13 real life kids straight out of horror movies.

Status
Not open for further replies.
You know, one thing I noticed is that most of these stories fall along the lines of "people wanted the death penalty, but the judge went lenient on the kid and now they're out." Up until you get to the black kid, which then becomes "youngest person to get life in prison without parole."
 
Ugh, the worst is when you read that a kid did something sexual to their victims. That's usually a spot on indicator that that kid themselves had been victims of sexual crimes.
 
You know, one thing I noticed is that most of these stories fall along the lines of "people wanted the death penalty, but the judge went lenient on the kid and now they're out." Up until you get to the black kid, which then becomes "youngest person to get life in prison without parole."
Who was then released, and robbed a pizza delivery...
 
I think I could have gone the rest of my life quite happily not knowing about Albert Fish... damn my innate curiosity.
 

Cajungal

Staff member
You know, one thing I noticed is that most of these stories fall along the lines of "people wanted the death penalty, but the judge went lenient on the kid and now they're out." Up until you get to the black kid, which then becomes "youngest person to get life in prison without parole."
I noticed that too.

Brrr... this is disturbing.
 
Parents of young infants should not read that link. :(
I'm not certain that anyone should read that link. At the risk of starting a philosophical discussion, is there really any purpose that a list like that serves, other than to remind us that there are "monsters" in this world?
 

Necronic

Staff member
you know, a couple of them aren't that bad. The black kids for instance actually seems like ti could have been an accident. Except for the fact that he was black of course.
 
I do like that the examples are from all sorts of time periods. Usually when they have an article like this, they use it as a springboard to try to illustrate how the current state of the media or culture is breeding kids who are serial killers.
 

Necronic

Staff member
the nastiest serial killers I've heard of were HH Holmes and Albert Fish, bar none. Not to mention war criminals/murderous royalty. Serial killers of today have nothing on the old ones. Thankfully.
 
the nastiest serial killers I've heard of were HH Holmes and Albert Fish, bar none. Not to mention war criminals/murderous royalty. Serial killers of today have nothing on the old ones. Thankfully.
So far as we've heard, at least. Last I heard, they still didn't know why all of those feet kept washing ashore in B.C, pre-tsunami.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
I'm not certain that anyone should read that link. At the risk of starting a philosophical discussion, is there really any purpose that a list like that serves, other than to remind us that there are "monsters" in this world?
Yes. I want to hurt your soul.

But that aside, there's little I enjoy more than a "Human beings are inherently evil" discussion.
 
heh. If reading words on an electronic medium could hurt my soul, I'd be screwed. Or dead. Or possibly locked away in a psychiatric hospital for the rest of my days. I'm pretty sure my soul is safe from reading this list.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
heh. If reading words on an electronic medium could hurt my soul, I'd be screwed. Or dead. Or possibly locked away in a psychiatric hospital for the rest of my days. I'm pretty sure my soul is safe from reading this list.
Sociopath.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Though, since you specify "electronic" medium, would you say you are more susceptible to the physically printed word?
 
That depends. If I'm just listening to a story, or a description of something or someone, no. If someone is talking directly to me, and is threatening me or my loved ones/friends? Then yeah, I can be affected by that.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
That depends. If I'm just listening to a story, or a description of something or someone, no. If someone is talking directly to me, and is threatening me or my loved ones/friends? Then yeah, I can be affected by that.
Does it have to be a threat? There is no abstract, or merely non-immediate concept which can threaten your perception of yourself or the world around you?
 
Sure, but we were discussing what could hurt my soul, not what could alter my perception of myself or the world around me. Plenty of things can alter my perception of myself or the world around me, but my soul remains (mostly) intact. Even this conversation has the possibility of altering my perception of myself, if not directly through your questions then indirectly by the amount, and topic, of introspection that goes into me formulating my answers.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Sure, but we were discussing what could hurt my soul, not what could alter my perception of myself or the world around me. Plenty of things can alter my perception of myself or the world around me, but my soul remains (mostly) intact. Even this conversation has the possibility of altering my perception of myself, if not directly through your questions then indirectly by the amount, and topic, of introspection that goes into me formulating my answers.
It's just a question of the magnitude and direction of the alteration of perception.
 
I can see that, but the amount of difference in magnitude between altering my perception enough to say, make me dread my drive home, and making me think less of myself is ginormous; and it's highly unlikely that anything anyone can say to me, before I have a chance to disengage from the conversation/argument/what-have-you is going to be enough to do the trick.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top