I love that DS skit... it even had a BP reference.At least the bill doesn't propose instituting pro-life Stork Bucks or outlawing "space abortions"...yet.
I'm telling ya man, Crazy Crown. There has to be one.Georgia takes a surprising lead over South Dakota!
That is true, but the really sad part is that such an idea is actually introduce as a bill in the first place.Fortunately it's usually only one or two wingnuts per term who somehow stumble into office. It doesn't take much to introduce a bill. Far more to get it to pass a wing of the legislature, and even more than that to get the governor's signature.
The press is getting these bills in their infancy. Very few have a snowball's chance of getting out of committee, let alone making it into law.
We can but hope.From the same man who brought us the "No Licenses" garbage.
I'm assuming that even the other Republican lawmakers in Georgia kind of roll their eyes and sigh when this guy talks.
'cause once you're outta the womb yer own yer own. Get a job, you damn hippie! 't ain't my fault ye can't even crawl yet!You know, if the world (as in the whole world) is having population issue I can understand why such laws would be put in place (well not miscarriage but other stuff) but currently we have children here in the U.S. and around the world STARVING and trying to live. Why not put that kind of power into use and help those kids that are already here? Why worry about the other "future" kids that may or may not be here?
It looks like they want to treat a miscarriage like the death of a child. So if a pregnant woman falls down the stairs and miscarries, she could face charges of criminal negligence and manslaughter.Just out of curiosity, isn't the legistation he's trying to pass say that only if the miscarriage is found to be forcefully caused be criminal? Other than abortion, if someone forcefully causes a miscarriage, I'd actually like to see some reprocussions toward that.
How would you prove it? Seriously. How? Short of it being done in full view of a security camera or a crowd of bystanders, I mean.I would be behind that if she purposely did it. Obviously not if it was an accident.
I see very little merit in this idea, it's just too extreme in it's current build.
Heh. Yup that is what he is claiming. So far after 40 years, U.S. is still going.Okay, just read the text of this bill. Not going to bring up the way it shifts the burden of proof, previous posters have covered the problems with that. Page 3 of the bill is...interesting though. Pretty much entirely given over to ranting about Roe vs.Wade, including this line:
"Compliance with, and continuation of, a fiat determination of the Supreme Court from nearly 40 years ago will cause the basis of this Union, and eventually the Union itself, to fall"
Did he just argue that Roe vs. Wade will lead to the dissolution of the entire United States of America?
Krisken is right. We need a Crazy Crown.