Well the position is that theft is wrong because when i take a thing from you you no longer have it...I think my all time favorite argument is the "Well, no one is losing out since I never would have bought it anyway". The logic of that completely loses me. I mean, there are some valid and some semi-valid reasons to dl torrents, but that one just mystifies me.
Like if you had an actual cornucopia that gave out unlimited food, and someone took food from it without your permission, would he be a bad person, or would you for not giving it to everyone, because you'll never run out anyway.
Of course the problem is that while the virtual good are unlimited, food and shelter isn't, so they can't give out the unlimited resource for nothing because they'll starve... but if i can't/won't give him the amount of money he's asking then making another copy won't actually deprive anyone of the resource nor will it change the fact that he won't get any money from me... making a stand based on morals developed for limited resources makes little sense then...
Of course plenty of people that use that argument are probably lying...
Added at: 08:26
Yeah, but healthcare needs limited resources to make more medicine etc... while making another copy of a Sopranos episode is virtually costless...healthcare is a right, season 3 of the sopranos is a privilege
If healthcare and food where as easy to reproduce no one would even bother arguing about watching the Sopranos' without paying...
We'd be all like "what are you, a Ferengi?"