COD: Modern Warfare 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ok, I gave it two days but now I want to know from the players: Is it any good?

Is it worth picking up? Is it a good addition to the previous game or is it the equivalent of The Matrix Reloaded?
 
Yeah I just finished playing throughg it yesterday. Rollercoaster ride from start to finish. Excellent plot twists and good action.
 
J

JONJONAUG

No mods/dedicated servers=no buy.
There was a screen shot of the Boycott group on Steam, posted up on Kotaku today. It showed nearly everyone on the list playing the game :D[/QUOTE]

That picture is a load of poppycock, Steam displays whoever is in-game at the top of their lists. All that proved is that 30 or so people out of however many people are in the group bought it.

That list showed the people who were in-game at the moment, not everyone in the entire group.

Valve can actually track how many people in the group have actually bought the game, but I don't think they'll be releasing that information.
 
C

Cuyval Dar

No mods/dedicated servers=no buy.
There was a screen shot of the Boycott group on Steam, posted up on Kotaku today. It showed nearly everyone on the list playing the game :D[/quote]

That picture is a load of poppycock, Steam displays whoever is in-game at the top of their lists. All that proved is that 30 or so people out of however many people are in the group bought it.

That list showed the people who were in-game at the moment, not everyone in the entire group.

Valve can actually track how many people in the group have actually bought the game, but I don't think they'll be releasing that information.[/quote]
[STRIKE]Plus, it WOULD be kinda dickish to not even see how the game is (You know, besides firing up COD 4 & 5 and playing a multiplayer map by yourself, with no mods).
I probably will :arg: it, play it once, and delete it, just so I can say that I tried it.[/STRIKE]
See following post.
 
No mods/dedicated servers=no buy.
You know, while mods might not be supported, it's not like they can do anything to stop modders who actually want to put in the effort... so whenever a dev says "no mods" i want to punch them in the face...
 
Also, who wants to take bets on how long it takes for them to blame piracy for PC sales being lower...
 
T

TotalFusionOne

I really don't understand how the whole "This game wasn't made the exact way I wanted it to be" mentality means the game is any less fun.

Can someone explain?

(And OH MY GOD I WANT TO PLAY SO BAD)
 
J

Joe Johnson

I just bought it for console. The multiplayer is pretty awesome.
I do both PC and console games, but generally I don't end up using everything that a PC version of a game would offer, anyway. I can see how a PC gamer would be upset by the way they released this version - however, it's still a really fun game in it's own right.
 
I really don't understand how the whole "This game wasn't made the exact way I wanted it to be" mentality means the game is any less fun.

Can someone explain?

(And OH MY GOD I WANT TO PLAY SO BAD)
I think it's because people can see the missed potential. The game COULD have had dedicated servers and all that other stuff that makes PC multiplayer gaming more fun, but it didn't. Lots of other games have this function, MW2 does not. Missed potential.

Sort of like when you hear a joke, and the punchline is all right, quite funny, but you can think of an even better one. Suddenly it's harder to laugh at the original joke.
 

Shannow

Staff member
And yet, for all their bitching, the game went on to be a huge seller. I do not think the publisher really cares much at this point.
 
J

Joe Johnson

Right, a record breaker in sales. I guess the boycott didn't work.
 
Yeah, for all my bellyaching about the lack of LAN support on Starcraft 2, I'll be buying the hell out of that game when it's released. Even if they start charging for Battlenet, I'll still buy it but not play multiplayer.
 
And yet, for all their bitching, the game went on to be a huge seller. I do not think the publisher really cares much at this point.
If they cared they would have never done it in the first place...

But of course the game sold well, console gamers never had dedicated servers in the first place...
 
J

JONJONAUG

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30501433/vp/33844922#33844922

Surprisingly, MSNBC has done the best review of Modern Warfare 2 I've seen.

8 out of 10 sounds about right. The single player campaign is pretty good but has plotholes the size of planets and the airport mission is very well done but when taken with the rest of the game that feels like a cheap low-intelligence popcorn flick it feels like a poorly done move to generate publicity.

The multiplayer is solid, but could have been improved in several ways, including things that were already in Modern Warfare 1.

Overall, not the strongest entry in the CoD franchise, and certainly not "10/10 GOTY ALL YEARS" that everyone is making it out to be. It's really just another somewhat above average FPS that gets popped out at the rate of 1-2 a year.

Also: http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=227204

To summarize the article: Activision is paying attention to all of the cries from people who want things in the game that have been in all the previous COD games and are major FPS mainstays. So they're calling them new innovations and saying that players should pay extra for them.
 

Shannow

Staff member
And yet, for all their bitching, the game went on to be a huge seller. I do not think the publisher really cares much at this point.
If they cared they would have never done it in the first place...

But of course the game sold well, console gamers never had dedicated servers in the first place...[/QUOTE]


Guess what, thats where most (most, not all though) of the money is to be made from gaming nowadays. and publishers know that and will cater to it. Sad to say, but it is true (there are notable exceptions, but in the overall, it is true)
 
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30501433/vp/33844922#33844922

Surprisingly, MSNBC has done the best review of Modern Warfare 2 I've seen.

8 out of 10 sounds about right. The single player campaign is pretty good but has plotholes the size of planets and the airport mission is very well done but when taken with the rest of the game that feels like a cheap low-intelligence popcorn flick it feels like a poorly done move to generate publicity.

The multiplayer is solid, but could have been improved in several ways, including things that were already in Modern Warfare 1.

Overall, not the strongest entry in the CoD franchise, and certainly not \"10/10 GOTY ALL YEARS\" that everyone is making it out to be. It's really just another somewhat above average FPS that gets popped out at the rate of 1-2 a year.

Also: http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=227204

To summarize the article: Activision is paying attention to all of the cries from people who want things in the game that have been in all the previous COD games and are major FPS mainstays. So they're calling them new innovations and saying that players should pay extra for them.
Ugh, the more I hear about blizzard lauding their MMO subscriptions, the more it sounds like Bnet is going to be a pay service.
 
Guess what, thats where most (most, not all though) of the money is to be made from gaming nowadays. and publishers know that and will cater to it. Sad to say, but it is true (there are notable exceptions, but in the overall, it is true)

It's because you're all playing WoW you bastards...
 

Dave

Staff member
I don't play on the console, just the PC. And if the game is that good people will either pay the extra $10 or wait for the price to drop.
 
C

Chibibar

I don't play on the console, just the PC. And if the game is that good people will either pay the extra $10 or wait for the price to drop.
black friday :) I'm sure some games will go on sale.

Also that is what people say about Dragon Age : Origin not having Multiplayer = sucks..... well I'm only 15 hours in (gameplay wise) and LOVING IT
 
I thought MW:2 singleplayer was worth it alone + the spec ops.

And yes Chibi...at this point in time I couldn't care less of DA:O had multiplayer or not. It kicks too much ass.
 
C

Chibibar

I thought MW:2 singleplayer was worth it alone + the spec ops.

And yes Chibi...at this point in time I couldn't care less of DA:O had multiplayer or not. It kicks too much ass.
Yup. And people are learning how to make mods (for some reason I can't get mine to work properly due to coding library issues. It keep saying it is not there, but I can see the libraries, but others have no problem :( ) the mods will be awesome cause in the past I have encounter some really talented people pretty much "rework" the game with mods.

Bioware said the toolset pretty much allow users to practically "change the game" via script and lots of creative ideas. I can see new adventures and even characters for this. Woo!
 
I've decided I'm going to stop rushing to make PC purchases. It seems like if you just wait a few months you can get them for 20 bucks on steam.
 
I usually buy shooters for the multiplayer and especially the ability to hang on a couple of servers, getting to know the people there and have a blast with the zillion mods that were always available.

In all honesty, MW2 is a step down from MW so I'll stick with playing the superior game rather then it's newer and heavily stripped down successor. Seems to be more like a console port then a game designed for PC.

I hear good things about the single player though.

edit: Saw a nice little picture.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top