Onlyfakes blocked the regular few terms, which then led to people trying to get around it - "youthful" instead of young, etc, so more got added to the block, including terms like student, schoolgirl, and loli. Even that wasn't enough, so they had to add cute, innocent, shy, and a whole litany of synonyms like that. In fact there's even a tooltip during the "generating..." screen that says that attempting to generate loli content will cause an instant ban. I have not put it to the test.Yeah, I've started to get weird blocks on prompts that don't even have the word child or kid in them...but MJ allows you to appeal, and so far, every one has gone through
I mean there’s a difference between trying to block pornographic content and trying to block loli (which is now clear that’s what that user was complaining about.Oh, the joys of living in a world controlled by the Land of the Prudes.
It's like Facebook still blocking anything that might even hint at a female nipple - breastfeeding, breast cancer awareness, statues, whatever.
So, the past couple of days I thought there was something wrong with my internet connection. While playing youtube on chrome on my second monitor, I'd notice that the youtube website seemed to be incredibly sluggish to react, and videos kept refusing to load quickly or would time out and only load in low quality.
Closing chrome and loading youtube in another browser, however, like Opera, suddenly made all of the problems go away. Now the site is super snappy, everything loads instantly into HD, google has to be doing something fucky between youtube and chrome.
The fucked up part is I actually pay for youtube red, or plus, or whatever the fuck it's called now.YouTube’s war against ad-blockers continues as it expands site slowdowns
Pay up or suffer lag: YouTube is expanding slowdowns on the site for users with ad blockers.indianexpress.com
Never pay the extortionists.The fucked up part is I actually pay for youtube red, or plus, or whatever the fuck it's called now.
I saw this happening at work and just assumed it was some kind of IT security thing that verified "suspicious" pages before letting them load because it happens on some websites but not others. I am starting to suspect it is something that happens to ANY page that incorporates ANY connection to Google's servers, which means that even sites that merely use Google Analytics (such as Halforums) are getting swept up in that same Adblock dragnet. If so, even more reason to divest reliance on Alphabet services.5 second slowdown built into it whenever anyone uses anything other than Chrome.
Before I solved my YouTube problem it was managing to really drive up my CPU usage and not only slow down my internet but slow down everything. All because adblock was installed in chrome.I'm on someone's family account for premium so I get the best of both worlds (not paying and no ads) but I had to change a fucking specific setting when browsing Youtube to get past the 5 second slowdown built into it whenever anyone uses anything other than Chrome.
Fuck them. Giving them money isn't enough?
Trying to divest myself from as much Alphabet as I can.
I also used to recommend Opera as an alternative back in the day, until they dumped their Presto engine for Chromium/Blink.as a former Opera stan from way back
"Gee, I sure wish my browser had a built-in taxi meter that would automatically send micropayments to the website owner without any further interaction from me" SAID NO ONE EVER."Web Monetization," an incubating community specification that would let websites automatically receive payments from online visitors, as opposed to advertisers, via a web browser and a designated payment service. "Web monetization is a web technology that enables website owners to receive micro payments from users as they interact with their content."
How to ruin Chromium's market share in one easy step.I considered posting this in the Enshittification thread, but it's probably more appropriate here:
Chromium devs plan to put micropayments in the browser
I'd buy that for a $0.00000001www.theregister.com
"Gee, I sure wish my browser had a built-in taxi meter that would automatically send micropayments to the website owner without any further interaction from me" SAID NO ONE EVER.
We can hope.How to ruin Chromium's market share in one easy step.