S
Soliloquy
since it's been such a long truce, but still a war... Does this mean we've still been at war with China this whole time, too?
Taiwan and China? or U.S. and China?since it's been such a long truce, but still a war... Does this mean we've still been at war with China this whole time, too?
Yea. Fighting in the modern time has gotten complex.We were never at war. It was a police action for us. North and South Korea were the ones at war.
Of course tell that to the 2 million casualties of that war, that it was not a war.
That's better.Yea. Fighting in the modern time has gotten convoluted.
That's better.[/QUOTE]Yea. Fighting in the modern time has gotten convoluted.
Yea. right now the North is rattling their sabers and what not. If they start shooting, lets pray the rest of the world are level headed.I think that technically, we haven't been at war since WWII.
So, here's to our 65 years of peace!
Hilary has been sweet talking China for awhile, trying to get them to agree to sanctions, I don't know how things are going with all out war though.I'm starting to think that the boiling pot with its ever increasing pressure is worse than it would be to just have it blow up and done with. Obama needs to sit down with Hu Jintao and try to talk China into siding with the rest of the world instead of North Korea... or nukes may start flying.
Hilary has been sweet talking China for awhile, trying to get them to agree to sanctions, I don't know how things are going with all out war though.[/QUOTE]I'm starting to think that the boiling pot with its ever increasing pressure is worse than it would be to just have it blow up and done with. Obama needs to sit down with Hu Jintao and try to talk China into siding with the rest of the world instead of North Korea... or nukes may start flying.
How did it work with Germany? Now I don't think ANYBODY would argue that East Germany was anywhere CLOSE to as backward as North Korea is right now, but still, it was an integration of two countries with radically different economic situations. What happened, how did it go, what were the consequences?The thing that worries me about the situation is even if we can get a regime change in NK, through war or what have you, the population has been held back so long by the Kim Family Bullshit that it will be difficult to set up a new gov't that will be free from the last 60 years.
How did it work with Germany? Now I don't think ANYBODY would argue that East Germany was anywhere CLOSE to as backward as North Korea is right now, but still, it was an integration of two countries with radically different economic situations. What happened, how did it go, what were the consequences?[/QUOTE]The thing that worries me about the situation is even if we can get a regime change in NK, through war or what have you, the population has been held back so long by the Kim Family Bullshit that it will be difficult to set up a new gov't that will be free from the last 60 years.
This. China has more than enough on it's plate right now just trying to keep the flow of information tightly controlled in their borders and they are failing more each and every day. They really don't need more territory right now, especially territory that would be highly dependent on them for many years.I don't think China actually *wants* North Korea to be part of China.
But then question is when does this buffer outweigh it's usefulness? China can't deny its people access to the outside world for much longer, as we already have Americans smuggling in software to bypass filtering software in other closed regimes (the news of the Iranian elections last year was largely provided by people using such software). They can't keep it up forever, and force of arms won't stop it.Do you think that China just wants N. Korea to be a geographical buffer between China and the highly-advanced outside world? That would explain why they reacted so violently to us chasing N. Korea to the border in the first Korean war, and why they want it still around despite all the issues that come from its existence?
Now that's a public service!You know, the funny thing is, I spend my time online telling Chinese to STFU about western things and western people that they're wrong about China.
Damn modern building materials!You guys realize that Jonzac has more metal on his uniform than there is in most of our houses, right?
If something does happen, why does everyone seem to think we will have a Korea at all? Even without nukes, the DPRK has a nation-destroying quantity of artillery pointed south. It seems to be conventional military wisdom that Seoul, at least, will be utterly flattened within minutes of hostilities breaking out.If something does happen, why does everyone seem to think we will have a unified korea? If we are so dependent on china being the big brother to approve our actions, who's to say they wouldn't get control of the the north?
Pfft, this is the internet, Dave. We're going to disagree with him out of pride.You guys realize that Jonzac has more metal on his uniform than there is in most of our houses, right?
While you guys have good thoughts and ideas I'm going to side with him as he's kind of the expert on NK's saber rattling.
Military Secret and all that JazzSeoul to the Han river would be hammered in the first 7 days. In fact, reduction of that threat is an important item, obviously. DPRK scuds and missiles/WMDs aren't really there to destroy ROK cities and such...but to ensure that the U.N. can't get additional forces into the country.
Although, I'm positive the ROK can stop the DPRK....they may take Seoul, but I don't see them getting South of the Han river again.
Editted:
I just thought I would say that it is NOT out of the realm of possiblity that the North could attack...My personal opinion is they will not, for several reasons...some of which I'm not going to post on a forum. I could be wrong...I hope I'm not, we certainly would have a hard time shifting forces to meet the threat...and more importantly I'm at the fucking Pentagon instead of with my old F-15E wing.
Military Secret and all that JazzSeoul to the Han river would be hammered in the first 7 days. In fact, reduction of that threat is an important item, obviously. DPRK scuds and missiles/WMDs aren't really there to destroy ROK cities and such...but to ensure that the U.N. can't get additional forces into the country.
Although, I'm positive the ROK can stop the DPRK....they may take Seoul, but I don't see them getting South of the Han river again.
Editted:
I just thought I would say that it is NOT out of the realm of possiblity that the North could attack...My personal opinion is they will not, for several reasons...some of which I'm not going to post on a forum. I could be wrong...I hope I'm not, we certainly would have a hard time shifting forces to meet the threat...and more importantly I'm at the fucking Pentagon instead of with my old F-15E wing.
That is such an awesome puppy.
That would be... interesting.North Korea has threatened Wednesday to block cross-border traffic and blow up any South Korean loudspeakers blasting propaganda northward as tensions soared over the sinking of a South Korean warship.