* that didn't keep the formatting very well, just check out the link.The federally budgeted (see below) military expenditure of the United States Department of Defense for fiscal year 2010, including the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, is[8]:
Components Funding Change, 2009 to 2010
Operations and maintenance $283.3 billion +4.2%
Military Personnel $154.2 billion +5.0%
Procurement $140.1 billion −1.8%
Research, Development, Testing & Evaluation $79.1 billion +1.3%
Military Construction $23.9 billion +19.0%
Family Housing $3.1 billion −20.2%
Total Spending $685.1 billion +3.0%
Bah, I am plenty efficient. Though my contracting company actually hires competent people unlike, say, SAIC.Honestly, there is really only one reason to use contractors: If a contractor dies, no one gives a fuck. It's not on the news, it's not in the papers. In every other way they are simply too inefficient.
Doesn't matter. I already heard that 80% of the military budget goes to making nuclear weapons and baby-murder. Your "facts" aren't going to change that.Jesus christ, you people. Instead of speculation, how hard is it to do a damn Google search?
It took two seconds for the wiki page witht he information.
School of the Arts, Institute of Chicago?Bah, I am plenty efficient. Though my contracting company actually hires competent people unlike, say, SAIC.
heh. well it can be use as an energy source (well nuclear tech anyways) plus it sounds better than be under militaryunder the DOE? huh, learn something new every day.
lol no, it stands for Science Applications International Corporation.School of the Arts, Institute of Chicago?
You know, I wonder how the "operations and maintenance" and "procurement" costs break down. If a large part of those costs are contract fees/mark-up to providers or inventory management (as opposed to straight material costs), there may well be a lot of room to re-do the bidding process and streamline operations a bit.I figured, I would give some (really, really, really) rough numbers and if he cared to refute them then he could look it up. Obviously according to the two posts that show the budget, R&D is only a small part of the budget.
The bidding comes from what contractor gives the biggest campaign contribution to the Congresspeople in question.What bidding process? I was under the impression that the Government was still awarding no bid contracts.
Change it from an income to a sales tax, and you just described the Fair Tax. It sends monthly prebate checks for the expected amount of sales tax expenditure of the necessities of life for your family, abolishes all your federal income taxes, and replaces it with a national sales tax. Practical upshot? The poor still pay no/little taxes, the ultrarich still pay huge amounts of it, with the bonus of nailing the Paris Hilton types who are super rich but have no actual "income" to be taxed but spend like crazy. Plus, the added benefit of having no embedded taxation means it's cheaper to hire employees, salaries can be higher, products cost less, which pretty much works to cancel out the sales tax so that you end up paying the same on the bottom line WITH the sales tax as you did before WITHOUT... only without the IRS swiping a big chunk of your paycheck every other week.Flat tax, but you don't pay ANY taxes on whatever is considered below the poverty line. So say $25k (or whatever), and that amount goes up with inflation and/or cost of living. So below that, 0%, above that, all pay 35% (or whatever). No exemptions, nothing. Make it absolutely as simple as possible, while keeping the idea that "we're not taxing you to live... at least on income tax." Other taxes are a whole other can of worms.
How many people in Canada/USA/1st world would not be paying ANY income taxes? Would be interesting.
Well, whatever method of tax reform we use, the fastest way to make it happen would be to eliminate mandatory withholding. If people actually realized how much of their money was being siphoned off, without it being disguised as a few hundred dollars each paycheck, there'd be a march. Or perhaps a riot.No thanks, give me Eriol's version.
In my mind, protecting the idiotic from the consequences of their actions is one of the reasons we're in such trouble on a number of fronts.Yeah, because it doesn't help to prevent tax evasion by morons too stupid to save money back for taxes.
Current federal taxes on productivity are embedded in the cost of everything you buy. Eliminating those taxes would mean that the cost of those goods would fall a roughly equivalent amount to what the end sales tax would be. MoreThe real problem would be getting people to accept a 30% markup on everything they bought. It could work out to be cheaper than income tax, but it's hard to make the mental connection.
So your solution is to put more people in jail then? See where the problem is here? It's not protecting the stupid, it's preventing the stupid from mucking up the entire system.In my mind, protecting the idiotic from the consequences of their actions is one of the reasons we're in such trouble on a number of fronts.
I'm sure you can just get them a cabinet position.So your solution is to put more people in jail then? See where the problem is here? It's not protecting the stupid, it's preventing the stupid from mucking up the entire system.
Well, in Gas's tax system, there isn't any back taxes. You just pay the tax as you buy stuff. No more income tax, corporate tax, medicade and SS tax. So at the link he provided lets say it is a flat rate of 25% (23% seems to be the "average") then anything you buy you just pay 25% extra BUTWell, since private prisons are the fastest growing industry in the country, I guess we could just bring back debtor's prison.
Which, of course, would kill the poor. Can you imagine someone who makes $15k a year paying that much in sales tax?Well, in Gas's tax system, there isn't any back taxes. You just pay the tax as you buy stuff. No more income tax, corporate tax, medicade and SS tax. So at the link he provided lets say it is a flat rate of 25% (23% seems to be the "average") then anything you buy you just pay 25% extra BUT
You don't get tax deduction from your paycheck anymore. Depending on what you put (0,1 or more) it takes a good chuck out of it.
Actually, MY solution is a sales tax in which the stupid don't have to do anything at all, except maybe know how to cash a prebate check.So your solution is to put more people in jail then? See where the problem is here? It's not protecting the stupid, it's preventing the stupid from mucking up the entire system.
It'd be less than they're already paying in income tax. As a matter of fact, their prebate checks would actually be bigger than the amount of taxes they're expected to pay. And if they have more kids, the checks are also bigger.Which, of course, would kill the poor. Can you imagine someone who makes $15k a year paying that much in sales tax?
Couple of things. I am going to use pseudo numbers since I don't have my paystub with me.There is no way i can tackle the number of assumptions made in that mess. Congratulations, you win by me not caring to spend all day refuting every assumption you made.