See, I thought it started it quite well and was very enjoyable little bit of sci-fi...right up until it's turn into fucking strange Bonnie and Clyde overt 99%er stuff.In Time
I've been wanting to see this since watching the trailer, but never got a chance to see it while it was in theatres because...well, the theatre where I lived for the past year sucked ass. But it popped up on Netflix recently and I just gave it a watch (heh, watch. Time. Pun. )
And I dug it. It was a neat movie with an interesting premise. It was pretty blatantly obvious that the movie was about the 99% vs. the 1% and all that, but it was still a solid enough movie with some neat ideas with the time on each person's arm.
It certainly won't win any awards and there are loads of better sci-fi movies out there, but I'd say give it a at least one watch.
Pretty much this.Every time you review a movie, NR, we are one step closer to being mortal enemies.
Stop being so civil. This is Halforums, dammit. Get mad!That being said, the arguments you make, particularly in the case of Ferris Bueller, make sense. I just disagree with them.
Stop being so civil. This is Halforums, dammit. Get mad!
You simply saw it too late in life. It's escapism fantasy for teenagers who wish they could be that awesome.Ferris Bueller's Day Off
or "A Popular Kid Does Whatever the Fuck He Wants". Guess I'm infected by that one Cracked article I read, but honestly I didn't find this movie that likeable. Most of the time I just kept thinking what a dipshit the title character is and how he gets away with everything with little to no effort. To me, this was pretty much Mary Stu: The Motion Picture. And that's even bad cinema, if you ask me. If the "hero" pretty much automatically outfoxes and beats every obstacle with his left hand with his hand tied behind his back, there's no suspense. Kudos for eerily prophetic description of Charlie Sheen, though.
Perhaps. For me personally, the first American Pie movie is the teen comedy. Not that I ever felt the particular desire to molest apple pies, but the whole sexual frustration angle kinda spoke volumes to me. Which made the subsequent movies - the sequel, the wedding, the reunion - that much sweeter.You simply saw it too late in life. It's escapism fantasy for teenagers who wish they could be that awesome.
Thank you. I never endeavour to proclaim myself the Halforumite version of Leonard Maltin; I just know what I like and what I don't like. And considering how much people seem to drone about Ferris Bueller, I decided to give it a try - and found it lacking. But that's just how I see it, matters of taste are subjective in any case.That being said, the arguments you make, particularly in the case of Ferris Bueller, make sense. I just disagree with them.
Totally this.You simply saw it too late in life. It's escapism fantasy for teenagers who wish they could be that awesome.
And look how well you turned out, eh?every day in the late 90s/00s when I skipped school (this was an incountable number, yay single parent household), the first thing I did was put on Dirty Work, then Ferris Bueller while I dozed / half-watched until lunch time
No. Anti-humor sucks. The joke is on the audience and not for the audience.and he was the sole entertaining roaster at Bob Saget's roast.
sorry let me let you get back to stamos talking about banging the olsen twins and that obnoxious lady that talks about fucking black men and her huge vaginaNo. Anti-humor sucks. The joke is on the audience and not for the audience.
I felt like the joke was for his friends and fellow comedians. That it was on the audience was tertiary.No. Anti-humor sucks. The joke is on the audience and not for the audience.
I figured. I mean you can't watch Dirty Work that often and not love Norm MacDonald, it wouldn't add up.I'm actually kidding, I love Norm McDonald, Dirty Work owns, that interview is legendary, and he was the sole entertaining roaster at Bob Saget's roast. His most recent standup thing I've seen on Netflix is also really funny.
I wasn't promoting anyone else in the roast. My problem is with anti-humor. It is fundamentally for the people in on the joke, namely the comedians themselves. They might as well just heckle the audience.sorry let me let you get back to stamos talking about banging the olsen twins and that obnoxious lady that talks about fucking black men and her huge vagina
I don't think I'll ever upgrade those to HD. I don't need to tarnish them. This is also why I stand up for 80s effect, primarily puppetry. That stuff never ages--if it didn't look good then, it doesn't look good now, but if it looked good then, it holds up.Lord of the Rings (Fellowship & Two Towers, so far)
My mother gave me a $50 gift card to Future Shop, so I bought the BluRay Extended Edition collection.
And overall, it's still as amazing and breath taking as ever. Howard Shore's score continues to wonder. The acting is great right across the board with no one to complain about.
That said...some of the special effects have not aged particularly well. The make up, sets, and costumes are all fantastic. However - and maybe this is the problem with BluRay - but CGI related effects are much more obvious. The Ents and Gollum, particularly. Gollum still looks and sounds great, of course, but the animation is stiffer than today's character animations. And it's much, much, much more obvious than I remember that he's super imposed into the scenes. You can almost see an outline around him. It's not horrible, but it is noticeable. That's the problem with 10 years time. It was revolutionary at the time, but it hasn't entirely held up well. It's interesting to watch older movies (or even some rare movies today) that still use practical effects that stand up better to time than CGI.
I had no choice!Happy Feet 2
When a crippled woman gets up and leaves the room, it's a bad fucking movie.