I'm not sure if anyone has mentioned it yet, but Edgar Wright does have two possible people in mind now to play Ant-Man: either Joseph Gordon-Levitt or Paul Rudd.
Well they keep fucking up her powers and making her too strong... and then they have to fix it and can't think of anything better. At least she doesn't keep dying and coming back, like some other i can think of (no matter how appropriate the codename).Yeah, but the Scarlet Witch keeps going crazy.
I am actually curious how they will handle her character. Will calling her a "mutant" cause a stink with Sony? Also, I wonder how they will approach her magic, considering they went to great lengths to alter the Thor cinematic universe to involve a whole lot of technology behind a lot of the things they use and just sort of hand waving the rest.I'd rather have Ms. Marvel than the Scarlet Witch. Mutant magic/magic characters are less compelling to me. Though, I'll take the witch over Black Widow.
Maybe they'll do the smart thing and just go back to ther original power, and just use it better...I am actually curious how they will handle her character. Will calling her a "mutant" cause a stink with Sony? Also, I wonder how they will approach her magic, considering they went to great lengths to alter the Thor cinematic universe to involve a whole lot of technology behind a lot of the things they use and just sort of hand waving the rest.
Paul Rudd could be incredible in that role, or awful. JGL is a safe bet, but probably won't excel.I'm not sure if anyone has mentioned it yet, but Edgar Wright does have two possible people in mind now to play Ant-Man: either Joseph Gordon-Levitt or Paul Rudd.
As opposed to deus ex machina "magic" powers that do (or dont do) whatever the plot requires?I hate the entire concept of "luck" powers. Even though I may like the characters individually (Longshot, Black Cat, Scarlet Witch, Domino) if they're any good it's usually in spite of their powers, not because of them.
If this Ant-Man is the dude who steals the technology from SHIELD and is a complete dick Ant-Man, I would love to see Paul Rudd in the role.Paul Rudd could be incredible in that role, or awful. JGL is a safe bet, but probably won't excel.
I have no problem with this.A number of sites have already posted this news, but I think From Bricks to Bothans has the best headline thus far:
Paul Rudd Lands Small Role In Ant Man
My guess is that they're only going to have a passing reference to it. Sort of like if Ant-Man punches out a henchwoman, and someone comments, "So you don't have a problem with hitting women?" And he replies, "Not one bit."I REALLY hope they play up the abusive/innadequacy angle, just a bit.
“When Edgar Wright came to us with the idea of Paul Rudd, we felt a huge sense of relief because the first step in creating any Marvel Studios film is finding the right star," said Marvel's Kevin Feige. "We knew early on that we had found the right person in Paul. When he not only agreed to do it but became as enthusiastic as any actor we’d ever met with about doing the work, we knew we’d found the right guy. We couldn’t be more excited for our audiences to see what he’s going to do to bring Ant-Man to life.”
I could see that. There's also been early talk by Kevin Feige describing the film as a "heist" movie, so it could be like that.I don't think they would have enough time in a single movie to have both characters be mainstays. My guess is they are going to go the route of Hank Pym being involved as the inventor, and maybe test out the suit near the beginning, while Lang ultimately steals it close to half way through, leading to the more action filled sections shown in those test shots we saw awhile back. I always felt those shots when he is becoming small and punching guards in the face was much less Pym and way more Lang (Pym always tired himself out punching Wasp. Oh shiiii.... That was hard to say)
If that is the case, then Rudd is likely playing Lang, since he would continue on as Ant-Man from that point.
Totally hyperbole. People see Hank Pym in a couple of panels with the Avengers and get the idea it's a regular thing.You comic book ner...aficionados are going to have to fill this is for those of us who got all of our information from Avengers Assemble. Isn't Hank Pym not that much older than Scott Lang? Also, judging from what I've seen online, Hank Pym's entire run as Ant Man was continually spent beating his wife while occasionally pausing to hang out with the Avengers. Does that sound about right, or is there a touch of hyperbole going on there?
That, and the wife beating was one time when Hank was going through a bad nervous breakdown.Totally hyperbole. People see Hank Pym in a couple of panels with the Avengers and get the idea it's a regular thing.
More seriously, while Hank Pym isn't normally much older than Scott, Wright mentioned in an interview a couple of years ago that he saw himself using Hank as a superhero in the 60's, old school style, then jumping forward to Scott's story (taken from the link about Rudd's casting up the thread).
...That's the joke. While the wife-beating is the obvious hyperbole and Fun Size was being sarcastic, I went the opposite direction with expectations saying that it's his role in the Avengers that was exaggerated (cause it's not like he was a founding member or anything). Evidently it did not come across well...That, and the wife beating was one time when Hank was going through a bad nervous breakdown.
I thought that too, but I just re-read the Kree/Skrull War and he straight up pimp slaps Wasp unconscious (he was doing it to protect her/keep her out of the fight, but still).That, and the wife beating was one time when Hank was going through a bad nervous breakdown.
That's exactly what spousal abuse is.I thought that too, but I just re-read the Kree/Skrull War and he straight up pimp slaps Wasp unconscious (he was doing it to protect her/keep her out of the fight, but still).