M
makare
Boughten is a word in the same sense as taken, written or sown.Boughten? God damn.
That's like that "Chronicles of George" and the "havening" (meaning "have" or "has")
You are dead to me.
Boughten is a word in the same sense as taken, written or sown.Boughten? God damn.
That's like that "Chronicles of George" and the "havening" (meaning "have" or "has")
When I use boughten (and it is colloquial I suppose but totally still a word) I would say "this or that thing was boughten instead of homemade". So yeah as an adjective. Although I suppose I might use it as "something had been boughten" like i would say "something had been written". I would never say I boughten something.
I wouldn't say "that had been written" or "I had written that". I'd use the active voice and say "I wrote that." Just like I'd say "I bought that"; not "I had boughten that".It is used the same way as written. What is a strong verb? If you mean active verb then yeah it isn't the active form so it wouldn't be used that way.
You wouldn't say "I written that" but it doesn't change the value of written as a word.
Imply... or implode?That is the second time you have said I imply things. I think the problem is you assume to much.
This is my nightmare scenario.When the pendulum swings and passive voice is popular again maybe boughten will return to the main stream
Well.. SO'S YOUR FACE!*I think it just sounds dumb.
No, the important thing is that the word was incorrectly. Perhaps it is in the O.E.D., but not for use in that context. I have no doubt the person I spoke to used it in place of bought, purchased, or acquired. It was used incorrectly, and it was a silly mistake that I would think a 29 year old man would avoid.Well.. SO'S YOUR FACE!*
No seriously, I don't care if people think it sounds dumb. It is mostly a colloquial thing anymore and so it doesn't really matter. It IS a word though. That is the important thing.
*I never get to say that in a context that makes sense
I did say I wouldn't use it that way. I think it is generally agreed that the person you talked to used it wrong. My initial response was to null's reacting in a way that seemed to suggest it wasn't a word at all.No, the important thing is that the word was incorrectly. Perhaps it is in the O.E.D., but not for use in that context. I have no doubt the person I spoke to used it in place of bought, purchased, or acquired. It was used incorrectly, and it was a silly mistake that I would think a 29 year old man would avoid.
I always say "The groceries had been bought....""The groceries had been boughten and the dinner had been made".
Take the Pirner look over Cobain. Cobain ended up with Courtney Love when Pirner was basically married to Winona Ryder...Dave Pirner? You, sir, offend. Cobain, maybe.
*gauntlet slap*
(I'm only 35, I just meant it more in a rounded sense.)
A lot of writers unfortunately also extrapolate their strict "no passive voice" rule to all writing. Passive voice certainly belongs in technical writing, or any place where the actor is either irrelevant or would be uncomfortably present in active voice. You can use active sentences when possible by shifting the action over to a non-human speaker ("A magnetic anomaly was present in the sample" vs. "Magnetic susceptibility testing showed an anomaly in sample THX1138"), but sometimes the second feels really off.It's passive voice and a lot of writers will tell you to avoid the passive voice whenever possible.
Ah science journals. That magical land where passive voice rules with an iron fist.A lot of writers unfortunately also extrapolate their strict "no passive voice" rule to all writing. Passive voice certainly belongs in technical writing, or any place where the actor is either irrelevant or would be uncomfortably present in active voice. You can use active sentences when possible by shifting the action over to a non-human speaker ("A magnetic anomaly was present in the sample" vs. "Magnetic susceptibility testing showed an anomaly in sample THX1138"), but sometimes the second feels really off.
Ugh. I was trained to write the passive voice for technical papers and I am doing everything I can to undo that training.I really don't know why 'boughten' has become the embiggened topic of this thread. Let's all just agree that it's a perfectly cromulant word to use.
Added at: 10:18
Ah science journals. That magical land where passive voice rules with an iron fist.
Dear internet,
Please stop using 'Epic'.
Sincerely
Me.
It's not necessarily wrong. I think too many people are rapping knuckles with the "No Passive Voice" stick. Sometimes it's appropriate. Chaining 10 passive sentences together on the other hand is professor-grade sedative. I think a bigger problem is padding and prepositional phrase chaining. Dear students, stop using "as well as" instead of "and", etc. And stop writing sentences like, "The measurement of the length of the grain of the mineral in the rock from the basin in the Gulf of Mexico." That sentence is like 3 times longer than it should be.Ugh. I was trained to write the passive voice for technical papers and I am doing everything I can to undo that training.
Yeah, I use a blend of active and passive at the moment. I'm not sure I like even that, really. In psychology research, you really do have to consider the experimenter. We are studying people and, as social animals, being people can influence that. I think it is worthwhile in my discipline to acknowledge that I (or my research assistants) were actors in the experiment, even if we have removed as much of that influence as possible. It was ultimately I that created the stimuli and the researchers who administered the instructions, etc.It's not necessarily wrong. I think too many people are rapping knuckles with the "No Passive Voice" stick. Sometimes it's appropriate. Chaining 10 passive sentences together on the other hand is professor-grade sedative. I think a bigger problem is padding and prepositional phrase chaining. Dear students, stop using "as well as" instead of "and", etc. And stop writing sentences like, "The measurement of the length of the grain of the mineral in the rock from the basin in the Gulf of Mexico." That sentence is like 3 times longer than it should be.