It makes for a great read though!Huh. So my Barbie thread got locked.
I was wondering where it went!
I gotta read this shit now.I've read the thread . It was pretty entertaining.
However, I didn't detect anyone being 'mean'. I think the closest it got was Mathias trying to call out bull in his...usual manner. After pez mentioned his relgious beliefs the thread became a lot LESS hostile...until pez started disagreeing with any scientific fact.
I'd be really interested in knowing what the general reports were saying. Perhaps I'm just tough or maybe I'm insensitive because I just don't see how a discussion on beauty ,sex and a bit of feminism/misogyny was closed.
Edit: Woops. Sorry. I'll leave it be for real this time.
Okay, I'm sick of this bullshit. No one knows what part of the posts I was disagreeing with, they just assumed based on their prejudice.until pez started disagreeing with any scientific fact.
Okay, I'm sick of this bullshit. No one knows what part of the posts I was disagreeing with, they just assumed based on their prejudice.
You're an idiot. "Men think about sex every _____ seconds" is NOT A FACT. That's the problem with your prejudice. You automatically assume that any statement about "science" is true, and any disagreement by someone who believes in religion is false. You don't even stop to consider that its' very difficult for soundbites to be true, and that many bits of conventional wisdom have been debunked but are still brought out in internet arguments time and time again.all anyone was doing was pointing out scientific facts
There was much more than just that posted kiddo. You ignored all the rest of the proof which were far from soundbites. You're putting your fingers in your ears and pressing that dislike button.You're an idiot. "Men think about sex every _____ seconds" is NOT A FACT. That's the problem with your prejudice. You automatically assume that any statement about "science" is true, and any disagreement by someone who believes in religion is false. You don't even stop to consider that its' very difficult for soundbites to be true, and that many bits of conventional wisdom have been debunked but are still brought out in internet arguments time and time again.
Again, back to your prejudice. You made assumptions about what I disagreed with, without bothering to even ask.There was much more than just that posted kiddo. You ignored all the rest of the proof which were far from soundbites. You're putting your fingers in your ears and pressing that like button.
And you were wrong. You made a false statement about me, so I disagreed with it.See? You disagreed with me, when I just said you weren't reading the post..
Don't be sorry that he's causing another explosion over something he's not even bothering to try to understand.Okay guys. I'm sorry.
Can't, it'll get closed because people will report it. That's the problem with closing threads with discussions, the discussions will continue until they're "done". Worse if you close the thread, it'll spill into multiple threads.I'd say naming names is a lot like starting it, although I can't say that fig coming in to argue is a good call either. I'm just requesting that you take it to pms or let the damn thing drop. Or hell, start a new thread to talk about whatever y'all were talking about.
No.Care to explain?
What am I supposed to do? Just sit here and listen to the libel?I'd say naming names is a lot like starting it, although I can't say that fig coming in to argue is a good call either.