Constitutional limitations apply to all levels and branches of government.[/QUOTE]It seems you missed something important.Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
No law has been made here. The media dicks around with the government in most countries. And in pretty much every one of those countries, the government dicks right back. It's when laws are passed in the midst of all of the dicking, that we start crossing lines, as confirmed by your constitution, apparently.Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
You're right, no law has been passed here, and therefore there has not been a clear First Amendment violation. My point is that they're starting to skirt the line, with the push to have Fox "alienated" and pressuring the other networks to maybe toss them from the White House Press Pool.Alright. Maybe I bolded too much. Allow me to try again.
No law has been made here. The media dicks around with the government in most countries. And in pretty much every one of those countries, the government dicks right back. It's when laws are passed in the midst of all of the dicking, that we start crossing lines, as confirmed by your constitution, apparently.Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
I see. I don't think this could really lead to a constitutional crisis at all, which is why I don't take this as seriously, I guess, but I can see what you're saying now.You're right, no law has been passed here, and therefore there has not been a clear First Amendment violation. My point is that they're starting to skirt the line, with the push to have Fox "alienated" and pressuring the other networks to maybe toss them from the White House Press Pool.
Putting aside hypothetical constitutional crises for a second, it's just plain unseemly for the White House to be getting involved in a public "war" with Fox. It makes the WH sound like a bunch of thin-skinned amateurs, and probably isn't the best thing to be doing when we're supposed to be dealing with more important matters (Afghanistan, anyone? Almost two months since McChrystal's troop increase request.) Krisken's link showed that some elements in the Bush White House wanted to publicly call out MSNBC, but the idea was shelved due to it being "unpresidential."
I really think this is going to backfire on Obama in a big way. Even liberal commentators are questioning the wisdom of going after Fox like this, and Fox's ratings are continuing to go up.
I think everyone can agree on this point.In the end people need to watch a hell of a lot less 24 hour news networks anyway.
I think everyone can agree on this point.[/QUOTE]In the end people need to watch a hell of a lot less 24 hour news networks anyway.
I think everyone can agree on this point.[/QUOTE]In the end people need to watch a hell of a lot less 24 hour news networks anyway.
I think everyone can agree on this point.[/QUOTE]In the end people need to watch a hell of a lot less 24 hour news networks anyway.
I think everyone can agree on this point.[/QUOTE]In the end people need to watch a hell of a lot less 24 hour news networks anyway.
Er, why? The entire western world is mixed-system, with varying degress of socialism. In fact, off the top of my head I can't think of any pure capitalist societies out there; maybe some in Africa but that's probably more anarchist than capitalist.Considering I'm a pragmatic socialist in favor of a mixed-system, I still find the woman to be a bit of an idiot.
Now to see if I'm going to be called a traitor or an irredeemable fool for believing in socialism >_>
I hope these aren't Rutgers students! Because if they were, the irony would be thick - demonstrating against socialism at a public university...Eh, there's a tea party group at Rutgers that's been picketing the main campus with "Socialism is Treason!" and "Disband the Democratic Party!" signs as of late when I go to speak to the admins there. I get accosted every time for my views haha.
I dunno, but they ARE insanely annoying. I made a crack about the inevitability of empires to fall and a very angry, very big man got in my face and screamed that I was a traitor and should be deported to cuba with my commie buddies.I hope these aren't Rutgers students! Because if they were, the irony would be thick - demonstrating against socialism at a public university...
I dunno, but they ARE insanely annoying. I made a crack about the inevitability of empires to fall and a very angry, very big man got in my face and screamed that I was a traitor and should be deported to cuba with my commie buddies.[/QUOTE]I hope these aren't Rutgers students! Because if they were, the irony would be thick - demonstrating against socialism at a public university...
Is it?Dang.. I'm glad Canadian politics are a little less cut-throat.
Is it?[/QUOTE]Dang.. I'm glad Canadian politics are a little less cut-throat.
I wonder who would win in a fight between Jean Cretien and Dick Cheney ...Dude also took down a burglar in his own house. At 62, he was still kicking ass
I wonder who would win in a fight between Jean Cretien and Dick Cheney ...[/QUOTE]Dude also took down a burglar in his own house. At 62, he was still kicking ass
I wonder who would win in a fight between Jean Cretien and Dick Cheney ...[/QUOTE]Dude also took down a burglar in his own house. At 62, he was still kicking ass
I wonder who would win in a fight between Jean Cretien and Dick Cheney ...[/QUOTE]Dude also took down a burglar in his own house. At 62, he was still kicking ass