It makes him one of the most-successful of all-time, sure. Can't argue that.He should have 2 movies in the top 25 by time Avatar leaves the theaters, makes him one of the best directors of all time, next to Spielberg and Lucas.
This. Consider how much DVD sales take in. It's insane, often much more than the theatrical run (might not be the case for Avatar though).It also doesn't take into account the fact that pre-vcr the only way to watch a movie was at the theater, maybe we should include rentals and purchases of the movie too. Even once the VCR became mainstream the wait time for it to be released was huge, I think it was about a year. There will never be a good measurement of sales.
I know, but every time I doubt a musician's talent, some one drops in with record sales numbers. So I am just returning the favor now.yes point on the successful, not BEST
I know, but every time I doubt a musician's talent, some one drops in with record sales numbers. So I am just returning the favor now.[/QUOTE]yes point on the successful, not BEST
This. Consider how much DVD sales take in. It's insane, often much more than the theatrical run (might not be the case for Avatar though).[/QUOTE]It also doesn't take into account the fact that pre-vcr the only way to watch a movie was at the theater, maybe we should include rentals and purchases of the movie too. Even once the VCR became mainstream the wait time for it to be released was huge, I think it was about a year. There will never be a good measurement of sales.
that is pretty interesting. I thought China was going to ban it since it could "incite illicit political behavior"Well now it's officially movie of the century: China renames 'Avatar' mountain in honour of film
But earlier this month, China pulled 2D versions of the film from cinemas, saying they were not doing well commercially.
Critics said the move was to make way for domestic films - especially the state-backed biopic of the philosopher Confucius - and because the plot too closely mirrored forced land evictions in the country.
that is pretty interesting. I thought China was going to ban it since it could "incite illicit political behavior"[/QUOTE]Well now it's officially movie of the century: China renames 'Avatar' mountain in honour of film
How is taking it out of some theaters remotely the same as banning?Well they apparently banned the 2D version:
But earlier this month, China pulled 2D versions of the film from cinemas, saying they were not doing well commercially.
Critics said the move was to make way for domestic films - especially the state-backed biopic of the philosopher Confucius - and because the plot too closely mirrored forced land evictions in the country.
Still not seeing anything remotely fitting the definition of "banned".Banning a version... one that didn't need any special theatre either...
Yes, knowing the definition of words is akin to communism. Well played.Well you'd fit right in the CC of China i guess.
http://www.thrfeed.com/2010/01/avatar-ticket-sales-.html
Avatar is actually only the 26th most popular movie
http://movies.yahoo.com/feature/forbes-avatar-box-office-king.html
I liked this article. Especially because it acknowledges that with inflation adjustment, Gone with the Wind is still the highest grossing movie of all time.
Lots of 'em watched it twice?Still hard to figure that 202,044,600 tickets were sold to roughly 132,000,000 people.
"Gone With the Wind" was re-released in 1947, 1954 and 1961. In 1967 it was shown in 70 mm.
Yes, knowing the definition of words is akin to communism. Well played. [/QUOTE]Well you'd fit right in the CC of China i guess.
Where were the cheap thrills? In the last year I've seen half a dozen 3d movies, and except for Monsters Vs. Aliens, I can't think of any of them that turned it into a gimmick. I think it's a fantastic way to show movies, and a natural evolution of the format. Most of us can see in stereo, and appreciate the spacial awareness that comes along with that. Following from that, if we can do 3d, why wouldn't we do 3d? Previously the limiting factors were technology or cost, but now that those are both being surmounted ... again, I ask why not?You know, I have one more reason to hate Avatar: everything is going to be in fucking 3-D now. Harry Potter, Clash of the Titans, fucking CALIGULA: http://www.avclub.com/articles/caligula-director-to-bring-audiences-38ddd-in-3d,37651/.
I really don't want a ton of cheap fucking thrills coming at me with every fucking movie. Just like I didn't want every goddamn Wii game to have some bullshit waggle.
I have to say that I want to see this film. Especially considering that very little of what Confucius would have to say to the current government of China would be kind ...Critics said the move was to make way for domestic films - especially the state-backed biopic of the philosopher Confucius - and because the plot too closely mirrored forced land evictions in the country.
I'm guessing you would have been one of the holdouts for stereo. Lots of 70's music with stereo gimmicks, but are you willing to go back to mono radio?You know, I have one more reason to hate Avatar: everything is going to be in fucking 3-D now. Harry Potter, Clash of the Titans, fucking CALIGULA: http://www.avclub.com/articles/caligula-director-to-bring-audiences-38ddd-in-3d,37651/.
I really don't want a ton of cheap fucking thrills coming at me with every fucking movie. Just like I didn't want every goddamn Wii game to have some bullshit waggle.