Women Rule and Men Drool..... Says CNN.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't know about that, if the article is to be taken as truth, as soon as women can procreate 100% without a man's assistance (pretty much a possibility around the corner) you're going to become obsolete and left behind to fend for yourselves.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
The Founding Fathers believed, and the evidence still shows, that industriousness, marriage and religion are a very important basis


I did not expect to find this in a shego-linked article.
 
Oh, you'll still keep us around just to be entertained by all the stupid things we do.
Oh I have plans, but it won't be the stupid things you do that will entertain me. Throwing a sandwich into an arena to watch two starving men fight to the death, while throngs of loin cloth and bare chested women lay at my throne? That'll be entertaining. The best part, is the sandwich is laced with a slow killing poison invented by some gorgeous female scientist in my labs. The sandwich? Was made by another male slave. Just to add to the symphony of irony.
 
Okay, now seriously, after reading this:

The Founding Fathers believed, and the evidence still shows, that industriousness, marriage and religion are a very important basis for male empowerment and achievement.
I'm looking forward to the follow up piece lamenting the modern woman's lack of dishwashing and pie-making skills.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
I thought men have been dumb on tv since its inception?
The glorification of the immature male, the underachiever, is relatively new. A whole lot more of our movie and TV "heroes" these days are unemployable slacker dudes with little assertiveness and no ambition in life other than to suffer through the minimum amount of grown-up stuff they have to put up with to fund their gaming/pot habit. I know - there but for the grace of god go even I.

Sure, Robert Petrie was a goofball, but he was a hard working, sole-breadwinning TV executive with a wife and child. Somewhere along the line, Maynard Krebs stopped being comic relief and Dobie Gillis started being the jerk/villain.
 
Besides, this is good news for us hard-working, family raising men of good moral character. Our fine traits will make us Gods in a sea of tea-bagging, Xbox-playing "bros". In ten years, I might be lording over my very own harem.

You know...if my wife says it's cool.
 
M

makare

Seriously though I wish that assessing college attendance by gender wasn't so important. Why can't we look at it as a total percentage of potential workforce instead of by gender. That just frustrates me.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
And it doesn't just have to be "gamers." Think about the 3 male leads on "Friends." The only one approaching classical "manliness" is a perpetually unemployed/underemployed actor who sponges an existence off his best friend. The other two are a geek wuss and a "childhood issues" wuss.
 
M

makare

Well but really how common was actual classical manliness anyway? Maybe tv is just showing more of what average guys have always been like. Not the gamer thing but the just average joe guys not mahnly mahns.
 
I thought men have been dumb on tv since its inception?
I've seen a few of the older TV shows where women were pretty much the opposite of what they're portrayed like on TV today. Lucielle Ball comes to mind. Only time you see a women acting that stupid/slapstick is on SNL.
Added at: 21:04
I've seen a few of the older TV shows where women were pretty much the opposite of what they're portrayed like on TV today. Lucielle Ball comes to mind. Only time you see a women acting that stupid/slapstick is on SNL.
Also the man was "classier" too (Ricky Ricardo).
Added at: 21:05
Ugh I meant to quote Makare's post about classical manliness back then.
 
M

makare

I am not saying all guys were dumb but it was a common theme since the beginning. I mean the Honeymooners comes to mind.
 
I am not saying all guys were dumb but it was a common theme since the beginning. I mean the Honeymooners comes to mind.
I'm not sure if Jackie Gleason's character was supposed to be an idiot, and he definitely wasn't a slacker.

Over the last few years there have been a lot of romantic comedies and sitcoms based around lead male characters that were essentially happy losers, or at least immature man-children.
 
M

makare

Ralph Kramden was a doofus. My husband the lovable dolt that was the theme.
 
I don't know about that, if the article is to be taken as truth, as soon as women can procreate 100% without a man's assistance (pretty much a possibility around the corner) you're going to become obsolete and left behind to fend for yourselves.
 
are they roasting captain picard?
Obviously in a future full of almost entirely women, they are going to be Kirk fans.

Actually, looking at the image again, I think that is Kirk's head located to the right. Either Sisko is the luckiest man alive, or all these women love Captain Janeway and worship her like a god.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Ralph Kramden was a doofus. My husband the lovable dolt that was the theme.
Low intelligence and class, sure, but he was also a career bus driver with deeply ingrained notions of what it meant to be a man - to be in charge, to be assertive, to be a breadwinner. Whenever any of those things were threatened, he became severely unhappy.

Look at the old examples of leading men in media. They basically range from Fred Flintstone to Ward Cleaver. The slackers or less masculine men were relegated to comic relief or other such sidelines. Hell, even Gilligan, the complete antithesis for pre-generation X manliness, was the hardest working screwup you ever did see - and he was gainfully employed (until the storm, of course). He and the Skipper were just working class schlubs, but they were *working,* not slacking.

The closest these guys ever came to today's slacker heroes was when Fred and Barney would occasionally sneak out of the house, perhaps under false pretenses, to go bowling. But even that was a temporary diversion. Fred's justification for his self, his identity, was his work. It's why George Jetson and Dagwood Bumstead were forever absolutely terrified of losing their jobs even though they worked for horrible tyrants - if they weren't providing for their wives and children, they suffered soul-crushing bouts of depression and anxiety.

A far cry away from the typical male media hero of today, like Seth Rogen's character in "Knocked up" - a perpetually unemployed illegal canadian living in a house with 5 other guys whose only income is an old injury settlement who spends his days either drunk or playing video games with absolutely no plan or care for the future. And we're supposed to identify with his struggles.

We're a generation of men raised to admire - even envy - Bart Simpson, Dave Chappelle, Randall Graves and Jeffrey "The Dude" Lebowski.
 
I'll worry about men when the fundamental systems of society prevent them from making any worthwhile achievements, or society itself treats them as inferior cattle to be used and abused. In the meantime, I'm not going to shed a tear if more guys are acting like immature dumbasses. I have no sympathy for self-inflicted wounds.
 
@GasB - Well well written. That's pretty much exactly what I was going for but half-reading-posting at work is killing my concentration.
 
M

makare

I've concluded that as usual you are completely missing my point, so this is the last post I'll be making.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
The classic representation of the successful male in society had very little to do with his intelligence.... was the point the rest of us have failed to make you understand it seems. It was never about who was "stupid."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top