Update: Jirard's foundation suddenly donated 600k like the day this video dropped, which totally absolves him of all wrongdoing, and then put out an apology video effectively blaming his audience for misunderstanding his intentions, and threatening legal action for those who exposed him.Keeps getting worse.
Say what you will of James Somerton, but the smartest thing he did was to just disappear and not try to make any statements on the situation.Update: Jirard's foundation suddenly donated 600k like the day this video dropped, which totally absolves him of all wrongdoing, and then put out an apology video effectively blaming his audience for misunderstanding his intentions, and threatening legal action for those who exposed him.
That was a mistake.
Maybe he's just waiting for someone else to make the same statement so he can sue it for his video.Say what you will of James Somerton, but the smartest thing he did was to just disappear and not try to make any statements on the situation.
Not to defend the completionist, but if we're being completely fair, Karl Jobst -is- attacking him with what are -mostly- unsubstantiated claims. Some of the claims are true, most of it is speculation. Jobst isn't a journalist, he's a drama youtuber whose main goal is to get views. And I don't even say that as anything against him, I like his channel, but he's gross paparazzi at best. Jirard does have every right to seek legal action against unsubstantiated claims that could pass into libel and cause harm.Update: Jirard's foundation suddenly donated 600k like the day this video dropped, which totally absolves him of all wrongdoing, and then put out an apology video effectively blaming his audience for misunderstanding his intentions, and threatening legal action for those who exposed him.
That was a mistake.
Them Duke boys are at at againI know John Schneider was already an honorary member of this thread, but...
View attachment 46887
...yeesh. Hadda go and hit the nitro on this one, didja?
--Patrick,
You are correct, the proper term for stringing up a person is "hanged."Also, isn't the term technically "hanged," not "hung"?
I'm willing to bet Hunter was fully satisfied.You are correct, the proper term for stringing up a person is "hanged."
However, since nude pictures of Hunter have already been entered into evidence, would that mean Schneider's requirements they be "publicly hung" have already been halfway satisfied?
--Patrick
Found this from last year, too.Pat Sajak
Pat Sajak Accused of 'Posing With Nazis' After Photo With Rep. Greene
Sajak has hosted "Wheel of Fortune" for over 40 years and has in the past shared controversial conservative views.www.newsweek.com
The fact that he kept trying to pawn nfts on people long after that train had already derailed more or less predicted this.Snoop Dogg's got nothing but love and respect for Trump.
James Somerton the famous plagiarist confirmed alive . At least if you can believe posts on Reddit.Apparently his channel is still deleting comments on his videos so I’m guessing it’s a fake suicide attempt for attention.