There was a screen shot of the Boycott group on Steam, posted up on Kotaku today. It showed nearly everyone on the list playing the gameNo mods/dedicated servers=no buy.
There was a screen shot of the Boycott group on Steam, posted up on Kotaku today. It showed nearly everyone on the list playing the game [/QUOTE]No mods/dedicated servers=no buy.
There was a screen shot of the Boycott group on Steam, posted up on Kotaku today. It showed nearly everyone on the list playing the game [/quote]No mods/dedicated servers=no buy.
You know, while mods might not be supported, it's not like they can do anything to stop modders who actually want to put in the effort... so whenever a dev says "no mods" i want to punch them in the face...No mods/dedicated servers=no buy.
My bet is on "already."Also, who wants to take bets on how long it takes for them to blame piracy for PC sales being lower...
I think it's because people can see the missed potential. The game COULD have had dedicated servers and all that other stuff that makes PC multiplayer gaming more fun, but it didn't. Lots of other games have this function, MW2 does not. Missed potential.I really don't understand how the whole "This game wasn't made the exact way I wanted it to be" mentality means the game is any less fun.
Can someone explain?
(And OH MY GOD I WANT TO PLAY SO BAD)
If they cared they would have never done it in the first place...And yet, for all their bitching, the game went on to be a huge seller. I do not think the publisher really cares much at this point.
If they cared they would have never done it in the first place...And yet, for all their bitching, the game went on to be a huge seller. I do not think the publisher really cares much at this point.
Ugh, the more I hear about blizzard lauding their MMO subscriptions, the more it sounds like Bnet is going to be a pay service.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30501433/vp/33844922#33844922
Surprisingly, MSNBC has done the best review of Modern Warfare 2 I've seen.
8 out of 10 sounds about right. The single player campaign is pretty good but has plotholes the size of planets and the airport mission is very well done but when taken with the rest of the game that feels like a cheap low-intelligence popcorn flick it feels like a poorly done move to generate publicity.
The multiplayer is solid, but could have been improved in several ways, including things that were already in Modern Warfare 1.
Overall, not the strongest entry in the CoD franchise, and certainly not \"10/10 GOTY ALL YEARS\" that everyone is making it out to be. It's really just another somewhat above average FPS that gets popped out at the rate of 1-2 a year.
Also: http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=227204
To summarize the article: Activision is paying attention to all of the cries from people who want things in the game that have been in all the previous COD games and are major FPS mainstays. So they're calling them new innovations and saying that players should pay extra for them.
Guess what, thats where most (most, not all though) of the money is to be made from gaming nowadays. and publishers know that and will cater to it. Sad to say, but it is true (there are notable exceptions, but in the overall, it is true)
black friday I'm sure some games will go on sale.I don't play on the console, just the PC. And if the game is that good people will either pay the extra $10 or wait for the price to drop.
Yup. And people are learning how to make mods (for some reason I can't get mine to work properly due to coding library issues. It keep saying it is not there, but I can see the libraries, but others have no problem ) the mods will be awesome cause in the past I have encounter some really talented people pretty much "rework" the game with mods.I thought MW:2 singleplayer was worth it alone + the spec ops.
And yes Chibi...at this point in time I couldn't care less of DA:O had multiplayer or not. It kicks too much ass.