Also, unicorns have been spotted in the country.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8676678.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8676678.stm
Tony Stark was able to build this in a cave! With a box of scraps!North Korea can't even make a missile that flies straight. I seriously doubt they have Fusion.
Tony Stark was able to build this in a cave! With a box of scraps![/QUOTE]North Korea can't even make a missile that flies straight. I seriously doubt they have Fusion.
The theories are all there (to my VERY LIMITED) knowledge of this stuff. It is the application that we (the people in general) haven't discover it yet.
It would be cool if they did discover it.
Meh.Also, unicorns have been spotted in the country.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8676678.stm
http://www.bit-tech.net/news/hardware/2007/03/28/homemade_fusion_reactor/1A 17-year-old high school senior in the state of Michigan has developed a homemade nuclear fusion reactor in his basement. No joke - he's even shown the "star in a jar" byproduct to prove it.
I'm actually pretty sure that if it was for real the other countries invading is the first thing we'd be hearing about...I hope Kim Jong realizes that if his claims were true that the U.S. and other countries would most likely invade and take their technology by force if negotiations failed for it.
I'm actually pretty sure that if it was for real the other countries invading is the first thing we'd be hearing about...[/QUOTE]I hope Kim Jong realizes that if his claims were true that the U.S. and other countries would most likely invade and take their technology by force if negotiations failed for it.
I'm actually pretty sure that if it was for real the other countries invading is the first thing we'd be hearing about...[/QUOTE]I hope Kim Jong realizes that if his claims were true that the U.S. and other countries would most likely invade and take their technology by force if negotiations failed for it.
Yeah, but when they're dead, you really miss em...My brother had been out of high school for about 4 years (dropped out) and my parents told him he could drive MY car (which I paid for and paid insurance on) to a job interview. On the way to school my brother decided that I wasn't driving fast enough (the speed limit at the time was 55 all over) and that I was doing the speed limit so he'd be late. He proceeded to rip my rearview mirror off the windshield, snap it in half and then throw it out the window. Then he thought it would be a good idea to backhand the driver in the face.
I stopped the car and threw the keys on top of a building. When he started to come around the car I got back in, started it with the spare set I always carried around and left him there.
*I* got in trouble for making him miss his interview.
Big brothers suck FAR worse than little brothers.
YES!...Henry Dean from Stephen King's Black Tower series.
Finally! Eight F*'n posts before SOMEONE picks up on the 17 year old! Come on! That's a huge deal right there!Maybe the DPRK has succeeded in copying that 17 year-old's experiment.
Finally! Eight F*'n posts before SOMEONE picks up on the 17 year old! Come on! That's a huge deal right there!Maybe the DPRK has succeeded in copying that 17 year-old's experiment.
Finally! Eight F*'n posts before SOMEONE picks up on the 17 year old! Come on! That's a huge deal right there!Maybe the DPRK has succeeded in copying that 17 year-old's experiment.
Ah.. to me, a "success" in Nuclear fusion would be creating AND containing.Because the problem with his design is still the same as with the larger designs Korea and everywhere else are still trying to make.
Fusion is attainable, but not sustainable. The energy input required to even get a tiny spark is multitudes greater than the energy we get out of it.
But what the student did is still along the same lines as Korea is boasting as their great strides, yet vastly more impressive in my mind as it was done with second hand parts in a basement by a kid and the internet
ok.. I'll redefine my definition.Then by your definition both the kid and the Koreas, and a couple other projects out there have all had success in nuclear fusion because they've all created & contained it.
The problem comes with sustained fusion. Like the sun. Fusion itself, the process by which multiple atomic nuclei join together to form a single heavier nucleus, is quite possible and being done for a long time. But a sustained reaction like exhibited by the sun... that we don't have.
The Fat Man will arise.Because the problem with his design is still the same as with the larger designs Korea and everywhere else are still trying to make.
Fusion is attainable, but not sustainable. The energy input required to even get a tiny spark is multitudes greater than the energy we get out of it.
But what the student did is still along the same lines as Korea is boasting as their great strides, yet vastly more impressive in my mind as it was done with second hand parts in a basement by a kid and the internet
yep. Cold fusion has been promised and claimed several times, every single time it has been proven to be a hoax and un-replaceable. While we know it is possible (look at the sun) I sincerely doubt we will ever see man made cold fusion in our lifetimes.Then by your definition both the kid and the Koreas, and a couple other projects out there have all had success in nuclear fusion because they've all created & contained it.
The problem comes with sustained fusion. Like the sun. Fusion itself, the process by which multiple atomic nuclei join together to form a single heavier nucleus, is quite possible and being done for a long time. But a sustained reaction like exhibited by the sun... that we don't have.
ok.. I'll redefine my definition.Then by your definition both the kid and the Koreas, and a couple other projects out there have all had success in nuclear fusion because they've all created & contained it.
The problem comes with sustained fusion. Like the sun. Fusion itself, the process by which multiple atomic nuclei join together to form a single heavier nucleus, is quite possible and being done for a long time. But a sustained reaction like exhibited by the sun... that we don't have.
http://www.fusor.net/gez that makes the CO2 laser I made for my science faire seem horribly easy.
I'm thinking of making one to see if I can.
That's pretty much every engineers dream right there.[/QUOTE]Create and sustain it (CHEAPLY!)
yep. Cold fusion has been promised and claimed several times, every single time it has been proven to be a hoax and un-replaceable. While we know it is possible (look at the sun) I sincerely doubt we will ever see man made cold fusion in our lifetimes.[/QUOTE]Then by your definition both the kid and the Koreas, and a couple other projects out there have all had success in nuclear fusion because they've all created & contained it.
The problem comes with sustained fusion. Like the sun. Fusion itself, the process by which multiple atomic nuclei join together to form a single heavier nucleus, is quite possible and being done for a long time. But a sustained reaction like exhibited by the sun... that we don't have.
yep. Cold fusion has been promised and claimed several times, every single time it has been proven to be a hoax and un-replaceable. While we know it is possible (look at the sun) I sincerely doubt we will ever see man made cold fusion in our lifetimes.[/QUOTE]Then by your definition both the kid and the Koreas, and a couple other projects out there have all had success in nuclear fusion because they've all created & contained it.
The problem comes with sustained fusion. Like the sun. Fusion itself, the process by which multiple atomic nuclei join together to form a single heavier nucleus, is quite possible and being done for a long time. But a sustained reaction like exhibited by the sun... that we don't have.
Sure. Easy. Only about 2x10^30 kg of hydrogen. I've got that in a warehouse up the block.Fusion is easy to attain and sustain. You need just need shit-ton of hydrogen and let it condense under its own gravity. Dumbass CERN douchebags...