It's not necessarily wrong. I think too many people are rapping knuckles with the "No Passive Voice" stick. Sometimes it's appropriate. Chaining 10 passive sentences together on the other hand is professor-grade sedative. I think a bigger problem is padding and prepositional phrase chaining. Dear students, stop using "as well as" instead of "and", etc. And stop writing sentences like, "The measurement of the length of the grain of the mineral in the rock from the basin in the Gulf of Mexico." That sentence is like 3 times longer than it should be.
Not in science. Science papers are boring as fuck as a result.Huh. Here I thought that people preferred an occasional "as well as" instead of always reading "and". I never felt like I was padding my papers when I switched up my phrasing. Maybe it seemed like it from the other side and I never knew it.
Well, it works well for English papers. There's nothing wrong with that. It's just that students need to learn that different fields require different writing styles.That's been a problem for my students as well. I think it stems from English Lit classes teaching them to flower their sentences with padded bullshit. That's just the way that field is. Science requires you to pack a butt-ton of information in as few words as possible. Not in science. Science papers are boring as fuck as a result.
Not really. Any sort of writing that gets padded with purple prose and other shit generally sucks.Well, it works well for English papers. There's nothing wrong with that. It's just that students need to learn that different fields require different writing styles.
There's a difference between purple prose and using stylistic choices like passive voice on occasion.Not really. Any sort of writing that gets padded with purple prose and other shit generally sucks.
Hey, I'm with you! I try to take my lessons on scientific writing from short prose. Keep it concise and interesting (but also complete and honest).I know in general we agree that going into painfully boring detail and being descriptive to the point of distraction is bad form. On that I agree with Mathias and Mind Detective. I just think that being clinical to the point of being dry can be just as painful.
So you read a 500 page version? I think I'd have liked that version more.I really like LotR but I think my brain auto skipa any unneeded or long winded details.
I totally agree. Like I said, I love conversationally written papers. I know several authors in my field whose papers are actually fun to read. That doesn't necessarily mean purple prose or the like. An example of conversational style might be: "Now consider the often-maligned role the atmospheric electric field plays in collection of field data...." versus "Data as well as additional effects of fields originating from the environment must be considered in order to understand..."Hey, I'm with you! I try to take my lessons on scientific writing from short prose. Keep it concise and interesting (but also complete and honest).
Well trees, and walking... then walking trees....What makes LotR painful to read is that he'll spend 5 pages talking about the fucking trees. That's hardly the same as varying the word choice.
Blugh, oh yeah.YES. Totally. I cannot stand endless debate. I really hate it when the debate starts to circulate around and repeat. Any group involving the moms of elementary age kids seems to do this. It's actually the reason I'm probably not leading a cub scout den next year. I can't bear the leader meetings, which usually involve discussing the same one topic over and over. "Who is bringing the cups Monday?" "I am".. (three minutes of dull conversation).."Who is bringing the cups Monday?" ...
Yup. Anyone who has run a role playing group knows this is truth.Blugh, oh yeah.
I really think four people is the perfect sized group for when you are going to be out and about. You can make decisions quickly, keep track of each other, get into a restaurant easily, etc. Six is and alright number too. Once you hit eight people you run into issues with the group being too big and you may as well just split into two fours.