I'm pretty sure that was the Image Board days. I didn't join that one until December of 2005.Were we around when this one came out? I can't remember when the Halfpixel forums were set up. This was in May 2005.
To use "effect" as a verb there would imply Brent was the cause of all those regional sales, not just the purchases he himself made. So the correction was valid.Oh, wow. Going back through these comics I'm remembering the weirdest random things. Like how we corrected a typo on this comic (you can still see how the "a" in "affect" looks a little off), but there were people on the forum who were arguing that Kurtz really did mean to use the obscure verb form of "effect."
Man, the Halfpixel days were weird.
Yeah, it's happening. http://penny-arcade.com/comic/2012/02/29 (Temporarily).To mirror today's PvP comic, Scott should now simply walk away from it and let someone else take over.
Meh, heard one Starbucks slam ya heard em all.I really like today's dig at Starbucks.
Why do I get the feeling Francis has basically traded one devil for another?
A.) He is trying to be silly.More the point, why the fuck is Kurtz acting like that character is a real person, asking him to post a survey in his blog?
Don't forget tastemaker.A.) He is trying to be silly.
B.) The pressure of helping pioneer the web-comics genre making him an internet celebrity has made him gone insane and can't tell reality from fiction any-more.
I am going with B.
Taste-maker? I'm lost.Don't forget tastemaker.
Oh, I thought your using the word "pioneer" was referring to Scott's claim "I am a tastemaker and pioneer in my field" from a couple years back.Taste-maker? I'm lost.
Oh no, that was just my personal opinion. Is that from the web-comics book? I've had that forever and still haven't got around to reading it.Oh, I thought your using the word "pioneer" was referring to Scott's claim "I am a tastemaker and pioneer in my field" from a couple years back.
No, it's from some angry letter he wrote to a con when they misspelled his name in their invitation to him.Oh no, that was just my personal opinion. Is that from the web-comics book? I've had that forever and still haven't got around to reading it.
Wait, really?! I mean, I always knew that Kurtz had an over-inflated opinion of himself, but he wrote an angry letter to a con over a misspelled name, which may very well have just been a typo, in an invitation? What a fucking blowhard.No, it's from some angry letter he wrote to a con when they misspelled his name in their invitation to him.
Oh yeeaaaaah, I remember that now. Was he serious?No, it's from some angry letter he wrote to a con when they misspelled his name in their invitation to him.
Correct; that is where Kuntz generated from. Which is why I've said before that people are okay using it; if Scott didn't want people to know, he shouldn't have made the email public.I'm pretty sure they called him Steve Kuntz, so thats an unlikely typo.
Wait... I was always under the impression that letter was a joke. Like... fake outrage. Was he legitimately angry? Oh man, that's sad.No, it's from some angry letter he wrote to a con when they misspelled his name in their invitation to him.
Yeah, it's fairly difficult to hit 'n' instead of 'r' by mistake. Still, Kuntz (pronounced Koontz) isn't an entirely unheard of name; it could have been an auto-correction, if someone had added Kuntz to their Word dictionary, or it could have been something less innocent, like when a company prefills letter templates with offensive and/or random terms with the full intention of filling in the real data later. I seem to recall a utility company sending letters to all of their customers that started "Dear whiny customer" or some such.I'm pretty sure they called him Steve Kuntz, so thats an unlikely typo.
There was one part that didn't have to do with himself. I can't remember the cartoonist's name, but he was a friend of Scott's and he died a few months before this email situation. The con in question had snubbed that cartoonist in some respect in the past, I can't remember in what way, and that was what one of Scott's paragraphs of the email was about, that he wouldn't attend the con that did that regardless of getting his name right, paying to fly him out, etc.Wait... I was always under the impression that letter was a joke. Like... fake outrage. Was he legitimately angry? Oh man, that's sad.