I'm thinking you are. I'm talking about living in a world where the movies don't exist. Not in the universe the movies portrayed.I like how people are confusing the question within the first few posts.
My Answer: LotR universe. Multi-tude of reasons. Mostly becase: Magic > Force
For the better though?Star Wars changed movies forever.
Lord of the Rings just got a bunch of Oscars it didn't deserve and pumped some money into New Zealand.
No no no. You must choose. It must be one or the other.I can't choose!
I love LotR (just marathoned the extended blu-rays and the love has deepened). I find them well acted, well paced and they took the right parts from the books.
I also love Star Wars and this love has grown watching Jet experience it.
So, it's a toss up.
The kids (14-16, couldn't tell) sitting behind me (and not shutting the fuck up) tonight when I went and saw Chronicle were pretty impressed by the Battleship trailer.My film professor marks Star Wars as the official start of the death of cinema.
In a way he's right. As witnessed by the current trend of films, explosions win out over character development every time when it comes to the film going experience.
Kind of sad, really.
I like how people are confusing the question within the first few posts.
My Answer: LotR universe. Multi-tude of reasons. Mostly becase: Magic > Force
I'm with you on jar jar and Anakin, but I thought Yoda's fight scenes were the best in the series, aside from the Darth Maul fight.And mother****ing this:
Those images were carved into my mind, and they actually took out a good chunk of the magic and enjoyment I had felt when watching the original trilogy. And reading the articles where George Lucas keeps saying he'll change more... I lost hope when it comes to Star Wars. For me, the movies I loved as a kid are gone.
Therefore, I choose the universe with LotR in it. And spare you the fanboyish rant why I loved them
I just have to agree with Plinkett when it comes to scenes with Yoda and his lightsaber: in the original trilogy, Yoda was a wise old sage who did not need a lightsaber. The Force was his ally, he didn't need to resort to violence and weaponry. He was a philosopher, a sage, a scholar. Not a bouncing ball of green that looks like he should be going "Arriba! Arriba! Andele! Andele!".I'm with you on jar jar and Anakin, but I thought Yoda's fight scenes were the best in the series, aside from the Darth Maul fight.
I could think of worse ways to spend one's years. Good company, good food, lovely neighbourhood, tobacco/weed with no side effects... and no Sand People to f*** up your moisture vaporators.a respectable Hobbit living in Hobbiton with no inclination for any sort of adventure.
Agreed. Yoda was still old as fuck during the events of ep. I-III. I could buy it if it was perhaps 500 years earlier and he was only a Jedi Knight. Yoda was beyond using a lightsaber as much as a Jedi Knight was beyond using a blaster.I just have to agree with Plinkett when it comes to scenes with Yoda and his lightsaber: in the original trilogy, Yoda was a wise old sage who did not need a lightsaber. The Force was his ally, he didn't need to resort to violence and weaponry. He was a philosopher, a sage, a scholar. Not a bouncing ball of green that looks like he should be going "Arriba! Arriba! Andele! Andele!".
I could think of worse ways to spend one's years. Good company, good food, lovely neighbourhood, tobacco/weed with no side effects... and no Sand People to f*** up your moisture vaporators.
Fixed.Except life's short if you're a redshirt.
The 'heroes' in both universes can be very exceptional people, true. But I don't think that means even a fairly average person couldn't experience something akin to an 'adventure'.As for living in either universe...
Fact is none of you would live as the "heroes".
Star Wars: YOU would be Lars Owen.
Lord of the Rings: YOU would be a farmer living in the West Fold, or a respectable Hobbit living in Hobbiton with no inclination for any sort of adventure.
shitty farm or shitty planet. hmmmmm