Related to this, I learned she's a "vaccines cause autism" kind of person, too. Really disappointing.Letitia Wright has taken a lot of shit for her garbage views but you know what Marvel actress has skirted any backlash until now despite being openly shitty since the start of Covid?
Marvel actor Evangeline Lilly shares that she attended anti-vaccine mandate rally
The anti-vaccination mandate rally held Sunday made headlines because of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s comments comparing the policies to the Holocaust.www.nbcnews.com
I mean, it's right there in the title.I have a feeling this thread is going to bring me very little joy and a lot of sadness and disappointment.
It's the Diet Misanthropy Thread - now SFW!I have a feeling this thread is going to bring me very little joy and a lot of sadness and disappointment.
Man's got a kink no shame in that.I mean, he did win MVP this year. Losing to the Niners in the playoffs is just kind of his thing.
Yeah, but it's not really surprising.With the spectre of nuclear war rising again, Nena's "99 Luftballons" is back in the zeitgest in places I've surfed.
And thanks to that, TIL Nena's anti-vax.
Singer Nena’s concert cancelled after Covid-19 comments
The singer is attracting criticism after opposition to Germany’s pandemic restrictionswww.independent.co.uk
So, is the problem with him is that he thinks the conflict will only end if there is divine intervention (based on the assertion that Putin isn't going to back down and the Ukrainians will never give up)? Are we cancelling people for that now?Mickey Rourke
Just noting down for the record the degree and currency.He’s been nuts for a long time.
I often wonder why certain people don't get a lot of work and Fred Savage is one. Have to wonder what kind of douchbag he is.Here's one I hadn't heard of before...Fred Savage, who has apparently been removed from 3 shows now in his life following complains of misconduct.
Word is that he was (and maybe still is?) a racist asshole:I often wonder why certain people don't get a lot of work and Fred Savage is one. Have to wonder what kind of douchbag he is.
Being a huge fan of Boy Meets World, I hope the apple falls very far from the tree in his brother, Ben Savage.
*hangs head* Goddammit.Word is that he was (and maybe still is?) a racist asshole:
‘Boy Meets World’ star apologises for racist joke calling colleague “Aunt Jemima”
I mean, probably. Shining paragons we are not. See: Jackbox NightIf it wasn't for Keanu Reeves serving as a shining counterpoint, I might think that every single person in this world has a skeleton in their closet, some of them child skeletons.
The huge irony of this is I remember there explicitly being an episode of Boy Meets World where Fred Savage (a college professor) sexually harasses Topanga and the college kind of drags their feet about doing anything about it.I often wonder why certain people don't get a lot of work and Fred Savage is one. Have to wonder what kind of douchbag he is.
Being a huge fan of Boy Meets World, I hope the apple falls very far from the tree in his brother, Ben Savage.
Guess I'm just late to the party.I’m sorry did it really take this long?
I was gonna say, he's been racist a long time.Guess I'm just late to the party.
Also: Racism
Opinion | The depressing final act of Eric Clapton
Bigotry and ignorance, in the age of the internet, have a way of catching up with you. And Clapton’s racism and conspiracy theories can no longer be ignored.www.nbcnews.com
My mother is very meek, always looks for the good in people and seldom says an unkind word. But, she can be savagely quick and sarcastic. Once, I was reading an article that had Eric Clapton's line about "I used to be into drugs, now I'm into racism," and without missing a beat my mother said, "I guess that's why his band was called Cream."I was gonna say, he's been racist a long time.
That would be Ricardo Medina, aka Cole Evans from Wild Force and Dekar from Samurai. He's done 6 years, for voluntary manslaughter. He got out in 2020.He's an avid Trumper and shit too, big shock that he's a thieving piece of shit.
Red Rangers have a tough go at it, didn't one kill his room mate with a sword?
I wish we would stop saying these people are "Trumpers" at this point. Time to skip all the cult crap and get to the root of what they are- FASCISTS.He's an avid Trumper and shit too, big shock that he's a thieving piece of shit.
Red Rangers have a tough go at it, didn't one kill his room mate with a sword?
Hey now, Hitlerists.I wish we would stop saying these people are "Trumpers" at this point. Time to skip all the cult crap and get to the root of what they are- FASCISTS.
Too loaded. I want people to use a word that accurately describes these people. I'm tired of these guys constantly rebranding themselves and sugar coating their poison pill ideologies.Hey now, Hitlerists.
Hitler was a fascist.Hey now, Hitlerists.
Based on Miller's other completely insane actions and behavior, I'm more inclined to believe the 2nd.Ezra Miller has gone from "haha, he gets in bar fights" to: As Ezra Miller grooming allegations deepen, court ‘cannot locate or serve’ the actor
I have no idea what side to come down on in this.
On one hand: A restraining order against Miller accuses him of “psychologically manipulating, physically intimidating and endangering the safety and welfare of Tokata Iron Eyes". They (non-binary are 18 and Miller is 29, but they first met when 12 and 23, and allegations of abuse go back to at least when the alleged victim was 14.
Among the allegations are, "giving Tokata alcohol and drugs, such as marijuana and LSD, and flying Tokata to London, Vermont, New York, California and Hawaii", "tried to sleep in the same bed as the then-14-year-old Tokata and was prevented from doing so by a chaperone", using multiple social media accounts “to threaten and gaslight any victims and truth from coming out.”
On the other hand: Tokata has publicly denied that they are a victim, says they are thankful for Miller's support, and says their parent's actions are transphobic. So, while I'm inclined to be harsh on anyone who is abusing children, I also know that abusive parents know how to spin a story to make it sound like anyone helping their child is the real abuser.
This could be a trans-teen who is trying to escape bigoted parents through an adult in their lives who was supportive, or it could be a child who was groomed for years and is now lying to protect their abuser.
Either way, Miller just keeps stirring up drama, and seems to be really dumb about the way he does it.
I'm more inclined to believe Miller is the abuser, as well (and damn me for having that one sentence in the entire post flip the order of the two), but I don't think I can be certain without more knowledge.Based on Miller's other completely insane actions and behavior, I'm more inclined to believe the 2nd.
It's a complicated issue because:I completely agree with Mr. Atkinson, and interpreting "cancel culture" as only oppressed minorities daring to speak up is completely disingeneous. Some people on"Both sides" are trying to silence people on the other end of the political spectrum, and it being reduced to two sides IS a large part of the problem.
It's certainly more problematic when the powerful try to silence the oppressed, obviously. But - certainly online - there's also a movement on the left to silence anyone who dares question some aspects of a sometimes runaway faux-progressivism.
You're right, it's a older one. I only remembered because a more recent one came out.That article is also from early 2021.
And he makes it quite clear that he's grumpy that he isn't "allowed" to punch DOWN in that interview.You're right, it's a older one. I only remembered because a more recent one came out.
I'm with Gas on this one: whatever legitimate problems there are on the left, it doesn't excuse the fact that the right wing will use any excuse to dismiss criticism out of hand and THEY are the ones who want to line people up against the wall right now.
Weird Al is one of those celebrities that seems REALLY awesome and I would be significantly disappointed if he turns out to be a milkshake duck. Tom Hanks and Chris Evans are among that group, too.Bizarre shit from a guy whose comedy is as cutting edge as the side of a knife, I mean for fuck sakes he's currently in a show about a man and a bee.
This would be like Wierd Al complaining about not being able to say the n word.
I just feel like saying that I think this one is being taken out of context. Sean Bean has been acting for quite some time and Intimacy Coordinators are fairly a new concept. He's used to one thing and has been told "we do it this way now". The article doesn't show him being disrespectful in his responses. He just mentions that the coordinators tend to throw him off. When the interviewer mentions that the coordinators are there to protect the actors, Sean Bean's response is that "I suppose it depends on the actress". Yeah he doesn't really understand how important something like that is nowadays, but again, he's used to one way. If he were known for being an inappropriate co-star that would be one thing. In response to that interview Lena Hall only said nice things about her Snow Piercer costar. “Sean is an awesome actor and made me feel not only comfortable but also like I had a true acting partner in those bizarre scenes,”I don't know if Sean Bean has previously had his reputation tarnished, but he certainly deserves a big "fuck you" now.
All sorts of things are planned out and choreographed in films. Fight scenes, stunts, dance, special effects, etc. Why? Because actors should be kept safe. Intimacy Coordinators are doing the same kind of work stunt coordinators do, making sure that a potentially dangerous situation stays controlled, and looks impressive while protecting everyone involved.
Fuck you and your asshat opinion, Sean Bean. Take your remarks, print them out on card stock, fold them until they're all sharp corners, and then get intimate with the result, no IC present, because that would "spoil the spontaneity".
She also was very clear to note that she was NOT "up for anything", but Mr. Bean did describe her that way. It kinda shows the need for IC when the male star thinks anything is on the table, but the female star quietly disagrees. She's pretty clearly being tactful because she doesn't want toIn response to that interview Lena Hall only said nice things about her Snow Piercer costar. “Sean is an awesome actor and made me feel not only comfortable but also like I had a true acting partner in those bizarre scenes,”
This has been my take. I feel like his view is outdated but as long as he's going along with the new standards, even if begrudgingly, then it's basically a non issue. But people like to be mad so I just watch them be mad.I’m going to agree with @Shawn. This is NOT the same as sexual harassment or sexual assault. This is someone expressing an outdated opinion. We, as a society, should disagree and educate in situations like this. Not vilify.
Again that's pulling "do whatever he wants" from literally no where.I don't know, I think was most disappointed he was reading a Jordan Peterson book more then anything else.
Considering JP makes all his money stoking the fires of male grievance it kind of makes sense now that Sean Bean is being all starry eyed for when "men could be men" and do what they wanted regardless of how comfortable the woman feels in the situation.
Not exactly. Intimacy Coordinators are there to direct the action of a sex scene for everyones comfort in mind. Sean complains that doing it spoils the "spontaneous" intimacy of the scene, but what is "spontaneous"?Again that's pulling "do whatever he wants" from literally no where.
AKA, he wants to do whatever he feels like in the scene.performed or occurring as a result of a sudden inner impulse or inclination and without premeditation or external stimulus.
My assumption is that his use of the word “spontaneous” refers to spur of the moment decisions to make the scene seem more real. He’s an old school actor and he puts effort into all of his performances. Unless I’m wrong he’s not being outed as a creep on set by any actresses or actors, so I would imagine he has respectful conversations with his sex scene costars on what is or what is not OK. If he follows the rules and is respectful to the other actors and crew then I say let him have a conversation about how he prefers the old school ways.Not exactly. Intimacy Coordinators are there to direct the action of a sex scene for everyones comfort in mind. Sean complains that doing it spoils the "spontaneous" intimacy of the scene, but what is "spontaneous"?
AKA, he wants to do whatever he feels like in the scene.
Fun fact (okay, not really), but not every sexual assault / rape is the type where the woman is thrashing and screaming "No!" into the heavens. Most start out as a simple moment where the "spontaneous" urge of the male in the situation leads to something like groping or sex, at which point the female can go into shock or fear responses, which in turn, the male, now hot and heavy, considers to be consent for his actions.
This situation gets MORE complicated when it's not two people hanging out or dating, but instead two co-workers who have to play act intimacy and may not carry the same power dynamics, many will just suffer in silence to make sure they don't get fired, or blacklisted, . Sean Bean might think it's more spontaneous to just go in with the butt rub while imitating sex, but that does not mean his co-star is going to be happy about the fact Sean Bean grabbed her butt without warning her, because it "felt right" for him to do it.
In no way am I implying that Sean Bean wants to sexually harass people, it's his job to act and sometimes that means acting intimate, but unless he is asking way ahead of time to the actress "Would you mind if I gave your nipples a little pinch while we gyrate?" then that could be a problematic situation, and sure as hell isn't "spontaneous."
Then my question is, what makes it more real? What does he hope to change in the scene that the Intimacy Coordinator is preventing him from doing?My assumption is that his use of the word “spontaneous” refers to spur of the moment decisions to make the scene seem more real. He’s an old school actor and he puts effort into all of his performances. Unless I’m wrong he’s not being outed as a creep on set by any actresses or actors, so I would imagine he has respectful conversations with his sex scene costars on what is or what is not OK. If he follows the rules and is respectful to the other actors and crew then I say let him have a conversation about how he prefers the old school ways.
What mythology is he talking about? Is he speaking about Greek Mythology? Norse? Christian? Does he know that in almost every mythology, one of the biggest constants was that women were just conquests for men to enjoy? The dude played Zeus in Percy Jackson, a masculine god that rapes dozens of women in actual mythology often times in the guise of someone else, or a fucking animal. There are stories of daughters getting raped by their own fathers (Harpalyce), mothers raped by their sons (Halie). I know many like to gloss over the story of Persephone these days, making it all romantic in video games like Hades, but people forget that Persephone was Zeus' daughter, Hades WAS HER UNCLE, and he raped her and made her his queen in the Underworld with the consent of Zeus, who again, WAS HER FATHER."I think you've got to be careful we do not lose sight of what a man is. Look at the old heroes in mythology, history - there's a great respect for a man's adventures and strengths."
I can only really respond by saying that you may be over analyzing the situation.Then my question is, what makes it more real? What does he hope to change in the scene that the Intimacy Coordinator is preventing him from doing?
Again, spontaneous means, like you said, spur of the moment, NO PREMEDITATION. That means no preparation. If you are setting boundaries and rules, aka, what the Intimacy Coordinator does, then you are not being spontaneous, you are following the script just like you would any other scene. The placement of your hands, the way you kiss, all that is planned by the Intimacy Coordinator with the approval of both the actor and the actress before they put on their skin suits and socks and get into the bed. What we are rightfully pointing out, is that by complaining about how the Intimacy Coordinator "spoils the spontaneity" and shouldn't be needed, it means he wants more freedom to feel out how to make the scene better, and that does not always mean, "I should ask if Lena is okay if I add a little tongue this time, because it might make things look better on camera."
And you are perfectly right, it could be that Sean simply asks right as the scene is about to start, "What are you okay with me doing?" and then him and the actress work it out, but again, you have to understand power dynamics. If the actress is on a lower tier then Sean, she may offer to let him do more then she actually wants, because she will fear that if she prevents him from doing what he thinks will make the scene feel best, she will be replaced, or blacklisted, or the chemistry of other scenes will be ruined, or so many other things that will make the woman give up just anything short of actual sex. The Intimacy Coordinator is SUPPOSED to be a third party that makes sure no one is giving into specific things they don't want to do, and the fact Sean is complaining about them even existing means he wants to be the one to make that choice, to make the decision.
Can you not understand how that can be a bad look?
This is, again, following the fact that he also wrote about how he is reading a Jordan Peterson book and how men shouldn't have to be apologists for being masculine or male. To better hone my point I want to copy and talk about one specific passage.
What mythology is he talking about? Is he speaking about Greek Mythology? Norse? Christian? Does he know that in almost every mythology, one of the biggest constants was that women were just conquests for men to enjoy? The dude played Zeus in Peter Jackson, a masculine god that rapes dozens of women in actual mythology often times in the guise of someone else, or a fucking animal. There are stories of daughters getting raped by their own fathers (Harpalyce), mothers raped by their sons (Halie). I know many like to gloss over the story of Persephone these days, making it all romantic in video games like Hades, but people forget that Persephone was Zeus' daughter, Hades WAS HER UNCLE, and he raped her and made her his queen in the Underworld with the consent of Zeus, who again, WAS HER FATHER.
This is why the whole thing feels so tone deaf from Sean. He is opining over a time when "men were men" and could be legendary heroes, without thinking A) who wrote those stories, and B) How those men treated women back in those stories. The fact he is also complaining how he can't be spontaneous in sex scenes is just icing on a very problematic cake.
If that is the way you want to go, I can just say you may be under analyzing the situation. See how that works?I’m just going to say that you may be over analyzing the situation. My
I can only really respond by saying that you may be over analyzing the situation.
I think it's a bit of a stretch to say that Sean Bean has an old-fashioned view of masculinity because he misses how old stories celebrated it (referencing mythology) to "Sean Bean supports rape because he references mythology that has rape in it"I know many like to gloss over the story of Persephone these days, making it all romantic in video games like Hades, but people forget that Persephone was Zeus' daughter, Hades WAS HER UNCLE, and he raped her and made her his queen in the Underworld with the consent of Zeus, who again, WAS HER FATHER.
Never said Sean Bean supports rape. Can you point out where I said as such?I think it's a bit of a stretch to say that Sean Bean has an old-fashioned view of masculinity because he misses how old stories celebrated it (referencing mythology) to "Sean Bean supports rape because he references mythology that has rape in it"
Nope, I can't. You didn't directly say that.Never said Sean Bean support rape. Can you point out where I said as such?
My point is that he is opining for a time men were men without understanding what that means. It's the same root where many men see the 1950s as a glorious period when women stayed in the kitchen while the men go earn a living (and maybe screwed a secretary or two on the side). Women couldn't even have their own credit cards till the 1980s.Nope, I can't. You didn't directly say that. But it seemed to be the direction you were heading when you were kind of angrily connecting his statements about mythology and how there's rape in there.
The old school ways were for the leading man to impose his will and if the actress spoke out about stuff she wasn’t comfortable with she’s labeled “difficult” and her career was largely over.My assumption is that his use of the word “spontaneous” refers to spur of the moment decisions to make the scene seem more real. He’s an old school actor and he puts effort into all of his performances. Unless I’m wrong he’s not being outed as a creep on set by any actresses or actors, so I would imagine he has respectful conversations with his sex scene costars on what is or what is not OK. If he follows the rules and is respectful to the other actors and crew then I say let him have a conversation about how he prefers the old school ways.
Look, if you're talking to me, that clearly means you've consented to having my thumb up your ass. That's just plain common sense.So… “implied violence” is the exact same thing as “another person would resist if I physically or sexually assaulted them?”
Am I understanding that correctly?
I have at least three of your thumbs there.Look, if you're talking to me, that clearly means you've consented to having my thumb up your ass. That's just plain common sense.
It means that he believes that and interaction with a male could conceivably end in a fight, and he seems to try to give an example of breaching someone's personal space and bodily privacy to provoke said fight. And while this is obviously dumb, it does give a fascinating insight into Scott's state of mind. He is constantly on edge and afraid of interaction, and he then projects that onto everyoneSo… “implied violence” is the exact same thing as “another person would resist if I physically or sexually assaulted them?”
Am I understanding that correctly?
This would actually work better in Dutch, where "inch" and "thumb" are the same word.I have at least three of your thumbs there.
Many languages, really. Considering where the measurement originated. Heck, even "digital."This would actually work better in Dutch, where "inch" and "thumb" are the same word.
WHEELPat Sajak
Pat Sajak Accused of 'Posing With Nazis' After Photo With Rep. Greene
Sajak has hosted "Wheel of Fortune" for over 40 years and has in the past shared controversial conservative views.www.newsweek.com
The Try Guys are now the Tri Guys (Ned got the boot for cheating on his wife with a subordinate).
I'm gonna be honest, though they're fully in their right to cut ties with him and I think they did the right thing, this is the one milkshake duck I've seen where I really don't care. Yes, cheating on your partner is bad, but it's pretty mundane when compared to everyone else's awfulness.
—Patrick
That's why him being removed from the company is absolutely justifiedWell, he was a part owner of the company and she was his employee, which is pretty gross.
I’m Jewish and like a lot of Kanye’s music. One of those weeks.My wife absolutely loves her music. This is really disappointing.
I have no idea what that is.She's the "Paper Planes" rapper.
--Patrick
Oh, that song.It’s a song you’ve 100% heard and don’t know the name of. Like, it’s a classic example of a song that’s like that for everyone.
Looked it up, and yeah. I know the Diplo mix better than the original.It’s a song you’ve 100% heard and don’t know the name of. Like, it’s a classic example of a song that’s like that for everyone.
If you ever saw the movie Pineapple Express or it's trailers, "Paper Planes" was featured heavily. I think it was what made her famous, to my knowledge. Oh, and she performed at a Super Bowl Halftime show with Madonna and Nikki Minaj. Otherwise... yeah, you're not missing anything that I can recall.I have no idea what that is.
It's okay. You don't have to explain it.
Hey me too. Though Kanye "fans" are used to this by nowI’m Jewish and like a lot of Kanye’s music. One of those weeks.
I didn't recognize her name either, and when I looked it up I was just, "Oh. Her."It's okay. You don't have to explain it.
Hey me too. Though Kanye "fans" are used to this by now
Yeah, unfortunately as he got older, he got a lot more problematic.Didn't know Gallagher was a piece of shit till now.
Oh I knew, it's just... who cares about Gallagher?Didn't know Gallagher was a piece of shit till now.
It's only relevant because he just died. That's all.Oh I knew, it's just... who cares about Gallagher?
Twitter chose to show me this, because it thinks I retweet stuff like it.
Twitter chose to show me this, because it thinks I retweet stuff like it.
He's an idiot. First, because most people don't drive Teslas. Second, if you've already bought a Tesla, are you just going to get rid of your car because Twitter is being mismanaged? This tweet makes no sense.
I thought he provided some story, plot, or lore, too? I was under the impression a lot of his lines were adlibbed, too.Roiland's been mostly just voice talent for the last few years on the show.
You can just replace voice actors and no one can tell the diddly-ifference."Roiland's exit is not expected to impact Rick and Morty" Uhhhhh how you figure?
Yeah, tell that to the whole Futurama/John DiMaggio kerfluffle that happened recentlyYou can just replace voice actors and no one can tell the diddly-ifference.
Hey, John DiMaggio is a bona fide talent.Yeah, tell that to the whole Futurama/John DiMaggio kerfluffle that happened recently
Sure, but he still lost the kerfuffle.Hey, John DiMaggio is a bona fide talent.
—Patrick
So they knew and still did nothing? Or the WRITERS knew and didn't say anything? Or they told the brass and weren't believed?This guy works at Squanch
The Simpsons is and has been having something of a revival in the past few years, as a new generation of writers that grew up watching the show have come on and started writing for it. It's not the same kind of show anymore (how could it be? Everything transgressive about it in the 90's is mainstream now) but the writing is noticeably improved and it's become absolutely fierce in it's criticisms.Aw jeez, Rick, maybe it's, y'know, time to just let the series end gracefully before it jumps the shark? Nobody likes the Simpsons anymore.
Yeah Morty, buUUUHHRRRt the Simpsons is still making SHIT TONS of money, and until that changes, RICK AND MORTY FOREVER FOR A HUNDRED YEARS
My guess is WB split the difference. "Ok, we investigated and found you've got a valid gripe about Justin being a sex pest. But here's the thing - Rick and Morty is a FUCKING gold mine and we're not going to do ANYTHING to derail that. So here's the compromise. You SHUT THE FUCK UP about the whole thing, and Roiland does all his work from home, you never have to see him again, you keep your job, everybody makes money, win-win. GOT IT?"So they knew and still did nothing? Or the WRITERS knew and didn't say anything? Or they told the brass and weren't believed?
Likely the first one. People are selfish, and they had what is a hit show in which Justin voices both title characters. They basically threw him out quietly but kept him on the voices because they didn't want to end the gravy train, hoping the actual accusations wouldn't become public. This is probably why Justin went off and made his gaming company.So they knew and still did nothing? Or the WRITERS knew and didn't say anything? Or they told the brass and weren't believed?
He literally just googled "Pfizer lawsuit" and posted the first link that came up.Thought for a second that his followup tweet explained that it wasn't about the vaccine, but the thing he posted came from 2009, so who knows?
He linked to a settlement about unlawful/unethical marketing of opioids. Which is something that should be criticized, and I doubt that it's the only skeleton in Pfizer's closet. They're probably price fixing on any number of life-saving medications, and engaging in all sorts of immoral, unethical, and outright illegal business practices.Thought for a second that his followup tweet explained that it wasn't about the vaccine, but the thing he posted came from 2009, so who knows?
they're also absolute money machines who would like to see nothing better than have everyone take a pill to wake up, a pill to fall asleep, a pill to be focussed at work, a pill to relax and unwind, a pill to feel happy and a pill to get through the day.
I mean, you can't sell drugs to dead people, right?capitalistic goals aligned with our survival goals, for once.
It's also worth noting that most of the basic research for this was done with public funds, mostly by a Polish immigrant that started her work back in Poland and was basically the laughing stock of her department for years because no one thought mRNA research was worth anything. Then Pfizer used the publicly available knowledge to make it's vaccine.Yeah, the optics aren't great, but I do think it's important to remember that big Pharma is still largely a malevolent global force, even if it did produce the COVID vaccine. That was just a nice window where their capitalistic goals aligned with our survival goals, for once.
You also can't sell drugs to healthy / cured people. That is why this shit can be so infurating. There is no profit motive for actual health, only bare minimum survival.I mean, you can't sell drugs to dead people, right?
As someone who works very closely with the pharmaceutical industry, that's just not true. Thousands of people, including scientists, researchers, doctors, marketing people, and management are involved with these companies, and nobody is at the whims of a handful of moustache twirling grifters that are only in it for the profits.You also can't sell drugs to healthy / cured people. That is why this shit can be so infurating. There is no profit motive for actual health, only bare minimum survival.
Nobody's saying the companies are altruistic, there are miles of space between " purposely keeping people sick to make money" and "curing everyone out of the goodness of their hearts". Publicizing the medical industry would do wonders, as most of the costs are due to the sheer number of middle men taking their share between the patient and the medicine or treatment, and it's purposefully obfuscated to maximize profits, which sucks, but companies are definitely not holding back cures and cure research to cash in.Hey, I hope you right man, but considering what drugs cost in this country compared to anywhere else in the world, I don't see a lot of evidence that drug companies around here are only doing it out of the goodness of their hearts. I know many of the doctors and scientists that develop these drugs do just want to help people, but they are not the ones spending over half the budget just on advertising the latest drug that they sell for hundreds on the dollar.
God dammit. His stuff is how I got into Minecraft.Davidangel64 of "X's Adventures in Minecraft" is a JK Rowling apologist who thinks she speaks "common sense" about transgender issues.
His commentary in his videos has also been growing kinda misogynstic and MRA leaning.
This... actually doesn't come as a complete shock to me. I enjoyed watching his original X's Adventures and the occasional Starcraft commentary back in the day, but I remember there being a couple times he'd say something and, while I don't remember it being anything really bad, it kind left a blip on the radar, you know what I mean?His commentary in his videos has also been growing kinda misogynstic and MRA leaning.
Same. Or anyone from Worst Premade Ever, but they seem to be pretty safe (and generally wear their politics openly)The only game player/streamer I would be upset with to learn they are a POS is Josh from Let's Game it Out.
About damn time.Looks like the other shoe finally dropped.‘Dilbert’ Cartoon Dropped From Many News Outlets Over Creator Scott Adams’ Racial Remarks
Controversial remarks by '"'Dilbert'"' creator Scott Adams has seen many news outlets dropping the cartoon.deadline.com
--Patrick
Enough to force a bunch more outlets who were still running the strip to stop holding their nose and do something.How many shoes is that now?
He's right, he lost 3 careers to racism...his own racism.Watch out for that last sentence, it's a doozy.
View attachment 44020
Well I guess we can start giving all her roles to Gwendolyn Christie, then.Tilda Swinton refuses to follow Covid-19 protocols on film sets (MSN)
I view this as a winWell I guess we can start giving all her roles to Gwendolyn Christie, then.
Story is still developing. Gonna suck if it's true, guy is a super talented actor, but it'll probably be a few days before we know anything past speculation.WELP
Jonathan Majors arrested on assault charge in New York
The actor Jonathan Majors was arrested Saturday in New York on charges of strangulation, assault and harassment after a domestic dispute.apnews.com
Apparently people who have worked with him before say this is a pattern for him.His lawyer is claiming that they have the altercation on video, and it shows that the woman is lying. They also claim to have two witnesses swearing the same, and supposedly the woman has recanted.
But that’s his lawyer, so who knows? I certainly hope this is not true, but we’ll see.
I wouldn't trust We Got This Covered as a source. They're extremely right-wing, often make up stories, and have positively covered Comicsgate many times. They're not reliable.Apparently people who have worked with him before say this is a pattern for him.
There are multiple other sites reporting the same story. And I have little trouble believing that reports of abusive behavior were ignored by Hollywood.I wouldn't trust We Got This Covered as a source. They're extremely right-wing, often make up stories, and have positively covered Comicsgate many times. They're not reliable.
It wouldn't surprise me, either. I'm simply pointing out that WGTC is absolutely not a reliable source, nor has it ever been.There are multiple other sites reporting the same story. And I have little trouble believing that reports of abusive behavior were ignored by Hollywood.
After all they're moving forward with the Flash.
Well that is not a good lookHoly fuck. Holy fucking shit. Majors' lawyer shared this with TMZ as though it were evidence of exoneration..........
View attachment 44333
!!!
WHAT?
Devil's advocate time: That entire text could also be interpreted as manipulative on her part.Holy fuck. Holy fucking shit. Majors' lawyer shared this with TMZ as though it were evidence of exoneration..........
View attachment 44333
!!!
WHAT?
Non devil's advocate. She's a woman trying not to get murdered by soothing the man that has already strangled her.Devil's advocate time: That entire text could also be interpreted as manipulative on her part.
After my arrest my ex sent me text after text in the vein of "I'm so sorry. I didn't mean for this to happen. I love you. I know you did it because you love me. Ignore the restraining order and come home."
I mean she's basically listing off everything she's claiming he did and trying to manipulate him at the same time. Meanwhile he is doing everything he should absolutely be doing in this situation: Keeping things short and cut things off completely from her.
Absolutely could be. She absolutely could be a woman stuck in a co-dependent and abusive relationship and there absolutely needs to be an investigation into these claims.Non devil's advocate. She's a woman trying not to get murdered by soothing the man that has already strangled her.
I would also like to see the video. That could shed a lot of light on this.HIS lawyer put those texts out there into the world not hers, not she herself.
There's also video, I notice that hasn't been released, like they're trying to soften the blow of the video with the texts first. The video must be an incredible look if they thought the texts were better.
I've seen this kind of shit personally dozens of times through my life.
Really would have been smarter to have had that opinion before you played devils advAbsolutely could be. She absolutely could be a woman stuck in a co-dependent and abusive relationship and there absolutely needs to be an investigation into these claims.
Based on what his lawyers have released. They clearly believe that this is exculpatory which hopefully you can admit it isn’t.But we've got a few people posting above that this text is somehow very strong proof that he abused her based on what she wrote alone.
The situation is about a man being accused of domestic violence against a woman. Why should we as a country be beyond stating the facts of the case?He doesn't even respond to her.
People are focusing on how SHE is claiming HE abused her. Even you made it very clear that the situation is about a WOMAN not being murdered by a MAN, and not "a person not wanting to be murdered by someone else". It's this tendency to focus on the sexes involved in the case that concerns me. It is a social norm to assume that the woman in a situation is the victim without even being presented with all of the evidence.
I don't know the statistics, but I could absolutely believe that that the majority of domestic violence cases is still men abusing women. I absolutely can believe that if true.
But is that an excuse to assume that's the situation for every case? We are a country that should be beyond that.
The signs of a real convictionI've done my ranting and I'm acknowledging I'm a broken record. I may acknowledge if someone makes a good point (be it counter from my own or not) from now on but I'm not going to defend my opinion on this subject anymore.
As you are someone with direct experience with this kind of situation (even with such a small sample size), losing that viewpoint would be a loss for the rest of us.I'm not going to defend my opinion on this subject anymore.
I never said it was exculpatory. But it's not damning for him either. The woman states that she's not blaming him for anything. She says he didn't strangler her. She mentions the injuries but doesn't say they were caused by him, just that the cops "knew they had a fight" which could be referring to a verbal altercation only. She mentions it was her fault for trying to grab his phone. Also, police are required by law to make an arrest in the case of a domestic violence case where injuries are present, regardless of the explanation of those injuries.Based on what his lawyers have released. They clearly believe that this is exculpatory which hopefully you can admit it isn’t.
Also unless some really shitty assholes suddenly didn’t have complete shit takes no there wasn’t.
If you're stating facts just to provoke stereotypes then it's a misuse of those facts, especially if they are not relevant in the case. "I swear I was bit by the dog. It was a Pitbull. I rest my case."The situation is about a man being accused of domestic violence against a woman. Why should we as a country be beyond stating the facts of the case?
Not sure what you mean by that. like a sign that I'm "not showing real conviction" or that I believe Majors is guilty because I don't want to keep stating the same things over and over again?The signs of a real conviction
I actually don’t believe that a person can honestly claim that he didn’t hurt her from those texts. Not unless you flat out believe that she’s lying without proof.I never said it was exculpatory. But it's not damning for him either. The woman states that she's not blaming him for anything. She says he didn't strangler her. She mentions the injuries but doesn't say they were caused by him, just that the cops "knew they had a fight" which could be referring to a verbal altercation only. She mentions it was her fault for trying to grab his phone.
I think you could make arguments on both sides of this just from that. 1) He didn't hurt her and she's admitting that. 2). She's in a co-dependent relationship, he really did hurt her, and she's trying to protect him.
But if you've made a decision this early which it is then you've failed the system.
My biggest take away from this is he doesn't respond (at least not a response that we have seen yet). Guilty or not, that was the smartest thing he could do in this situation.
Except saying that he’s a famous man who has a reported history of shit like this who has been arrested for an attack on a woman is all facts that are relavent to the case.If you're stating facts just to provoke stereotypes then it's a misuse of those facts. "I swear I was bit by the dog. It was a Pitbull. I rest my case."
I’m calling you a coward for refusing to back up your own argument.Not sure what you mean by that. like a sign that I'm "not showing real conviction" or that I believe Majors is guilty because I don't want to keep stating the same things over and over again?
Either way it feels like trying to bait/troll me.
You're getting personal with this now. This is one reason why I would like to not keep stating the same thing over again. At this point we are at two separate viewpoints and maybe we are both just too stubborn to change our minds on them. So just going back and forth just wastes both of our time.I’m calling you a coward for refusing to back up your own argument.
My brother in Christ not for a second has this not been personal to you.You're getting personal with this now.
Have you not argued on the internet before? That’s all it ever is.This is one reason why I would like to not keep stating the same thing over again. At this point we are at two separate viewpoints and maybe we are both just too stubborn to change our minds on them. So just going back and forth just wastes both of our time.
I don’t believe you’ve been judging this fairly. You got all up in arms because I used man and woman. You claimed that multiple posters were saying how the texts proved that Majors abused her when the worst was somebody saying that releasing the texts was a bad look. Hell you even claimed that you could read the texts as proof that he didn’t hurt her.My stance is "Judge every situation fairly, regardless of who is involved, and don't allow opinions to ruin careers without a proper verdict in place". That's all it has ever been.
Somebody trying to stop you?I am an abuse victim who lost big because I reacted to her abuse and was targeted by a sexist judicial system. I feel have earned my right to state a case for those who may find themselves in the same scenario.
Put down those spoons.Don't make me do something ironic.
Carmack is the kind of weird nerd I could easily see falling into thatUuuuUUUuuHHGgghhghh.
John Carmack. definitely not a name I enjoy adding to this thread.
BasedCon is basically an alt-right con.
He was the guy at ID software responsible for every single tech breakthrough they ever made. Doom, and the modern FPS genre, owes everything to John Carmack.I have no idea who Carmack is, but Basedcon is just the Republican National Convention from the sound of iit.
John Carmack made Doom (alongside John Romero and others). He was the magic code gremlin that was able to figure out how to make first person shooters work and a pretty revolutionary figure in video games. I don't want to take away his accomplishments, his methods of bypassing computational shortcomings were very impressive.I have no idea who Carmack is, but Basedcon is just the Republican National Convention from the sound of iit.
When people tell you who they are, believe them.I guessed the name of the person he was talking about before he said it, but the disappointment was still immeasurable.
Clearly he was using the knife to stop her from trying to break free of the strangling... duh.“…to strangle his wife at knifepoint.”
I’m sorry, which is it?
—Patrick
Yeah this is very much a case of less "oh no, not that guy" & more "of course that guy". There were a couple of then nameless (1 still nameless, 1 later revealed to be newsreader Huw Edwards) allegations in the UK that most people assumed at the time to be Russell Brand.So that Channel 4 Dispatches doc on Russel Brand is an extremely hard, both figuratively and literally if you live outside the UK, watch. They called it In Plain Sight for a reason. He was actively telling everyone what he was doing n joke form for years.
Also his recent slide into right-wing grifter makes sense if he knew this was coming (and he did). Which side is going to support a manipulative serial sex abuser more?
Same with Jimmy Savile. He also told everyone in joke form.They called it In Plain Sight for a reason. He was actively telling everyone what he was doing in joke form for years.
I'm sad to report that Kari Byron, formerly of the Mythbusters, is now a corporate oil shill.
That like to dislike ratio is... oof.
Where are you seeing the dislikes?I'm sad to report that Kari Byron, formerly of the Mythbusters, is now a corporate oil shill.
That like to dislike ratio is... oof.
Where are you seeing the dislikes?
Gas already posted it, but if you don't want to install an extension, the video is sitting at 1k likes and 20k dislikes. But it's a good thing youtube removed visible dislikes to stop trolling and not to appease corporate interests like these.Where are you seeing the dislikes?
I've followed Jirard a long time, and from what I can tell, it's a case of him not knowing how to run a charity, and giving it to his brother and business partner in hopes he will take care of it, and nothing happening. While they haven't donated any of the money they've collected over the past decade, they also haven't spent it, it's just been sitting in an account with hopes that someone, somewhere, will eventually get around to taking care of it.It seems like this youtuber is running a charity scam, and it's been going on for 10 years, and the more we look into it the worse it gets:
I keep hoping it's a case of super incompetence. But the longer they stay silent and do nothing the worse it really looks for them.New video goes deeper.
Even shadier.
I'd be more inclined to believe this if not forI've followed Jirard a long time, and from what I can tell, it's a case of him not knowing how to run a charity, and giving it to his brother and business partner in hopes he will take care of it, and nothing happening. While they haven't donated any of the money they've collected over the past decade, they also haven't spent it, it's just been sitting in an account with hopes that someone, somewhere, will eventually get around to taking care of it.
So yeah, it's pretty fucking bad, but it's also not exactly a scam. They haven't profited off of it, but they have lied about it, seemingly in hopes that they'd soon get around to making that lie a truth, and then never getting around to it.
According to the videos, his brother runs the actual charity, and his father set up the golf thing I believeIs this just Jirard, or are there other people involved in handling the money? Does he have an accountant? A business manager? Anyone?
Because if it's just him I could see all this being the result of depression, burnout, and desperately trying to keep churning out videos and maintaining a good public face while drowning in mental health problems. It's not an acceptable excuse, but it's easy to loose track of anything that's not demanding your attention when you're struggling.
If he's got an accountant / financial advisor / business manager then it probably more clearly points towards intentional fraud, but I'm not a lawyer.
Update: Jirard's foundation suddenly donated 600k like the day this video dropped, which totally absolves him of all wrongdoing, and then put out an apology video effectively blaming his audience for misunderstanding his intentions, and threatening legal action for those who exposed him.Keeps getting worse.
Say what you will of James Somerton, but the smartest thing he did was to just disappear and not try to make any statements on the situation.Update: Jirard's foundation suddenly donated 600k like the day this video dropped, which totally absolves him of all wrongdoing, and then put out an apology video effectively blaming his audience for misunderstanding his intentions, and threatening legal action for those who exposed him.
That was a mistake.
Maybe he's just waiting for someone else to make the same statement so he can sue it for his video.Say what you will of James Somerton, but the smartest thing he did was to just disappear and not try to make any statements on the situation.
Not to defend the completionist, but if we're being completely fair, Karl Jobst -is- attacking him with what are -mostly- unsubstantiated claims. Some of the claims are true, most of it is speculation. Jobst isn't a journalist, he's a drama youtuber whose main goal is to get views. And I don't even say that as anything against him, I like his channel, but he's gross paparazzi at best. Jirard does have every right to seek legal action against unsubstantiated claims that could pass into libel and cause harm.Update: Jirard's foundation suddenly donated 600k like the day this video dropped, which totally absolves him of all wrongdoing, and then put out an apology video effectively blaming his audience for misunderstanding his intentions, and threatening legal action for those who exposed him.
That was a mistake.
Them Duke boys are at at againI know John Schneider was already an honorary member of this thread, but...
View attachment 46887
...yeesh. Hadda go and hit the nitro on this one, didja?
--Patrick,
You are correct, the proper term for stringing up a person is "hanged."Also, isn't the term technically "hanged," not "hung"?
I'm willing to bet Hunter was fully satisfied.You are correct, the proper term for stringing up a person is "hanged."
However, since nude pictures of Hunter have already been entered into evidence, would that mean Schneider's requirements they be "publicly hung" have already been halfway satisfied?
--Patrick
Found this from last year, too.Pat Sajak
Pat Sajak Accused of 'Posing With Nazis' After Photo With Rep. Greene
Sajak has hosted "Wheel of Fortune" for over 40 years and has in the past shared controversial conservative views.www.newsweek.com
The fact that he kept trying to pawn nfts on people long after that train had already derailed more or less predicted this.Snoop Dogg's got nothing but love and respect for Trump.
James Somerton the famous plagiarist confirmed alive . At least if you can believe posts on Reddit.Apparently his channel is still deleting comments on his videos so I’m guessing it’s a fake suicide attempt for attention.
He was in prison for a bit because of the fraud he did. I don't imagine that helped.The best response I saw was, "He was really the 'White Power Ranger' the whole time".
And that's a much kinder photo of him than the original article I saw. It was more recent, and I was wondering who the heck this guys was. Time hasn't been kind.
That's a defense mechanism, no doubt.You know, even as someone who never really connected with Harry Potter, it still makes me sad to see her reacting to the possibility that people don't read/don't like her work by saying "oh well, got your money!"
Rowling really doesn't like being called a Holocaust denier:Yesterday JK got a stamp of approval from Varg Vikernes, the murderer neo-nazi arsonist black metal guy. You know, the coolest. That's the kind of thing that should make a reasonable person go, oh, maybe I should reflect. She's rich and terf-brained, so that will not happen.
View attachment 47572
But she's just going fullblown nazi.
This is very much one of the conservative thought issues where they don't believe they are like the Nazis/Facists/Whatever because they don't literally call themselves that. It's a larger part of their general literacy issues, in that they don't understand nuance, themes, or subtlety in media or in speech. Part of this is just ignorance and part of it is just the willful dismissal of responsibility (i.e. they feel their actions are always justified, even when monstrous).I really wonder how much of the books she actually wrote and how much was done by her editor. Or were we suppose to root for Drako and Voldemort?
Unless they show up full of nazi symbols at any protest, then they're weirdly on the right side of the good people on both sides...Nazis are left wing, not right wing. Because the name “Socialist” is in their official title. - The Trump guys I work with
Yeah, it wasn't even that long ago.
So... Some 28-year-old sports guy known for being a conservative jackass spouted some conservative jackassery?
Nor did I. And the definition is someone you liked & thought was cool until they said or did something.Idk. I didn’t know he was like that before that speech.
James Somerton the famous plagiarist confirmed alive . At least if you can believe posts on Reddit.
I know it's "old news" now, but this video was both enlightening and entertaining.
--Patrick
I couldn't read the watermark on mobile. Probably not real then.You guys don't think something called "@TheSportsMemery" would just go on the internet and *lie* do you?
Agreed. This would be like deeming Chevy Chase a milkshake duck.I don't know if Dreyfuss would be considered a milkshake duck because he's long been known to be an asshole. It's rare you hear good news about him. He was a known asshole even back during Jaws.
His description of the video would suggest otherwise: hereLook, I don't know what they talked about. All I've seen is this image, but I already know Michael Ian Black belongs here.
View attachment 48676
That looks complicated as hell. I think women need to be believed. I think sexual assault needs to be pretty broadly defined. I think even accepting those two things, this feels like ex-lovers airing grievances about things that happened but that might not legally constitute sexual assault. Boundaries may have been crossed in the moment. Gaiman may have aggressive sexual proclivity with his partners who don't enjoy that. He may creepily engage in sex with women much younger than him. He doesn't look great. I'm not sure if it qualifies as full milkshake duck?Neil Gaiman accused of sexual assault
*sigh* Goddammit.
Exclusive: Neil Gaiman accused of sexual assault - Tortoise
Author denies allegations by two women who had been in consensual relationships with him.www.tortoisemedia.com
And it's been established that neither woman knew each other. One was only found after the investigation after the first complaint.Scarlett, 23, alleges that Gaiman sexually assaulted her within hours of their first meeting in February 2022 in a bath at his New Zealand residence, where she worked as a nanny to his child.
Consent can happen between boss and employee (she is not alleging coercion) and they had many weeks of sexual relationship after that first encounter, indicating a real consensual relationship, not just a one off assault.Nah, he was one woman's boss. What he did was vry bad.
And it's been established that neither woman knew each other. One was only found after the investigation after the first complaint.
The guy who made Mighty Magiswords on Cartoon Network was arrested for CP.
This one is personal for me. I've loved this guy's work for over half my life. I had his artwork printed out and taped to my wall. His goofy indie comedy songs about sheep, friendship, evil zombie turkeys and anime superhero pizza girls were as frequently played on my iPod and on the same pedestal as Weird Al.
I guess that means it's the real deal and not questional fan art.The crimes he is accused of do not apply to drawings, figurines, statues, or films rated by the Motion Picture Association.
Which is ironic because he apparently made a bing stink last year getting another artist blacklisted by doxing and outing their private rule 34 fan art account.I guess that means it's the real deal and not questional fan art.
He just doesn't believe in that fake stuff, and thinks everyone should go bio only...Which is ironic because he apparently made a bing stink last year getting another artist blacklisted by doxing and outing their private rule 34 fan art account.
Black took offense to his Tenacious D partner, Kyle Glass, making a joke about the Trump assassination attempt. He ended the tour they were on. It's possible the two might be splitting up, too.Does anyone know why my social media is suddenly treating Jack Black like he's a Milkshake Duck?
Crude humour including City Hall, a(n admittedly very tongue in cheek) song about political violence.Yeah, I was tempted to put that here. Jack's actions were out of line and he should have known what to expect from his LONG TIME, MULTI-DECADE COLLABORATOR that's he done crude humor with.
MAGA Begins Hunting People Who Made Trump Assassination JokesWhile I think Black's reaction was extreme, and probably too much, on some level, I can see him being worried he's going to get John Lennon'd when he got back to the states if he didn't make it clear he was against shootings.
On the one hand, I believe victims first and always hesitate to immediately assume the accused is innocent.Just to update, a 5th woman has come forward to accuse Neil Gaiman. It's not looking good. Hate this.
Neil Gaiman accused of sexual assault by fifth woman
A man, alleged to be Gaiman, has been recorded allegedly offering $60,000 (£45,400) to a woman.www.thebookseller.com
21% can't resist trolling pollsters.21%. TWENTY-ONE PERCENT?!?
There is clearly some educational/parenting failures there.
I really want to believe that, but ...*gestures to everything*21% can't resist trolling pollsters.
Well, his last act was his best.The ones he chose to act on, though...ehhhhh not so great.
Hitler was a vegetarian. I could easily see many Zoomers think, "Y'know what, vegetarianism counts as a good idea."Guys, I'm sorry to break this to you. Hopefully the blow is softened coming from me.
Adolf Hitler is a milkshake duck.
I know, I know. He seemed like such a good guy, too.
View attachment 49641
This is really what I was thinking, too. There is some nuance to the question, but I doubt that was what was being asked.Sadly I don't think any of those are the good ideas any of those zoomers are thinking about.
That’s hurtful. Especially considering that Trump would defund NASA in heartbeat. He might as well give his endorsement to a Flat-EartherI guess I shouldn't be surprised, but... damn it.
For me, for the future of our Nation, to meet enormous challenges, and for the proven policy accomplishments above, I believe the nation is best served by voting for Donald J. Trump, -- Buzz Aldrin
(Yahoo)
He punched him for calling him a coward, not for being a conspiracy nut. Unfortunately, much more in line with MAGA values.I miss the Buzz Aldrin that punches out conspiracy assholes.
I wish I could say this is surprising, but I recall Stallone has had...questionable political opinions in the past. I can't think of any specifics, just that I vaguely recall being disappointed by things he said.Perhaps not so much of a MD since, well, everyone knows he's got terrible views, but Sylvester Stallone attended a Trump gala today and praised him as "the second George Washington", a "mythical figure" and "the greatest leader of our time".