At least they got the important one right.Welp....
At least they got the important one right.Welp....
Supposedly the image is from NBC coverage. It's not the first time they've mixed up flagsI thought only Americans were that bad at Geography.
Gold medal game.Everyone's upset over the officiating, claiming the match was rigged for the Americans. I didn't watch it, because I don't really care about soccer or anything in the summer Olympics (I didn't even get to see Mary Spencer's fight- which was the only thing I did care about- and she lost). Also my internet went out Saturday night and I didn't get it back until today so even if I had cared to watch it I couldn't have.
But Since nobody will shut up about it, I've seen clips of the supposed rigged calls, and I've read about the arguments both from Canadians and Americans, and it just seems to me like the officiating was BAD, not rigged, just BAD. And it's seemed to me since these Olympics started that my country's turning into a bunch of sore losers, who are expecting Canadian athletes to deliver like in Vancouver, forgetting that Canada has ALWAYS done better at the Winter Olympics than the Summer ones, and that the COC's goal for these games was to crack the top 12, which was considered by many to be overly ambitious. But people want us to take another number 1 spot, or to take more gold medals, and are so frustrated by what they are perceiving as underperforming, that they've taken to childish cries of "NOT FAIR NOT FAIR!".
So they're using NHL officials?And there were missed calls on the Canadian team too I'm sure. I saw a clip where one girl (Canadian) stomped on another's (American) head. No call.
Bad officiating. But not rigged.
5 referees, or 7 for the top matches. Only one on the field, but 2 on the lines and 2 more following with computers.22 players on the field, with only one referee.
<snark>What you you expect from a game where the officials can't figure out how to work a stopwatch?</snark>
Not allowing replay/ call review is a big problem with a lot of sports, I think. I get that they worry it'd slow the game down cause every call would wind up getting scrutinized, but honestly, just limit the number of call disputes a team can make. I really like how Box Lacrosse does it, where each team can throw in the towel twice a game to dispute the call. And almost every time I've seen them do it (Usually for crease violations), the call on the field gets reversed.5 referees, or 7 for the top matches. Only one on the field, but 2 on the lines and 2 more following with computers.
There's plenty of silly things in football, but not really the lack of referees. Not allowing computer replays to change a ruling is idiotic, for example.
Also, yes, that's some baaaad refereeing.
I like the tennis/badminton style. You get 2 (or 3, depending) calls; if you're right, you keep your call, if you're wrong, you lose it. So....make all the calls you want - as long as you're right every time. If you're wrong 3 times, though, tough luck for the rest of the game.Not allowing replay/ call review is a big problem with a lot of sports, I think. I get that they worry it'd slow the game down cause every call would wind up getting scrutinized, but honestly, just limit the number of call disputes a team can make. I really like how Box Lacrosse does it, where each team can throw in the towel twice a game to dispute the call. And almost every time I've seen them do it (Usually for crease violations), the call on the field gets reversed.
[DOUBLEPOST=1344623532][/DOUBLEPOST]No the stupid redirect essentially prevents you shopping for Team GB stuff in the US, even though the site has prices for shipping to the USA.Dumb question of the day: am I the only one who's having shop.london2012.com redirect to www.teamusashop.com?
I agree, very poor "non-call." There were a couple of other calls in the same game that were just WTF? That handball should have been called and a PK awarded for Japan. German ref, seemed more interested in her hair than the game.Gold medal game.
No call on the play.
Disgusting.
That we're the best?Yep.
And they also got the American stereotype right as well.
Nice try.That we're the best?
I'm really, really looking forward to the games in Rio. I'm eager to see what kind of show the Brazilians put on.Cool, the US won the Olympics again, see you in Rio
I think that everyone that competed was a winner, not just a country, it's so much more than just a medal count. The Saudi woman that raced and the rower from Niger all the way up to Phelps and Bolt are inspirations to everyone.Cool, the US won the Olympics again, see you in Rio
Haven't they changed this a few times already?I am pretty proud of the Spanish Basketball team. They took a bunch of future Hall of Fame Players to the wire.
I just wonder what the age requirement change will do to Olympic Basketball.
The NCAA has issues with everything. A text message sent at the wrong time to the wrong number can have you ruled ineligible. A weather delayed flight has had a kid ruled ineligible.Wasn't part of the problem for the US that the NCAA had issues with eligibility after some players participated in the Olympics and World Championships? I don't remember clearly, and that could just have been speculation.
Heh. Relevant to both parts of the conversation - in 2010/11, Turkish player Enes Kanter was ruled permanently ineligible to play for any NCAA member school, due to his having played for a Turkish club team during his teens. In the US, the AAU system is still able to maintain some semblance of amateurism, at least by NCAA standards. The international club system allows youth players to play for professional teams in what basically amounts to a "minor leagues". While playing for his team, Kanter was paid what amounted to cost-of-living expenses, plus an additional amount for education expenses. Unfortunately, the "additional" education money was paid directly to his parents, who set the money aside in a separate account, where it remained untouched. The NCAA allows for this scenario, but the club team must pay the educational institution directly, i.e. it can't be a reimbursement to the parents, as it was in this case. Ultimately, it was determined that Kanter was paid around $20K above the actual expenses incurred, & even though the Kanters never touched the money (think his father is a doctor) & offered to return the money to the club, the NCAA laid down the ban-hammer. Meanwhile in America, high-school & college players already in the system accept "gifts" of hundreds to thousands of dollars worth of goods & merchandise, some from known sports agents, & are still allowed to play after serving multi-game suspensions & making reparations. /rantThe NCAA has issues with everything. A text message sent at the wrong time to the wrong number can have you ruled ineligible. A weather delayed flight has had a kid ruled ineligible.