Dave
Staff member
Really? I always thought that I treated you well. I'm wounded.but no one here cares about me
Really? I always thought that I treated you well. I'm wounded.but no one here cares about me
lol what?I think you would be surprised how many people enjoy your posts and even your points of view when you take time to discuss them be they about movies or politics.
Well, it's only fair. You don't believe in his contradictory pro-looting anarchist socialist hippie feminazi persona.You know, that hurt. Coming from you Charlie? That really stung.
Totally. I've had some great talks with chuck about movies and stuff.lol what?
you serious?
I may completely differ with you on certain feminist ideals, but when it comes to socioeconomic problems, I see eye to eye with you.Well I am a minority here that challenges the status quo
but no one here cares about me
Rioting like this isn't something that happens due to consensus. You're right. People who loot are not evil. They're taking advantage of a situation that's a direct result of being fucked over all their lives. Everyone can pretty much agree that it's not right to loot stores. People who do it don't magically lack morals. Furthermore, the argument that poor people are lazy and drug users and that's why they're poor is a cop out. I don't even know where to start ripping up Officer Charon's comment. The system is what holds everyone down to their born-in class. If anyone actually believes the U.S.A/U.K. rags to riches bullshit, I don't even think I can hold a serious discussion with them about this. Sure, a few people get lucky, but wealth (especially in America) is due to what family you're born into and as a result who you know. For example, does anyone seriously think that a Harvard education is any better than Po-dunk University? You get into Harvard through wealth, and you graduate from Harvard with wealthy connections. I could write a thesis on this. I really could, but all I can say to sum up is:Something similar happened in France recently as well. Mostly lower socie-economic muslim youth who couldn't get hired, generally due to racism. It doesn't make the rioting right, but it means you can't just sweep it under the rug and say, oh it's because they are just bad people. It's not that easy.
You're talking as though a sparked riot is something that's organized. When you have a lot of angry people focusing that energy in one spot, it's not going to be pretty.But to refer to the UK as a police state is... not correct. I mean, there are really people suffering under legitimate police states. If you live in a country where you can organize and express your discontent, and you get ignored, here's a tip: you're not living in a police state.
I could argue that mob rule and mass hysteria do not involve rational thought out logic. It's not even about justification. It's about grabbing a small piece of the pie for yourself. Of course, it's all rooted in the whole propaganda of Capitalistic greed that's pumped into our brains since birth.There's a line between looting because you feel justified because the system kept you down and purposefully trashing and setting a place on fire.
Oh, sorry, that's not what I meant, but I see the confusion. What I'm saying is that people who can organize (under 'normal' circumstances) to protest, or form advocacy groups, etc. are not being oppressed by the state. I understand that riot is not usually a coordinated event.You're talking as though a sparked riot is something that's organized. When you have a lot of angry people focusing that energy in one spot, it's not going to be pretty.
I repeat, grabbing something for yourself is one thing. Burning down a city block is another. I would know.I could argue that mob rule and mass hysteria do not involve rational thought out logic. It's not even about justification. It's about grabbing a small piece of the pie for yourself. Of course, it's all rooted in the whole propaganda of Capitalistic greed that's pumped into our brains since birth.
Well, I'd say yes and no. I mean we can freely protest in the USA over various state issues. The state won't deny your right to protest, but that doesn't mean it won't continue setting up nanny type laws that are on the fringe of police state. But yeah, I doubt you could protest the state in China, like you can in the US.Oh, sorry, that's not what I meant, but I see the confusion. What I'm saying is that people who can organize (under 'normal' circumstances) to protest, or form advocacy groups, etc. are not being oppressed by the state. I understand that riot is not usually a coordinated event.
And I also repeat that mob rule doesn't give a crap about what's right and wrong. In the heat of the moment, it's no holds barred.I repeat, grabbing something for yourself is one thing. Burning down a city block is another. I would know.
Whether a person is conscious of it at the time doesn't change what it is.And I also repeat that mob rule doesn't give a crap about what's right and wrong. In the heat of the moment, it's no holds barred.
That judge is a great example of one guy who got lucky and broke out of his class strata. These are the people that keep the "rags to riches" myth alive among the social elite. Cudos for him, but the reality is that the odds were in his favor and certain events in his life pointed in the right direction to achieve that social success.Perhaps but a single example but... This man is an example of boot-strapping of the finest order. The community he was born into is one that I patrol on occasion, and is notorious in the area for being the go-to spot for crack and, increasingly, meth.
But he realized what he had to do, buckled down in school, and applied himself. I have nothing but respect for him.
Yes, perhaps I was far too generic in my statements... I had an image in my mind of what I wanted to say, but it didn't come across as cleanly as I wanted it to.
Mathias: Your final argument there is sort of lacking, though... look at the Vancouver riots, sparked by nothing more than a hockey loss. The primary demographic there was middle class white youths, looting and pillaging just the same as anyone else... and I challenge you to tell me that Vancouver is an oppressive society.
I don't remember defending anyone who loots. All I'm saying is that in the same situation, under those same conditions anyone would turn into a looter/vandal. My point is that we're all the same, and those that turn there nose to people who loot in these situations are in some serious self denial. Hell, even the example of the Vancouver riots is guilty of this. Anyone of you (and I) would do the same thing those drunks did in Vancouver if you were in their shoes.Whether a person is conscious of it at the time doesn't change what it is.
That's likely because most Americans don't care about international politics beyond:As a corollary, we had the G-8 conference here in Savannah back in '04. I think there was 1 lackluster protest during the entire convention.
I'm not trying to incite that all riots are due to oppression, just that this one is. I think as a general rule when you get a massive amount of angry people together, shit can go down pretty bad.Distinction duly noted.
And the WTO riots that occurred in Seattle? (not challenging for the sake of challenging - honestly interested in a counterpoint).
As a corollary, we had the G-8 conference here in Savannah back in '04. I think there was 1 lackluster protest during the entire convention.
in utero?I liked Tiq better before he became an angry dipshit.
HERE WE GO!
Now you're being purposely contradictory. Tiq's points were solid, well founded, and meaningful from a first person perspective.I liked Tiq better before he became an angry dipshit.
HERE WE GO!
Really? To me they sounded like angry spouted garbage that didn't comprehend the least bit of what I was saying. YOU FEEL SORRY FOR THE LOOTERS??!?!?!! DEY TOOK OUR JERBS!Now you're being purposely contradictory. Tiq's points were solid, well founded, and meaningful from a first person perspective.