pregnancy should I have been imprisoned? Would it have been after the first miscarriage, after doctors used what would be an illegal drug to abort the lost fetus? I ask because the same medicine used to treat my failed pregnancies is the same medicine states like Texas would make illegal. I ask because if Alabama makes abortion murder, does it make miscarriage manslaughter?”
 
Soon the only legal way to have an abortion will be when a cop beats a woman and causes her to lose it cause you know they aren't getting charged with murder under these rules in that case.
 
Soon the only legal way to have an abortion will be when a cop beats a woman and causes her to lose it cause you know they aren't getting charged with murder under these rules in that case.
The woman will be charged with resisting arrest by throwing her baby at him in an attempt to get away. You know, like a quokka.

--Patrick
 
Since we're throwing Separation of Church & State out the window, then it's time for churches to pay taxes. If they actually do charitable work rather than just fleecing elderly people out of money to pay for private jets, they can file for 501(3)(c) status and be treated like any other tax-exempt charitable organization (and be held accountable to the rules).
 
Since we're throwing Separation of Church & State out the window, then it's time for churches to pay taxes. If they actually do charitable work rather than just fleecing elderly people out of money to pay for private jets, they can file for 501(3)(c) status and be treated like any other tax-exempt charitable organization (and be held accountable to the rules).
I guarantee this Supreme Court would support taxing synagogues, temples, and mosques while continuing to give Christian churches a pass.

“Just like the founders intended.”
 
Top