How to make a Whedon show.
Step one: Attractive girl with superpowers. Bonus points for making her stupid. Center story around this girl
Step two: Write a bunch of dialogue that sounds vaguely like the way people really talk, esp. regarding pop culture. Make it rambling and geek-like, yet strangely foreign, so that the net result is like watching a play of geeks talking.
Step three: hit trope-filled cast of five or so. Include bad-ass nerd and the bumbling normal who occasionally gets a moment to shine
Step four: Fill with unfleshed, poorly explained antagonists.
etc. etc.
That doesn't really work for Firefly.[/QUOTE]
What? Firefly was one of the main ones I was using to write that.
1. River (she may not be the protagonist, but the story floats around her)
2. Most of what Mal and Wash say
3. Wash is the bumbling normal, the doc is the bad-ass nerd. You've got your standard Lancer in the black chick, etc.
4. We never learn much about any of the baddies. The movie explains a little more, but not much.
---------- Post added at 07:53 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:49 PM ----------
For the record, I liked Firefly. But it was just about the only Whedon show I liked. I thought Buffy and Angel were just plain stupid. I thought he did a much better job with the Buffy movie, and the funny thing is that I seem to recall reading his complaints about how he hated it because he was so constrained or something like that.