I've avoided Batman spoilers by not going into messageboard threads about Batman until after I've seen it. You could probably apply that same philosophy here.AND HCGLNS WINS THE GOLD FOR SPOILING OLYMPIC EVENTS!!!
I mean really, Batman has been out for 3 weeks and we still spoiler that crap. The game is not over on TV now, but it is just fine to give away the ending.
Considering 90% of the world saw it live and every news outlet *including* NBC posted results all over the internet as soon as it happened, the onus is on the viewer to avoid "spoilers".Considering for those that can't watch on computer live, and it's airing currently on NBC's evening telecast, maybe waiting another hour would have been good.
Till right the fuck now, they just finished the match on NBC[DOUBLEPOST=1344477025][/DOUBLEPOST]So a team that has gone undefeated in 3 straight olympics winning the gold is a spoiler?
What are waiting for? tomorrows newspaper or next weeks Sports Illustrated?
We only have one person here that has given out spoilers twice.Considering 90% of the world saw it live and every news outlet *including* NBC posted results all over the internet as soon as it happened, the onus is on the viewer to avoid "spoilers".
West coast broadcast hasn't started yet. Fortunately, I don't mind spoilers, I go looking for them.Till right the fuck now, they just finished the match on NBC
West coast broadcast hasn't started yet. Fortunately, I don't mind spoilers, I go looking for them.
One click. That red 'X' on the browser.If there were just some way not to cause drama... like a mouse drag and one click...
It doesn't matter if other news sources or forums post spoilers - you can't use the excuse that since other places do it, then it's acceptable at Halforums despite the rules. Please don't be mean about it and insist that they are at fault for stumbling upon your ambush spoilers. Everyone should know and understand that NBC delays the actual races for many events for US viewers.13. Spoilers. A "spoiler" is a statement or piece of information that gives away information about the story of a book or film. An Ambush Spoiler is a spoiler in a thread which does not use our spoiler tag in a thread that has not been marked as having spoilers. There is a certain statute of limitations on what can and cannot be spoilered. Things which are common knowledge (IE: Darth Vader is Luke Skywalker's father, Hamlet dies at the end of the play, etc.) can safely be left unspoilered. Basically if it's over a year old it should be safe.
Wait, Hamlet dies?
If we are going to post open spoilers in this thread, please ask the OP to change the thread title to include "SPOILERS".
Otherwise please follow the forum rule #13:
It doesn't matter if other news sources or forums post spoilers - you can't use the excuse that since other places do it, then it's acceptable at Halforums despite the rules. Please don't be mean about it and insist that they are at fault for stumbling upon your ambush spoilers. Everyone should know and understand that NBC delays the actual races for many events for US viewers.
It's a spoiler. Change the thread title, create a new thread, or spoiler tag your spoilers. Those are your options, and if you choose not to follow them, you are breaking the forum rules. To do so and rub it in someone's face is the height of arrogance.
Alternately, ask Dave to change the rules so people can openly post spoilers.
This is neither. Technically, it's not a spoiler under that rule. You could argue the forum rule needs updating, of course, but at the moment, it's perfectly fine.[DOUBLEPOST=1344514713][/DOUBLEPOST]Also,information about the story of a book or film
Wait, Hamlet dies?
I meant internally actually... and even then it was less then 8...Oh, any compassion we were getting from the rest of the world was gone within 3 years, not 8.
Military hostile media in the US... let me guess, anyone questioning something the military does qualifies...That's some charlie level delusion right there. The military WANTS embedded journalists from military-hostile media sources? What a laugh.
Actually the Brits at least seem to have used mostly positive reinforcement stuff (or they're really good at hiding it from wikipedia): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_propaganda_during_World_War_II (of course they couldn't really do any racial caricatures of the germans for obvious reasons).Simple, catchy and quick. Call it grade school if you want, it got results. And we didn't have a monopoly on dehumanizing our enemies, either. I seem to recall reading all kinds of demeaning caricatures from nearly all the major players in that war and pretty much every war.
I am a little worried about myself. I see that pic and go "wow, HOT!" but at the same time I was thinking... "WTF is up with that sweater?"
gasp! oh no! you might stop sexualizing female athletes for a second!!!I am a little worried about myself. I see that pic and go "wow, HOT!" but at the same time I was thinking... "WTF is up with that sweater?"
Because clearly, in that pose and clothing, her intent was not to display sexuality.gasp! oh no! you might stop sexualizing female athletes for a second!!!
By posing for that photograph she afforded me the opportunity to see a large area of her naked body... yep I am 'sexualizing' her with out her permission.gasp! oh no! you might stop sexualizing female athletes for a second!!!
gasp! oh no! you might stop sexualizing female athletes for a second!!!