Man, I should've known the reprecussions of posting this news...
I generally try to look at any human interaction without projecting my own bias on it (I obviously don't always succeed, mind you). If you take away the "ew, they're blood related" out of the equation, what they're doing isn't really all that out of left field.Oh, it's a tame discussion compared to many, I agree. I just didn't expect some to be essentially defending it.
Clearly the answer is to only have relationships with people you feel no sexual attraction to.This just reminds me that I have had a fear for a long time of accidentally meeting and having a relationship with one of my brothers. Apparently my father, whom I do not know, has many many children. I thought wouldn't that be horrifying to end up with my brother because my dad is a manwhore? I know my dad's name and I don't really go for guys who are way older than me so I don't really worry about that.
Maybe I should worry.
ugh.
I think she's going to see through your clever plan, Bammage.Clearly the answer is to only have relationships with people you feel no sexual attraction to.
What? No no no no, I do not hit on fellow forumites. I'm sure makare's a wonderful and very attractive female, but I have no intention of making forum females uncomfortable.I think she's going to see through your clever plan, Bammage.
What, like in the back of a Volkswagen?What? No no no no, I do not hit on fellow forumites. I'm sure makare's a wonderful and very attractive female, but I have no intention of making forum females uncomfortable.
Well, at least not in that way.
I think he's Buddhist.Are that cat's paws tied together?
bmp bmp bmp is this thing on? I almost said exactly the same thing like 5 posts up. Echo echo echo echo echo echo ...Though, really, the fact that some recessive genes may have a better chance to be dominant can be an issue. However, people tend to think that as soon as anyone blood related has a kid, it will pop out some sort of flipper baby. That's simply not the case.
Sociologically, that's most likely where the taboo came from in the first place. Breed the strongest children by varying the gene pool.
I'm not defending it at all. I'm saying that, even though it's interesting (actually, super icky, if I think about myself and my own father) to think about, when it comes down to it I don't really care what they doOh, it's a tame discussion compared to many, I agree. I just didn't expect some to be essentially defending it.
I'm a bit confused here. Either this couple should have a right to their sexual relationship, which means everyone else needs to deal with it regardless of their personal squick factor. Or they should not have the right, in which case they've done something rather bad. I got the distinct impression you were defending their right to have that relationship.I'm not defending it at all. I'm saying that, even though it's interesting (actually, super icky, if I think about myself and my own father) to think about, when it comes down to it I don't really care what they do
As long as the kid has 12 fingers and toes it'll be okay.
Which I agree with, I'm just saying that the reason people are having a hard time with this is because it's almost impossible for this sort of relationship to not be abuse on some level. Like I said, this may very well be the exception to the rule, and the article certainly seems to imply it is. Considering the facts I would personally say they can go nuts for all I care. However I would not be surprised to find that despite the lack of traditional father/daughter roles here there is still part of that power dynamic at play.Espy , when I say consenting adults, I'm not just talking about age, but an emotional level of maturity. So again, two consenting adults who aren't harming anyone (not a parent "abusing the situation"), have at it.
Eh, there's a difference to me between actively defending it ("yay, incest!") and defending their right to do what they want by saying it's not the government's place to tell them they can't. I'm not going to defend the Westboro Baptist Church for being a bunch of asshats, but I'm going to defend their right to asshattery.I'm a bit confused here. Either this couple should have a right to their sexual relationship, which means everyone else needs to deal with it regardless of their personal squick factor. Or they should not have the right, in which case they've done something rather bad. I got the distinct impression you were defending their right to have that relationship.
Or did you mean you have no problem with the relationship, only with the child?