Americans only find themselves and Europe to be civilized, remember?
No, but we have lower birth rates i.e. our women have more choices and sexual freedoms.[/QUOTE]
Women in my 3rd world country have the same sexual freedoms as the women in most of the states in the US
don't you find "3rd world countries where women aren't usually pregnant by choice" a little over the top?
Unwanted pregnancy is an issue, but it's not the rule and not what "usually" happens.[/QUOTE]
The women in Mexico that have access to birth control have freedoms; the ones that don't- don't. A male contraceptive pill isn't going to change that. The reason birth rates are lower in developed countries has always hinged on the education and services provided to by women; not men.
With things like birth control, the U.S. isn't the problem. It's underdeveloped countries. Mexico is one of them. A male birth control pill isn't going to solve the problem. As other people have pointed out: yes, it does add an additional option. My argument wasn't based on the small niches that this pill is going to cover. On a global scale, its release is essentially worthless.
The big problem I see down the line, is the transmission of STD's because of false assumptionss, not only in areas where they think fucking a sheep will cure you of AIDS, but in the United States as well. More people will use less condoms because the looming specter of pregnancy will overshadow all other factors, like Herpes, HIV, Gonorrhea etc...