You know my other pet peeve? DUI apologists. The people who always show up in the comments section (I know, I know,
don't read the comments) of news stories where some drunk and/or high driver has killed someone and talk about how the DUI driver shouldn't be punished too harshly, because they'll learn a valuable lesson from it, and it wasn't intentional. First, it fucking is intentional if you know you've been drinking or doing drugs and you voluntarily get in your car and drive somewhere. No one forced you to drive, and if they did, we wouldn't be talking about a DUI driver, we'd be talking about a car jacking. Second, we have people who don't get seriously jail time until their 5th or 6th or more time of not just driving altered, but actually being caught driving altered, and even then they're only harshly punished if they managed to kill or seriously injure someone else. So no, they're not going to fucking "learn a valuable lesson."
We had a DUI accident just 9 days ago where the 29ish year old uncle loaded his 9 year old nephew and 8 year old niece in his car to drive them to their grandmother's house after a family reunion where he'd apparently been drinking and smoking pot. He took an exit off the highway, rolled his car, the nephew was ejected, and died the following day after being taken off of life support by his family. The apologists showed up almost immediately. "Oh, don't punish the poor driver. He'll learn his lesson from having killed his nephew, and he won't do this again."
So what happens today? 50 or 60 year old fucking little league coach is driving drunk and/or high and slams into 4 pedestrians in an intersection in a residential neighborhood, killing two of them and sending the other two (including a two week old baby) to the hospital in critical condition with severe head injuries. Sure, it's not the same guy, but it's only going to be a matter of time before some jackass pops up in the comments talking about how, since the drunk is a little league coach, and a child was injured, he's going to feel sooooooo bad about what he did that he'll never do it again.
We need to find some actual form of a deterrent to get it into people's fucking heads that it's not OK to drive drunk. Taking their license away isn't going to do it, people drive without a license all the time. Same with taking away their ability to get insurance, people drive without that all the time too. Interlock devices? That only really helps if the person who's been given the device actually really wants to stop driving drunk but is a hardcore alcoholic with poor decision making skills. It's not going to stop partiers from drinking and driving and either a) getting someone else to blow in the device or b) driving someone else' car home. And then we've got all of the damn DUI lawyers always running ads about how they can get you out of the $5k fine or get you out of any jail time you might get for being pulled over while driving drunk. How the fuck is that helping us?![DOUBLEPOST=1364264959][/DOUBLEPOST]
I'm Canadian, so I'm ignorant of this: are you penalised in schools for refusing to say the Pledge? I think I would also refuse, although not for your wife's reasons.
We weren't punished in any of our schools, unless we were being disruptive of the rest of the class.
Edit: And then we weren't being punished for not saying the pledge, we were being punished for being disruptive little shit heads. Because mostly we were unruly, disruptive little shit heads, and I have no idea how our teachers put up with us.