sad but trueUnless it ends up in every paper in the state, it will get tossed out.
Especially if it's delayed until the Recall attempts start coming in. If they lose even one guy, they'll have to wait for the election and if it's a Dem who's elected then the whole thing is over. They must be panicking at this point.Not good for Walker and the GOP. The longer this plays out, the more it hurts them.
That's absolutely hilarious and filled with win.He also asked the officer if he knew "Snoop Dog." The officer said he did not, and again told the man not to touch people who do not want to be touched.
Fucking A, someone gets it.WBTeacher said:As many people know, West Bend prides itself on being extremely conservative. As someone who is quite frugal herself, I can appreciate that. However, the upcoming budget severely impacts the West Bend School District. As one of the lowest-spending districts while also being one of the largest districts in the state, these proposed cuts will damage the district. Glenn Grothman claimed that he was led to believe that Walker would make provisions for low-spending districts like West Bend. Either Grothman lied or Walker did, because the news the WB School District staff received today is that the district stands to lose $6.8 million dollars next year, $2.9 of which will be subsidized by the concessions made by employees. Now the district has to find a way to cut an
additional $3.8 million dollars. What does that mean? Significant reductions in teachers and programs available to students, as well as increased class sizes, etc.. The following year will bring about even more cuts. Unfortunately, you can only cut so much all the way around before it impacts the quality of education provided. For those taxpayers who only look at the bottom dollar on their tax bill, you are seriously mistaken if you don't believe these tremendous cuts aren't going to impact you. Who will want to move to West Bend? Your home values will significantly decrease and for those who work in the private sector, you can be guaranteed to see far less spending taking place by the community members, thus impacting businesses. Eleven hundred people are employed by the WB school district; when each one loses 10% of their take-home pay, there is no longer money available to be spent on consumer goods. My guess is, however, that those teachers will not be taking extreme joy when the private sector is impacted, as many in the private sector are currently rejoicing at the cuts that their friends and neighbors are about to take. Do not be so ignorant as to think that these cuts will not trickle down to all.
Don't forget to cut band, cheerleading, track, hockey, basketball, and football too. Sure it'll make school suck all that more, but think of the SAVINGS!You know, there are times when I see ridiculous cuts to education coupled with claims that teachers are root of all evil, and I think to myself "Just fucking do it. Slash education, put 70 kids in a classroom, get rid of all their books, and eliminate every class that isn't a math or science. Then we'll see how happy you stupid assholes are." Of course that would never be acceptable because kids would be hurt worst of all, but it's tempting.
Oh, didn't you hear? We're a drain on society with our luxurious salaries. Besides, ask any pundit: when a kid does well, it's because he/she was raised right, possesses a strong independent work ethic, and is naturally gifted. If a kid does poorly, it's because the teacher is an incompetent loser who couldn't find a real job.I am still trying to figure out on how the whole national "increase" education is going to work if they keep cutting teacher's pay.
I don't think anyone really disagrees with you here as opposed to disagreeing with the implication that the entire budget and school system can be fixed by outlawing collective bargaining. That's ultimately what Walker and the GOPers in the state legislation are trying to say.Dunno if I am mispercieving this but I seriously dislike the implication that Teachers Unions are inherently a good thing for the education system and students, and all teachers support them, because that's a pretty bold claim. Personally I agree with Teacher's Unions on certain aspects (increasing pay, increasing funding, promoting LBGT teacher rights, against No Child Left Behind) but MASSIVELY disagree with them on many many other stances (against merit based pay, against school vouchers, against Teach For America)
Generally they maintain the same unfavorable stances that many unions do, where they support the interests of their members above the interests of the business they work in. In the cases I mentioned this is done by removing competion which *could* remove motivation for performance.
Just don't assume that the damage to unions is inherently bad for students, because that's a totally different argument. Now, it most likely IS bad for Teachers, that's a no brainer.
I believe Governor Walker has poisoned labor relations for years to come, ensuring the failure of his administration. Compromise is not a dirty word. It is an integral part of politics and the collective bargaining process. Anyone who thinks otherwise should not be in politics or in a leadership position. As Edmund Burke said, "All government, indeed every human benefit and enjoyment, and every prudent act, is founded on compromise and barter."
that is exactly what the Wisconsin GOP is thinking. No Collective Bargaining = save money. Oh, and slash education budget!I don't think anyone really disagrees with you here as opposed to disagreeing with the implication that the entire budget and school system can be fixed by outlawing collective bargaining. That's ultimately what Walker and the GOPers in the state legislation are trying to say.
And then give that money to corporations. Oh, and if the education system gets bad enough, the people will be begging to have it privatized.that is exactly what the Wisconsin GOP is thinking. No Collective Bargaining = save money. Oh, and slash education budget!